These are all old tired arguments that presupose that God can defeat God (which has not been proven as His existence has not been proven so His nature could not be divined). I will address your point about it being illogical and a sign of ignorance to believe in a god or God. I give you Stephen W. Hawkings in his book "A Brief History Of TIme". Paraphrasing he states that even if you can explain the universe with a "big bang" (which he later proposed was NOT the case), or any other mechanism which brought about the "begining", you still must fall back upon some sort of "creator" to create this mecainism. I recommend the book. It's a great read.
A beginning to the CURRENT state of the Universe/Multiverse does not infer GAWD, it simply means that the whole thing is MODAL; moving from one state to another without exact predictibility by anyone[dig up some chaos theory, kiddo]. The fact remains your whole argument is retarded and you know it. You're just another Jeebus Geek trying to hide the fact that Jeebus called Gentiles DOGS[Gospel of Mark] and that 'he' came for the 'jews.' All in all, I have NO TIME for debating an ignorant little man. So until you can make a case for GAWD, appending Anarchism or any other political theory is...SHALLOW.
-- Bridget
Actually, you propose (along with others) that it is modal. You also will have to wait until someone (unlikely in our lifetimes) proves the chaos theory. Funny thing about theories. They are just that.
Actually Lorenz proved it when he tried to model weather and climate. In the end, his equations are correct thus far. You have to know refute their validity since not only does Chaos Theory deals with weather; it also deals with life, thermodynamics, electrodynamics, geophysics, and etc.
-- Bridget