I thought Gard and Dale could have done a little better with Scott. Scott made many valid and many invalid points. The invalid ones shouldn't invalidate the valid ones. On top of it, he is a collectivist. A lot of his facts are right, but, like most collectivists, his conclusions are wrong.
Jewish people do run Hollywood.
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column. So what. Scott thinks this is the same as "The Jews" run Hollywood. Marx was Jewish. So what. Again, this doesn't mean "Jews" invented communism. Actually, communism existed before Marx was alive.
I don't like the political correctness among some libertarians. If members of the Christian Right were in charge of Hollywood studios, no one would accuse me of bigotry if I said that they were promoting Christian values through their movies. Are Jews who are the head of the Hollywood studios not human? Don't they have political views which may be expressed through the movies they produce?
Is anti-Zionism the same as anti-Semitism? Can one be the former and not the latter? And what he said about radical movements was partially correct. No, I don't think Jews or anyone else invented homosexuality. I do think that the power structure, which Scott unfortunately thinks is Jewish, uses radical and not so radical movements to increase the power of government. Can anyone here seriously say that the organized homosexual movement is about individual liberty? What about the NAACP which incidentally was founded primarily by whites? What about feminism, individualist feminists excluded? Do you really thing Betty Friedan was some middle class housewife minding her own business one day and then decided that women were being so oppressed that she got the feminist movement going all by herself?
Is Scott's collectivism based on ethnicity/religion abhorrent? Yes. But no more so that any other kind of collectivism. I doubt he will ever become a libertarian.