That show did have a "local" feel to it. I think it would have been a good idea to start with some show prep for the first 15 minutes or so--some NATIONAL story.
I don't generally follow politics which is one reason why I've traditionally been a fan of Cracked articles. I had that one ready to go but we had calls right away and callers always take priority over show prep. It's frustrating for me too when people call in to say "hi" and then have nowhere to go. I think that's somewhat of a first show phenomenon and partly my fault because I encouraged people to call in on Facebook so some tend to be supportive friends and acquaintances. Since the show's usually not on Sundays, it seemed appropriate to get the word out as much as possible so we wouldn't have a nigh callerless show which would have been worse than having tons of calls even if a few were just shout-outs.
For what it's worth, I thought the Cracked article was good. I just think to jump-start the show with an issue (something short and sweet) would give people reasons to call in for some other reason than to say "hi." Also, you did seem more comfortable as the show went on. I think that has "recursive" value, in that it makes the audience feel better, you sense that, etc. I guess in non-geek you'd say the confidence feeds on itself, and maybe that's why a kick-start topic can be good. Obviously, people can call in about what they want, but at least it throws an idea out.
To dwell on it a bit, maybe each of the hosts should have a potential "kick-off" story. You can talk about it right before you go on and pick one, and if you get a bunch of calls lined up, you're good. If not, you go to the next kick-off story, etc. Then, of course, you could go with the deeper list later in the show. Somebody's gonna say something interesting about a topic eventually, and the show starts running itself, and you end up having Mark and Ian's problem--hardly getting to any of the prep.
That's my idea, anyway. It sounds brilliant to me, but I'm medicated at the moment.