the concept of a lien asserts an OBLIGATION. What obligation has eukreign agreed to within his scenerio?
a persons exclusive use of a particular location via a title IMPOSES a legal and monetary OBLIGATION on those being excluded violating their absolute rights to labor and thus to self-ownership.
What obligation do I impose on you if I exclude you from anything? Say, a genetic female, and the only one left alive. You and all the other genetic males have to make a choice. Either YOU OWN HER BODY IN COMMON, being that she is scarce, being the only female left on Earth, or you accept the reality that her body cannot be owned by anyone but her since she is the current occupier. According to your logic, this is the same issue as with land. The occupation of a finite domain/resource/X, which according to you should be or will be shared equally among everyone. So, by that logic, in my scenerio it is moral, according to YOUR ARGUMENT, for all male to have their share of the single sole female left on Earth even if she resists and protests.
The same can be said for a homesteader that resists and protests your lien. Your lien is force, get over it. You yield to the collective. I yield to the individual. Thus, comes the crux. Either you accept that individuals are the prime cause of all acts on their own, and thus are sovereign. Or you accept that the society is the prime cause of all acts, thus it is the only sovereign and all individuals are its subordinates. Which will it be, Benny?
What loan does eukreign pay in his scenerio of being self-sufficient?
the socially created economic rent is then made equally available to all members of a community in the form of a non-interest bearing "loan" that does not have to be repaid.
Then why do you impose a lien on eukreign's hypothetical homestead that is self-sufficient?
I mean, think about it. I am never free to move about as I wish and do as I wish for the simple fact that others can easily impede me.
in a state of nature there would be "perfect freedom".
There is nothing in Nature that is conceptual. There are only concretes. Percepts are also not found in Nature, they are the resultant of concretes as well.
in my system no one would be economically disadvantaged no matter where anyone else located (which means by reason you will be excluded since two people can not stand in the same location at the same time) - a state of "equal liberty" the next best thing to "perfect freedom"
There is no equality in liberty. Liberty is the state of being free of obligations, period and end of story. It's like saying we're all equally pregnant, yet that doesn't follow either. Males can't get preggers, so should women pay for all men to get uteruses to be equally preggers?
Or how about we're all equally white/black/yellow? Wanna look like MJ? LOL. See, equality in liberty leads to logical and moral absurdities. Thus, your whole argument is false. Thanks for trying, but you're like a BRANDENDROID left in your own logic loop that you will not accept its refutation.
-- Bridget