It sounds like the arguments being posed are all about the problem and making the case that a race problem exists. That's obvious. We're talking about solutions. Just as I see drug problems but don't see the drug war as a solution, I see racism as a real problem and reverse racism is not a solution. I think it's completely missing the point to keep arguing that racism exists.
Exactly. IMO, Mark had the right attitude about it on the Sunday show. Giving privilege to people based on the color of their skin
perpetuates the issue. It's sort of like agorism. People who are fans of agorism seem to feel you have to try to live like you're in the world you want to create. Applied to this, people who want true change shouldn't want special treatment given to
anyone based on being part of a collective.
I couldn't help but laugh out loud when Stephanie sounded like the leftist in the room arguing against a black man and Mark, that she was the one who was "correct" on the issue of racism against black people. That's a certain stereotype from my "conservative" days that I still see repeated. (Of course, now I also see the Stormfront types for what they are when they obsess over the "unfairness" of these issues, so I remind myself not to obsess over that.)
FWIW, I used to see "gay marriage" that way too...that they wanted a "special kind" of marriage. Then I realized the problem was the state getting involved. I don't think it fixes the problem (any better, at least) to create a "special kind" of marriage, but I don't care any more, and instead strongly assert that the problem is that it simply isn't the state's business (or mine, if I'm not a party to the contract.) People should be able to do whatever they want to call marriage, and it isn't my business, it isn't the state's business, and the state shouldn't force anyone to treat it like it's anyone's business.
What
does matter is that people are assured their interests in jointly owned property and similar interests are properly respected, which they
should must be (constitutionally, even) if they have a signed contract saying it's the case.