Anti-Immigration activist Jared Taylor

[alaric89]

Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity are losing listeners. FTL has a potential incoming market. If they heard some nice paletable persuasion instead of antagonistic self righteousness like Ian used last time I called in to PU, maybe they would listen more.

[FlashX12]

Yeah that is true. And having more people to represent the traditional Conservative views may bring in more listeners. But anyways, I don't really want Taylor on to bring in listeners- but because it'll lead to an interesting discussion. No one can deny Jared Taylor is one of the most educated men on this subject, and having him represent the anti-immigration view point would just make sense.

 Here's a one hour debate between Jared Taylor & Peter March on the subject of multiculturalism in Canada:

Jared Taylor Versus Peter March: Racial Diversity In North America

[Tom Foppiano]

Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity are losing listeners.

Did you get that info from the article posted in the show prep. Cause here's the thing.....

I clicked on the "article" link and read the short news story on Huffington post which basically said, "Rush and Sean lose 30% of their listeners." I then clicked on the link HuffPo used as their source, which said the same thing. I then clicked on the link that article used as its source. Guess what the ORIGINAL article actually claimed?

Rather than Rush and Sean losing "30% of their listeners," they lost 30% of their listeners on ONE STATION. One fucking station! You should have seen the comments at HuffPo. All of the socialists were foaming at the mouth claiming that conservatism dead.

I don't know if this is where you got your info, but I wanted to bring it up as an example of blatant media bias. I used to read HuffPo all the time until I couldn't take their nonsense anymore. They're often worse than FOX. In fact, if you really want to see examples of people who hate and I mean really, really hate private property and markets.....read the comments at HuffingtonPost.com. Go there and post, "Well, I think that I should be able to keep at least 90% of my property. The government can have 10%." Or, "Gee, maybe we shouldn't vote for Obama because he failed to close Gitmo, continued the PATRIOT ACT, gave another no bid contract to Halliburton, bombed Libya without Congressional approval, continues to imprison Bradley Manning....." And see what happens. You'll be called a "racist." No bullshit.

[alaric89]

Looks like you got me again Tom.
I am willing to bet the bullshit they are spreading isn't working very well though. Even zealots notice really blatant contradictions.

[Tom Foppiano]

I'm not trying to get you, buddy. I'm trying to get HuffPo.

I thought the same thing, at first. I almost never read the source links, but in this case I just happened to click to the link.

[Turd Ferguson]

I remember years ago when the Huffington Post was a FAIRLY liberty oriented rag.

That was before Arianna Huffington decided she liked being all up inside Hillary Clintons crotch 24/7.

She is probably the only person that I know of that has gone from a relatively small government stance on things, to a mostly statist belief system.

Strange chick.

[hellbilly]

Good catch Tom. I love finding shit like that.

Taylor is a good speaker. Regardless of whether or not you like his message, his points are valid. I'd like to hear him on the show too. I think it would be a similar interview as to the one with Taylor and The Young Turks guy. Watched it awhile ago but I think it's this one:

PT 1: Jared Taylor vs The Young Turks (FULL VIDEO UNEDITED)

[dalebert]

Oh, he's a racIAList.  I'ma call Ian right now and ask WTF hasn't he invited this guy as a special guest.

[alaric89]

I don't really see what all the fuss is about. I don't think Ian could stay cool, but Mark would own that guy in a rational debate.

[hellbilly]

I don't really see what all the fuss is about. I don't think Ian could stay cool, but Mark would own that guy in a rational debate.

Totally agree with you about Ian, but about Mark... really? I don't think so a'tall.

[Turd Ferguson]

I don't really see what all the fuss is about. I don't think Ian could stay cool, but Mark would own that guy in a rational debate.

Totally agree with you about Ian, but about Mark... really? I don't think so a'tall.

Yeah, when Mark gets pissed and tries to keep his cool, he turns into a stammering wreck (his own words, not mine). He actually does better when he lets himself go apeshit on people.

[hellbilly]

Not Mark's temper so much as it's Taylor's points. He makes sense even if you don't like what he's saying.

[alaric89]

Mark would jump on his inconsistency on the artificially preserved culture vs. merit of a emergent one, just like I would. (Read you can't preserve a culture by force)

[hellbilly]

I question that though-

How many "emergent" cultures would be long gone without aid supplied by "superior" cultures? From digging wells to advances in medical technology - or hell, even the use of vitamin A. Natural selection does not apply when those with good intentions cause the unfortunate to thrive - it upsets the balance.

I'm thinking of African tribes who haven't progressed much in a century or so. It's not always the case that the emergent cultures have something superior to offer, could be that those with the upper hand (not necessarily superior) are too generous for their own good - like the Native Americans. From what I know, many natives had grand visions of a peaceful brown world too.

Also true that superior cultures have wiped out "lesser" cultures, still continues in more primitive areas, but I'm betting all future "culture" wars in 1st world countries will be won by aggressive minorities through guilt tripping/psychological means and a healthy does of politically correct laws against a docile majority.

The docile disposition displayed by so many is another quality bit of proof that dispels the notion of superiority.

[alaric89]

You mean like all those cultures over history that tried to artificially preserve their culture at whatever cost, like all those empty buildings in various places around the world? A culture naturally adapt and grows or dies.
In a free society with open borders, there is nothing to stop people from having racially segregated communities, as long as everyone who owned property in that community agreed to do that. Closed borders would hinder that very thing. What if some Nazi shithead wanted to import a wife from Austria? Or a black lady wanted to marry a African?
Open borders and respect for property rights would make it easier for people who want to segregate.