The Free Talk Live BBS

Free Talk Live => The Polling Pit => Topic started by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on November 25, 2008, 08:50:41 PM

Title: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on November 25, 2008, 08:50:41 PM
Just curious who/how many people here would pay for sex from a hooker or who has.

Personally, I would never pay for sex from a prostitute, but I wouldn't have anything against anyone who has or would.


My second question is:
How dirty of a trick would it be to pay for a hooker for a friend but never tell him she's a hooker until after he's taken her home with him and done the deed?
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on November 25, 2008, 08:51:56 PM
No, I wouldn't.

And that's pretty bad, dude. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on November 25, 2008, 08:56:09 PM
I do not advocate doing anything but joke around about doing the second question!
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: voodoo on November 25, 2008, 10:58:06 PM
Cause I'm free to do what want, any old time.  Yes I'm free, to do what I want, any old time.

(http://www.digitalshaman.net/Nevada%20Brothels%20Map_files/nvbrothels2.gif)

Don't be afraid of freedom!
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mike the godless heathen on November 25, 2008, 11:47:32 PM
where is the option for, "No, but if someone else goes to buy sex I really don't give a flip what they do with their life."
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Russell Griswold on November 25, 2008, 11:51:30 PM
I wouldn't.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: hellbilly on November 25, 2008, 11:57:57 PM
I would/will when I'm an old geezer who can no longer score by honest means.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: bad_cab on November 26, 2008, 12:11:12 AM
where is the option for, "No, but if someone else goes to buy sex I really don't give a flip what they do with their life."

I think the not giving a shit about what other people do can be assumed on this forum
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mike the godless heathen on November 26, 2008, 12:12:47 AM
i prefer definites as opposed to vagaries
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mikehz on November 26, 2008, 12:38:50 AM
I'll pass. I'm happy as things are.

I was once kidnapped and taken to a whore house. In Tijuana, it was. Me and a couple buddies climbed into a taxi, and then next thing we knew the driver pulled into a courtyard where these women yanked us out of the car and pulled us into rooms. Even at 18, I knew better than to screw around with a Tijuana hooker. But, the bouncer came in, and said, "Senor, you come to whore house, you must pay something." He took my wallet, pulled out a twenty, and gave me back the rest.

My friend Dwain got robbed, too. But, Gene--a sixty-year-old Italian--did not get robbed. He had a great time. In fact, because of his Italian, the Mexicans thought he was just a drunk Mexican.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: voodoo on November 26, 2008, 12:40:31 AM
I'll pass. I'm happy as things are.

I was once kidnapped and taken to a whore house. In Tijuana, it was. Me and a couple buddies climbed into a taxi, and then next thing we knew the driver pulled into a courtyard where these women yanked us out of the car and pulled us into rooms. Even at 18, I knew better than to screw around with a Tijuana hooker. But, the bouncer came in, and said, "Senor, you come to whore house, you must pay something." He took my wallet, pulled out a twenty, and gave me back the rest.

My friend Dwain got robbed, too. But, Gene--a sixty-year-old Italian--did not get robbed. He had a great time. In fact, because of his Italian, the Mexicans thought he was just a drunk Mexican.

Ah, TJ.  Good times.  Good times.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Taors on November 26, 2008, 08:23:48 AM
Cause I'm free to do what want, any old time.  Yes I'm free, to do what I want, any old time.

(http://www.digitalshaman.net/Nevada%20Brothels%20Map_files/nvbrothels2.gif)

Don't be afraid of freedom!

The Pussycat Saloon sounds like a wonderful place.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Porcupine_in_MA on November 26, 2008, 09:26:22 AM
I would/will when I'm an old geezer who can no longer score by honest means.

Paying for pussy isn't honest?
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: BonerJoe on November 26, 2008, 09:29:52 AM
Wives are afraid of whorehouses because it means they actually have to put in some effort.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: BonerJoe on November 26, 2008, 09:30:26 AM
I've been to Winnemucca 3 times and I've never noticed any whorehouses.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mikehz on November 26, 2008, 10:06:54 AM
I've been to Winnemucca 3 times and I've never noticed any whorehouses.

I was there a couple months ago. Nice town. I didn't see any "ranches," but then they might all be located out of town.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Laetitia on November 26, 2008, 10:17:40 AM
Wives are afraid of whorehouses because it means they actually have to put in some effort.

How so? I'd think the whorehouses would allow the wives to put the minimum effort, at least in that one area of the relationship.

Maybe wives should consider spending the whore money on maid service.  Might work for husbands who'd feel guilt about paying a professional, too. Their wife still has energy left at the end of the day, and nobody has to push kid crap and clutter out of the way as part of foreplay.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Stobrawa on November 26, 2008, 10:32:20 AM
Why pay when I can score for free? :P

People go broke trying to get it "for free". Depending on how often you're scoring "for free" and how many of those times are On The Margin for you, you might want to re-evaluate the puritanical stigma against prostitution as simple idealistic propaganda and go for a potentially more economical choice.

For some of us, of course, paying for sex from a woman of the caliber we would prefer is far less economical then just getting it "for free".

Don't be afraid of the math!
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Taors on November 26, 2008, 10:59:21 AM
Why pay when I can score for free? :P

People go broke trying to get it "for free". Depending on how often you're scoring "for free" and how many of those times are On The Margin for you, you might want to re-evaluate the puritanical stigma against prostitution as simple idealistic propaganda and go for a potentially more economical choice.

For some of us, of course, paying for sex from a woman of the caliber we would prefer is far less economical then just getting it "for free".

Don't be afraid of the math!

I mean literally for free, no buying of drinks, meals, movie tickets or other crap, just free sex.

Most of us haven't been blessed with 2 foot long penises.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Stobrawa on November 26, 2008, 12:03:20 PM
Why pay when I can score for free? :P

People go broke trying to get it "for free". Depending on how often you're scoring "for free" and how many of those times are On The Margin for you, you might want to re-evaluate the puritanical stigma against prostitution as simple idealistic propaganda and go for a potentially more economical choice.

For some of us, of course, paying for sex from a woman of the caliber we would prefer is far less economical then just getting it "for free".

Don't be afraid of the math!

I mean literally for free, no buying of drinks, meals, movie tickets or other crap, just free sex.

Most of us haven't been blessed with 2 foot long penises.

Sucks for you. I know mine is at least 2 ... oh wait ... you said 2 FOOT long...  nevermind ...
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on November 26, 2008, 05:32:06 PM
where is the option for, "No, but if someone else goes to buy sex I really don't give a flip what they do with their life."
That's not what the poll is about.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on November 26, 2008, 05:34:59 PM
Why pay when I can score for free? :P

People go broke trying to get it "for free". Depending on how often you're scoring "for free" and how many of those times are On The Margin for you, you might want to re-evaluate the puritanical stigma against prostitution as simple idealistic propaganda and go for a potentially more economical choice.

For some of us, of course, paying for sex from a woman of the caliber we would prefer is far less economical then just getting it "for free".

Don't be afraid of the math!

I mean literally for free, no buying of drinks, meals, movie tickets or other crap, just free sex.
Yeah, when you're in college its pretty easy to get some of this.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: bakerbaker on November 26, 2008, 06:28:36 PM
I chose option two.  maybe.  I'd have to be hitting up one of them brothels in NV.

and money would have to be no object.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: hellbilly on November 26, 2008, 10:08:52 PM
I would/will when I'm an old geezer who can no longer score by honest means.

Paying for pussy isn't honest?

Well, I suppose paying for it is about as honest as it can get! Thanks for clearing that up for me :)
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mike the godless heathen on November 26, 2008, 10:19:51 PM
but working for you pussy makes it me worthwhile.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Taors on November 26, 2008, 10:26:56 PM
but working for you pussy makes it me worthwhile.

...What?
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mikehz on November 26, 2008, 10:49:59 PM
That's half the reason for GOING to college.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on November 26, 2008, 10:57:00 PM
That's half the reason for GOING to college.

WAT

To grow up and get a good job so you can afford hookers that have treated their STDs?   :lol:
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mike the godless heathen on November 26, 2008, 11:32:13 PM
i thought you go to college so you can get girls drunk on cheap beer, ie natty light, and take advantage of them sexually for pretty much free?
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on November 26, 2008, 11:33:00 PM
i thought you go to college so you can get girls drunk on cheap beer, ie natty light, and take advantage of them sexually for pretty much free?

Sleezy.   :?
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mike the godless heathen on November 26, 2008, 11:34:27 PM
i thought you go to college so you can get girls drunk on cheap beer, ie natty light, and take advantage of them sexually for pretty much free?

Sleezy.   :?

i only went to a community college for about 3 quarters.  i never lived in dorms and do not consider this to be a worthwhile pastime.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: hellbilly on November 27, 2008, 12:01:28 AM
Did y'all hear about the lady who screwed a fella at a ball game in the mens room?

She was too drunk to know who she fucked.

Linked from Drudge..

http://www.twincities.com/ci_11075245?source=most_viewed
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mike the godless heathen on November 27, 2008, 12:04:42 AM
you ever read tucker max?  his story about going to vegas and having sex in the restroom with the door that had a darkening window when locked is awesome.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: hellbilly on November 27, 2008, 02:15:09 AM
I haven't read that story, or many others of his really, but I did like a lot of what I read from him. He has a pretty decent BBS too.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mike the godless heathen on November 27, 2008, 02:17:37 AM
he is so funny.

i highly recommend reading i hope they serve beer in hell
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on November 27, 2008, 02:19:55 AM
he is so funny.

i highly recommend reading i hope they serve beer in hell

I see that in the bookstore all the time, and I've always been curious.  Maybe I'll pick it up the next time I'm in, if I manage to remember. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mike the godless heathen on November 27, 2008, 02:27:38 AM
he is so funny.

i highly recommend reading i hope they serve beer in hell

I see that in the bookstore all the time, and I've always been curious.  Maybe I'll pick it up the next time I'm in, if I manage to remember. 

i laughed so hard i almost cried a few times.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on November 27, 2008, 02:28:59 AM
he is so funny.

i highly recommend reading i hope they serve beer in hell

I see that in the bookstore all the time, and I've always been curious.  Maybe I'll pick it up the next time I'm in, if I manage to remember. 

i laughed so hard i almost cried a few times.

Jen Lancaster's books do that to me, but it's more of a women's read. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: hellbilly on November 27, 2008, 02:31:31 AM
I remember on their forum a handicapped teenage boy who was trying to get Tucker to help him get laid.. but no one would commit because they didn't want to get in trouble for hooking a minor up.. do you know if the kid ever got some 'tang ?
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mike the godless heathen on November 27, 2008, 02:34:21 AM
i dont frequent his forums, so i couldnt tell you.

i found out about tucker from maddox's website.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Rillion on November 27, 2008, 03:11:41 AM
Sure, just for kicks....just to see what it's like.

Better a hooker than Tucker Max, anyway. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Rillion on November 27, 2008, 10:57:24 AM
I would.  Its one of my goals. 

But not a hooker.  A courtesan. 

Like so?
(http://www.english.uga.edu/cdesmet/jason/COURTES5.gif)
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: eVaL on November 27, 2008, 02:20:29 PM
I voted maybe, if I knew she was clean. But, there's really no telling. And, Richard has instilled in me a fear of tha herp that borderlines on neurosis.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Taors on November 27, 2008, 03:00:24 PM
I would.  Its one of my goals. 

But not a hooker.  A courtesan. 

Like so?
(http://www.english.uga.edu/cdesmet/jason/COURTES5.gif)

Almost. 

(http://collegeotr.s3.amazonaws.com/images/blogs/96db4394c266b5131cf4009a9066db34.jpg)

That chick reminds me of a certain somebody.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Level 20 Anklebiter on November 27, 2008, 03:54:45 PM
Yes if, 1. She was clean (both drug and disease free), 2. Looked half decent (being 6/10 and above is clearly a plus), 3. Had a good sense of humor and knew how to have a good time even out of bed (Why pay someone to bump uglies when it'll probably only last half and hour, make it more fun like an all night outing or some shit...), and 4. Knew how to grease the palm of the cops (always a plus when you're not a regular at dealing in the sex trade as a buyer. :-P).
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Rillion on November 27, 2008, 03:55:17 PM
Almost. 

(http://collegeotr.s3.amazonaws.com/images/blogs/96db4394c266b5131cf4009a9066db34.jpg)

What's courtesan-ish about her?  Looks like some random chick in a bar.  

I voted maybe, if I knew she was clean. But, there's really no telling. And, Richard has instilled in me a fear of tha herp that borderlines on neurosis.

Brothel hookers are more likely to be clean than random chicks in bars.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: eVaL on November 27, 2008, 04:38:39 PM
Almost. 

(http://collegeotr.s3.amazonaws.com/images/blogs/96db4394c266b5131cf4009a9066db34.jpg)

What's courtesan-ish about her?  Looks like some random chick in a bar.  

I voted maybe, if I knew she was clean. But, there's really no telling. And, Richard has instilled in me a fear of tha herp that borderlines on neurosis.

Brothel hookers are more likely to be clean than random chicks in bars.

Nope. Everyone in the world, except me, has herpes. (Damn you, Richard!)
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: BonerJoe on November 27, 2008, 04:44:23 PM
I gave Richard herpes.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Rillion on November 27, 2008, 05:50:06 PM
I gave Richard herpes.

Good on ya. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Russell Griswold on November 27, 2008, 05:55:16 PM
I gave Richard herpes.

Is that initiation of force?
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Laetitia on November 27, 2008, 06:50:49 PM
I gave Richard herpes.

Is that initiation of force?

I didn't see mention of BJ threatening Richard with herpes, so it must have just been part of the season of giving.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Russell Griswold on November 27, 2008, 06:57:05 PM
Good point, Joy. It's like a gift that keeps on giving.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: BonerJoe on November 27, 2008, 07:14:27 PM
I gave Richard herpes.

Is that initiation of force?

I didn't see mention of BJ threatening Richard with herpes, so it must have just been part of the season of giving.

Hehe.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on November 27, 2008, 09:21:11 PM
I gave Richard herpes.

Is that initiation of force?

I didn't see mention of BJ threatening Richard with herpes, so it must have just been part of the season of giving.

Hehe.

Oh God.   :lol:
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: freeAgent on November 30, 2008, 04:35:42 AM
I might if I was rich and desperate...maybe.  Actually, I don't think I would.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Taors on November 30, 2008, 08:31:52 AM
What if the hooker paid you?
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on December 01, 2008, 08:20:45 PM
What if the hooker paid you?
New option added to the poll
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: freeAgent on December 01, 2008, 11:30:08 PM
I might if I was rich and desperate...maybe.  Actually, I don't think I would.

I guess you'd also have to be rich and starving to dine in a fine restaurant? 

I'm not sure I follow you.  I would prefer to have sex with a non-prostitute by a very large margin.  In many ways, I prefer to have sex with myself than I would a prostitute.  I would have to be rich because I would only ever possibly want to pay for the Spitzer level of prostitute and you have to be rich to do that.

Eating good food, on the other hand, is something that I desire to do.  I prefer good food to bad food, and "fine dining" usually means good food.  It's also cheaper than the most expensive prostitutes.  So, no, I wouldn't have to be as rich or desperate in order to go to a nice restaurant.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: YixilTesiphon on December 02, 2008, 02:53:08 AM
Have you seen the Penn & Teller Bullshit! episode on prostitution? It's much cleaner when it's legal, just like drugs.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Rillion on December 02, 2008, 07:44:19 AM
Rillion yet again puts bad ideas into horny peoples' minds by saying brothel hookers are cleaner than chicks at the bar. The truth is the reason that brothel hookers are "cleaner" is because there is no way in hell that they would admit to having any kind of disease.

No, actually it is because brothel prostitutes are required as a condition of their job to have check-ups and go through the gamut of tests on a regular basis, inspect and wash mens' genitals before sex, and use condoms as if the world were made of them.     The average woman in a bar may do the latter, but almost certainly not the other two.   

I don't care if you disapprove of prostitution, but lying about it just makes you look like an idiot.   It's hilarious how many men freak out about the possibility of prostitutes having diseases without thinking about the fact that the prostitutes don't want to catch something from you, either. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: BonerJoe on December 02, 2008, 10:52:47 AM
I would never kiss a hooker.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mike the godless heathen on December 02, 2008, 02:17:38 PM
Rillion yet again puts bad ideas into horny peoples' minds by saying brothel hookers are cleaner than chicks at the bar. The truth is the reason that brothel hookers are "cleaner" is because there is no way in hell that they would admit to having any kind of disease.

No, actually it is because brothel prostitutes are required as a condition of their job to have check-ups and go through the gamut of tests on a regular basis, inspect and wash mens' genitals before sex, and use condoms as if the world were made of them.     The average woman in a bar may do the latter, but almost certainly not the other two.   

I don't care if you disapprove of prostitution, but lying about it just makes you look like an idiot.   It's hilarious how many men freak out about the possibility of prostitutes having diseases without thinking about the fact that the prostitutes don't want to catch something from you, either. 


ya right...the "Brothel Prostitutes" are regulated like the porn industry is "regulated". :roll:

When the porno star Bella Donna  quit the industry for a while cuz of a herpes spread scare on her body, porn insiders admitted that just about everyone has the herpes in the porno world.

You are spreading garbage and lies by suggesting that having sex with hookers does not come with an extreme risk. You are some kind of diabolical sex liar. Or you are just mighty dumb if you believe the damage control.

if i were to run a brothel, my prostitutes would be REQUIRED to submit monthly check up and screening reports from a doctor of MY choosing.  all records would be available for any customer to check.  if the women don't like it, then they wouldn't work for me.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on December 02, 2008, 02:18:30 PM
Having sex with anyone is risky without doing all of those screenings and junk.  In fact, sex is risky emotionally AND physically.  But if you're not willing to take the risk, so be it. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mike the godless heathen on December 02, 2008, 02:20:13 PM
Having sex with anyone is risky without doing all of those screenings and junk.  In fact, sex is risky emotionally AND physically.  But if you're not willing to take the risk, so be it. 

i could tell you a story.

oh man.  it is a bad one at that.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on December 02, 2008, 02:21:03 PM
Having sex with anyone is risky without doing all of those screenings and junk.  In fact, sex is risky emotionally AND physically.  But if you're not willing to take the risk, so be it. 

i could tell you a story.

oh man.  it is a bad one at that.

I'm WAITING. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mike the godless heathen on December 02, 2008, 02:22:11 PM
Having sex with anyone is risky without doing all of those screenings and junk.  In fact, sex is risky emotionally AND physically.  But if you're not willing to take the risk, so be it. 

i could tell you a story.

oh man.  it is a bad one at that.

I'm WAITING. 

different story.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on December 02, 2008, 02:51:53 PM
That just means I'm waiting for two stories now. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: voodoo on December 02, 2008, 03:21:26 PM
if i were to run a brothel, my prostitutes would be REQUIRED to submit monthly check up and screening reports from a doctor of MY choosing.  all records would be available for any customer to check.  if the women don't like it, then they wouldn't work for me.

If you lived in a place where they didn't shoot at you quite so often for acting like an adult and making adult decisions, you wouldn't have any business.  All the customers would go to Nevada where we test every week.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: freeAgent on December 02, 2008, 09:15:50 PM
I might if I was rich and desperate...maybe.  Actually, I don't think I would.

I guess you'd also have to be rich and starving to dine in a fine restaurant? 

I'm not sure I follow you.  I would prefer to have sex with a non-prostitute by a very large margin.  In many ways, I prefer to have sex with myself than I would a prostitute.  I would have to be rich because I would only ever possibly want to pay for the Spitzer level of prostitute and you have to be rich to do that.

Eating good food, on the other hand, is something that I desire to do.  I prefer good food to bad food, and "fine dining" usually means good food.  It's also cheaper than the most expensive prostitutes.  So, no, I wouldn't have to be as rich or desperate in order to go to a nice restaurant.

You obviously view the profession as distasteful and its practitioners as beneath you.  I'm not passing judgment on that, because its none of my business where your head's at.  This is just convo.  But its worth pointing out that prostitution is basically an alternative lifestyle, and there are skanks in every facet of life.  That doesn't mean I'd go for a $20 whore myself, either.  I'd probably do the homework and go for the high-end chicks, for safety and talent and looks.  But that doesn't mean every chick who does it for a few hundred bucks is trash.  Some of 'em do it for kicks because the money is a slut-rush, its a legitimate kink for some girls to dabble in being paid for their pussy.  Its basically the same reason some girls will finger-fuck themselves on Girls Gone Wild for a t-shirt, when they normally wouldn't give you the time of day if you begged on your hands and knees.  

I think you misunderstand me.  I don't view prostitutes as beneath me.  I just don't want to get an STD, and chances are much greater that a prostitute has an STD than a non-prostitute.  My primary concern here is STDs.  Secondary to that would be the lack of emotional ties, which I also find important.  However, that alone certainly wouldn't keep me from paying for sex...again, that goes back to not being interested in getting an STD.  If I could be guaranteed that a hooker doesn't have an STD, then I wouldn't have much of a problem with paying for sex.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on December 03, 2008, 02:48:41 AM
I'm glad I produced a productive thread! :D
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: hellbilly on December 03, 2008, 02:58:23 AM
It better produce more or I'm gonna STICK it!
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: MacFall on December 03, 2008, 07:25:58 AM
If I actually live to be a 40 year old virgin, I might consider it. But I still have 15 and a half years against that possibility.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mike the godless heathen on December 03, 2008, 01:13:19 PM
If I actually live to be a 40 year old virgin, I might consider it. But I still have 15 and a half years against that possibility.

how would you feel about someone else buying you a hooker?
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Taors on December 03, 2008, 02:00:29 PM
If I actually live to be a 40 year old virgin, I might consider it. But I still have 15 and a half years against that possibility.

Duuuude.  :(

Think of all that hot tail. 15 and a half years worth of hot, succulent tail.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: BonerJoe on December 03, 2008, 03:36:08 PM
If I actually live to be a 40 year old virgin, I might consider it. But I still have 15 and a half years against that possibility.

Duuuude.  :(

MacFall is what happens when you try and be an Xian and an Anarchist at the same time.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: MacFall on December 03, 2008, 08:50:59 PM
If I actually live to be a 40 year old virgin, I might consider it. But I still have 15 and a half years against that possibility.

Duuuude.  :(

MacFall is what happens when you try and be an Xian and an Anarchist at the same time.

No, it's what happens when you're a not very attractive nerd in an area that has almost no single young ladies.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: MacFall on December 03, 2008, 08:53:26 PM
If I actually live to be a 40 year old virgin, I might consider it. But I still have 15 and a half years against that possibility.

how would you feel about someone else buying you a hooker?

Just about the same. Sex doesn't mean all that much to me, unless it's within the context of a real relationship.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: MacFall on December 03, 2008, 08:57:18 PM
If I actually live to be a 40 year old virgin, I might consider it. But I still have 15 and a half years against that possibility.

how would you feel about someone else buying you a hooker?

Just about the same. Sex doesn't mean all that much to me, unless it's within the context of a real relationship.

You don't miss what you've never had.

Yeah, basically. And I'm pretty sure that if I start doing it now for its own sake, then it won't mean anything to me when I finally do have a relationship.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Cyro on December 03, 2008, 08:58:27 PM
If I actually live to be a 40 year old virgin, I might consider it. But I still have 15 and a half years against that possibility.

how would you feel about someone else buying you a hooker?

Just about the same. Sex doesn't mean all that much to me, unless it's within the context of a real relationship.

You don't miss what you've never had.

Yeah, basically. And I'm pretty sure that if I start doing it now for its own sake, then it won't mean anything to me when I finally do have a relationship.

Seperating the concepts of "love" and "sex" isn't necessarily a bad thing. I think it gives you a deeper understanding on what love actually means to you.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Taors on December 03, 2008, 09:22:54 PM
I think we all need to get MacFall laid at the FTL party next year.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mikehz on December 03, 2008, 11:09:52 PM
The hell you say!  :shock:

And I think I'm starving if I go three days!
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: YixilTesiphon on December 03, 2008, 11:20:39 PM
I think we all need to get MacFall laid at the FTL party next year.

I need to get laid pretty badly too.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on December 03, 2008, 11:23:15 PM
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Nigel, we gonna git you LAID! 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Taors on December 04, 2008, 09:13:29 AM
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Nigel, we gonna git you LAID! 

If someone puts up their vagina...
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Rillion on December 04, 2008, 05:36:05 PM
Rillion yet again puts bad ideas into horny peoples' minds by saying brothel hookers are cleaner than chicks at the bar. The truth is the reason that brothel hookers are "cleaner" is because there is no way in hell that they would admit to having any kind of disease.

No, actually it is because brothel prostitutes are required as a condition of their job to have check-ups and go through the gamut of tests on a regular basis, inspect and wash mens' genitals before sex, and use condoms as if the world were made of them.     The average woman in a bar may do the latter, but almost certainly not the other two.   

I don't care if you disapprove of prostitution, but lying about it just makes you look like an idiot.   It's hilarious how many men freak out about the possibility of prostitutes having diseases without thinking about the fact that the prostitutes don't want to catch something from you, either. 


ya right...the "Brothel Prostitutes" are regulated like the porn industry is "regulated". :roll:

When the porno star Bella Donna  quit the industry for a while cuz of a herpes spread scare on her body, porn insiders admitted that just about everyone has the herpes in the porno world.

You are spreading garbage and lies by suggesting that having sex with hookers does not come with an extreme risk. You are some kind of diabolical sex liar. Or you are just mighty dumb if you believe the damage control.

1.  I did not say that sex with hookers does not come with an extreme risk.  Sex with anybody can come with an extreme risk.  Sex with you, for example, would carry the extreme risk of self-loathing likely leading to immediate suicide. 

2.  Brothels ! = porn.  They both usually involve women having sex, but that's about it. 

3.  What I did say is that Nevada brothel prostitutes are required to get tested regularly and take careful precautions, which is a fact no matter what you blather in response. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Rillion on December 05, 2008, 02:33:17 PM
1. You are stupid.

Obviously false.  You should pick on something that might actually be true, such as the possibility that I'm ugly.  I'm not, but there's room for doubt on an internet forum.  I suppose it doesn't really matter, though, because either insult makes you sound like a third grader.  "I've got nothing, so.....you're a big stupid-head!" 

Quote
2. You wish that I would have sex with you.

Yes, I have a secret overwhelming desire to sleep with people who wish anal herpes upon me and think that women are dirty vehicles of sin for not wanting to become baby factories.  You've discovered my deepest, darkest fetish.  Congratulations!

Quote
3. You admitted to being on birth control for some 16 plus years.

15, actually.  I'm looking forward to at least 40 more.  Shall I write you next anniversary? 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: CaL DaVe on December 10, 2008, 05:03:06 PM
I might if I was rich and desperate...maybe.  Actually, I don't think I would.

I guess you'd also have to be rich and starving to dine in a fine restaurant? 

I'm not sure I follow you.  I would prefer to have sex with a non-prostitute by a very large margin.  In many ways, I prefer to have sex with myself than I would a prostitute.  I would have to be rich because I would only ever possibly want to pay for the Spitzer level of prostitute and you have to be rich to do that.

Eating good food, on the other hand, is something that I desire to do.  I prefer good food to bad food, and "fine dining" usually means good food.  It's also cheaper than the most expensive prostitutes.  So, no, I wouldn't have to be as rich or desperate in order to go to a nice restaurant.

You obviously view the profession as distasteful and its practitioners as beneath you.  I'm not passing judgment on that, because its none of my business where your head's at.  This is just convo.  But its worth pointing out that prostitution is basically an alternative lifestyle, and there are skanks in every facet of life.  That doesn't mean I'd go for a $20 whore myself, either.  I'd probably do the homework and go for the high-end chicks, for safety and talent and looks.  But that doesn't mean every chick who does it for a few hundred bucks is trash.  Some of 'em do it for kicks because the money is a slut-rush, its a legitimate kink for some girls to dabble in being paid for their pussy.  Its basically the same reason some girls will finger-fuck themselves on Girls Gone Wild for a t-shirt, when they normally wouldn't give you the time of day if you begged on your hands and knees.  

I think you misunderstand me.  I don't view prostitutes as beneath me.  I just don't want to get an STD, and chances are much greater that a prostitute has an STD than a non-prostitute.  My primary concern here is STDs.  Secondary to that would be the lack of emotional ties, which I also find important.  However, that alone certainly wouldn't keep me from paying for sex...again, that goes back to not being interested in getting an STD.  If I could be guaranteed that a hooker doesn't have an STD, then I wouldn't have much of a problem with paying for sex.

http://www.cat69.com/desires.html
:shock:

*bookmarks*

Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Rillion on December 10, 2008, 05:28:17 PM
http://www.cat69.com/desires.html

A place where girls can be "reserved" ahead of time, where they are selected for being "of a more humble persona," where "this is much more than just a sexual service, you will be sleeping with your girl, waking up with your girl, having breakfast, enjoying activities, etc."  Where "our girls set no limits to the intimacy of your experience treating you more as a lover, rather than a client. . . The girls we work with are definitely not "pros" in this field and we will not get into any discussions about specific sexual services."

Hmmm.....

Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: bakerbaker on December 10, 2008, 08:56:49 PM
http://www.cat69.com/desires.html

A place where girls can be "reserved" ahead of time, where they are selected for being "of a more humble persona," where "this is much more than just a sexual service, you will be sleeping with your girl, waking up with your girl, having breakfast, enjoying activities, etc."  Where "our girls set no limits to the intimacy of your experience treating you more as a lover, rather than a client. . . The girls we work with are definitely not "pros" in this field and we will not get into any discussions about specific sexual services."

Hmmm.....

Maybe I'm being clueless, but what exactly is the point you're implicating here?

They have herpes in their ass.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: bakerbaker on December 10, 2008, 09:46:13 PM
Rillion seems to be on some marathon posting run where it is her goal to get everyone to ask her "What she means". This gives the psuedo-intellectual all kinds of ego-power, and she loves to feel superior. I know all this, cuz I employ the technique, on occasion, myself.

It's getting you all hot and bothered, isn't it?
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on December 10, 2008, 09:46:54 PM
Rillion seems to be on some marathon posting run where it is her goal to get everyone to ask her "What she means". This gives the psuedo-intellectual all kinds of ego-power, and she loves to feel superior. I know all this, cuz I employ the technique, on occasion, myself.

It's getting you all hot and bothered, isn't it?

That's just his balls swelling up. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Russell Griswold on December 10, 2008, 09:47:42 PM
I think my balls are swelling up too.  :(
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on December 10, 2008, 09:48:08 PM
I think my balls are swelling up too.  :(

From...WHAT?   :shock:
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Russell Griswold on December 10, 2008, 09:49:39 PM
I think my balls are swelling up too.  :(

From...WHAT?   :shock:

Not enough affection.  :lol:
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: rabidfurby on December 10, 2008, 09:50:44 PM
It can happen easier than you might think.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on December 10, 2008, 09:51:26 PM
I think my balls are swelling up too.  :(

From...WHAT?   :shock:

Not enough affection.  :lol:

I keep trying to hand deliver myself to him wrapped in a bow and everything but he keeps telling me no.  Do not listen to him.   :lol:

Richard, slap some sense in to this man.   :P
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Russell Griswold on December 10, 2008, 09:53:35 PM
The room looks empty right now. Oh so empty... MAH POOR BAWLS!!!  :shock:
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on December 10, 2008, 09:59:00 PM
PROTIP:  Don't get a hooker. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mikehz on December 10, 2008, 10:33:03 PM
With the advent of robotics and realistic female dolls, I predict that sometime soon some enterprising soul will combine the two. Bordellos featuring anrobotic women will then be possible, with the machines sterilized between customers. (At least, one would hope!)

I cannot imagine that this would be illegal.

Would you visit a fully functional, robotic prostitute?
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Rillion on December 10, 2008, 10:33:46 PM
http://www.cat69.com/desires.html

A place where girls can be "reserved" ahead of time, where they are selected for being "of a more humble persona," where "this is much more than just a sexual service, you will be sleeping with your girl, waking up with your girl, having breakfast, enjoying activities, etc."  Where "our girls set no limits to the intimacy of your experience treating you more as a lover, rather than a client. . . The girls we work with are definitely not "pros" in this field and we will not get into any discussions about specific sexual services."

Hmmm.....

Maybe I'm being clueless, but what exactly is the point you're implicating here?

Maybe she thinks it sounds great!

But I'm thinking she's implying a sort of semi-voluntary white slavery or indentured servitude.  Flesh trade.  I was suspicious at first, too. 

Well, not necessarily, but the things I quoted from the FAQ did make me think "Okay, so what did they mean by that?"  Particularly the last two bits.

I can't help but think of this in terms of what it must be like for the girls working there, of course.  And honestly, it sounds......weird.   They sound like geishas, in a way-- not just for sex, but as temporary "girlfriends" for three or four days.  Which is not necessarily a bad thing, just very non-standard.  I'm just imagining a guy showing up for this, getting together with the girl he reserved according to her photo on the web site....okay.....and then the next morning they wake up and go to breakfast.  And talk about.....what?  I sent the link to my boyfriend, and joked that they should put on the web site that the girls have different areas of expertise or knowledge, so that you could choose Tammy who specializes in American history and home repair, or Aimee who specializes in moral philosophy and has an encyclopedic knowledge of past episodes of Futurama, or whatever.  Maybe they put that stuff in the newsletters you have to pay to get, I don't know.   Boyfriend suggested that if I bought him a trip for Christmas he would go and find out for me.  I said I'd get right on that as soon as I win the lottery.  "Research" is the best excuse for anything.  

What actually worries me, though, is 1) being able to reserve girls, without any mention of the girls having a right of refusal, 2) such emphasis on the girls being "humble," and 3) "no limits on the intimacy of your experience." Which means......what?  That you're allowed to do whatever you want with her and she can't say no?  I sure hope not, but the FAQ is vague as hell so it's hard to say.  I'm not saying that this is a clear example of unwilling prostitution, but the thought did  cross my mind.  At the very least, I wish they had been more careful to make clear that it's not.  If I were a guy considering going there, that would be my top concern.  If the reality is that the girls actually do  have a great deal of control over how much they work, and when, and who they sleep with, then honestly it sounds like a great deal for them.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Rillion on December 10, 2008, 10:40:44 PM
Rillion says that I wish Herpes on her, which is not true, and she will never find a statement saying that I wished herpes on her, but she keeps saying it.

You realize that the things you say here get recorded, right? 

When you get the herpes in yer ass, all yer fancy coooooool talk, will come to an end, babe.

I did a search for posts you made and the word "herpes," and about fifty threads came up.  It took me about .05 seconds to find this.  Seek mental help.  Really. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on December 10, 2008, 11:39:31 PM
With the advent of robotics and realistic female dolls, I predict that sometime soon some enterprising soul will combine the two. Bordellos featuring anrobotic women will then be possible, with the machines sterilized between customers. (At least, one would hope!)

I cannot imagine that this would be illegal.

Would you visit a fully functional, robotic prostitute?
Sounds like a great idea for a new poll
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: MacFall on December 11, 2008, 12:07:38 AM

I cannot imagine that this would be illegal.


Then your imagination sucks.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: hellbilly on December 11, 2008, 02:00:49 AM
Speaking of birth control- did y'all see a recent headline that "The male sex really is the weaker sex" ?

Due to hormones and chemicals in fresh water supplies of some areas, some male frogs and turtles are developing female characteristics and are developing smaller penises. The same is said to be true of some males born to mothers who are exposed to a lot of chemicals in plastics and hormones in food.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Dylboz on December 11, 2008, 11:06:01 AM
One of the unfortunate effects of modern society is that it coddles the dumb well into adulthood. They survive in a counter-Darwinian fashion, because well, we just can't kill 'em.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Rillion on December 11, 2008, 12:58:44 PM
It goes about $4k for 4 days.  For $6k, you get a menage a trois, and upgraded room. But still for 4 days.  Or, you can lengthen your stay for about a grand per day.  So most guys would spend the 6 on 6 days, and not the fancy room.  They are more like courtesans.  You could switch chicks all day long if you want.  They hang at the pool and if not spoken for, take one and abscond to your room.  She can refuse if she thinks you're a dick.  She would probably be discrete and say she doesn't feel good right now, then try to avoid you by hooking up with a better prospect.  Or outright refuse, but that would be drastic.  

Some don't speak english, some do.  I don't expect you'd get much mental stimulation from them because of the language barrier, but they're probably more (or equally as mature from the better examples) mature than their American counterparts, simply due to exposure of a less restrictive and uptight society.  Plus, the rules are out of whack, so they're probably on a sex binge, being young and all.  Intoxicated by the freedom of the surroundings.  

Would you really want to have sex with somebody who doesn't speak English?  I would hope she at least knows the English word "No."  And lack of ability to speak the same language pretty much makes that whole "girlfriend for a few days" concept fall flat.  

I took this Viking place and turned it around in my head to contemplate what a female version would be like.  It would never exist, of course-- I don't even think Heidi Fleiss's male brothel got off the ground (and why should it?  She came out and said that it would not cater to gay men in any way, which dooms it right there).   But my version of Viking would be filled with guys who have PhDs in various subjects and are very extroverted when it comes to talking about their subject areas.   And I'd go for one day, max.   :lol:

Ah, hell, even that probably wouldn't be much fun.  I think my feelings would just be too much hurt by the idea of sleeping with someone who wouldn't sleep with me unless I paid them.  Gee, you think this is why there aren't more prostitutes that cater to women?  :)
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Russell Griswold on December 11, 2008, 02:28:02 PM

Speaking of birth control- did y'all see a recent headline that "The male sex really is the weaker sex" ?

Due to hormones and chemicals in fresh water supplies of some areas, some male frogs and turtles are developing female characteristics and are developing smaller penises. The same is said to be true of some males born to mothers who are exposed to a lot of chemicals in plastics and hormones in food.

This is great news for my genetically altered large-cocked frog farm. 

You'll make millions!
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Rillion on December 11, 2008, 04:32:09 PM
Would you really want to have sex with somebody who doesn't speak English?  I would hope she at least knows the English word "No."  And lack of ability to speak the same language pretty much makes that whole "girlfriend for a few days" concept fall flat.  

Why not?  You grabbed on to the "GF for a few days" concept and it warped the perception of it.  Let it go.  They're just people.  Are you suggesting you're supposed to remain distant and cold from an attractive woman, continually remind her she is a prostitute, and perform the base act while a kitchen timer ticks on the table?

Huh?  I was going by what the web site said.  And how the hell did you get any of that from the simple statement that it would be better if she speaks English?

Geez.  How very cold and callous of me for thinking it's better if you can have a basic conversation with the person you're about to fuck. 

Quote
You should be comfortable with the person you're gonna fuck

Yeah, that would be my point. 

Quote
You were in Europe, you tell me:  Have you ever met someone in Europe who came from a country where you could absolutely not communicate at all?  

If I'm going to have sex with someone, I prefer to set the bar of communication a tad higher than facial expressions and reaching for things.  Call me strange. 

Quote
I noticed you mention the emotion in there, which is where men and women differ, in some ways.  Chicks like a story with their sex/porn/etc., details and emotional compatibility.  Guys are much the opposite, where they often prefer their fantasy to become reality without the distractions of permanence or fact.  Thats why we'll spend a half-million dollars on a showpiece exotic car and only drive it in perfect conditions.  Thats stupid, but it is beautiful, the girl will say.  So what if it can do 200mph, you can't drive like that.  And it can't carry groceries.  They immediately blend the impracticality of the fact with the beauty of the fantasy.  There is not a guy on earth who would sit in the seat of a Detomaso Pantera and adjust the mirror, and say "This car is stupid, theres no cup holders."  

I think it's actually something much more basic: Guys don't give nearly as much of a shit how much the person they're sleeping with cares about them. 

Quote
They're just chicks, its just sex, and its just money.  But theres a little more to it than that.  Prostitution should be legal.  In a legal environment, it changes the attitude of it.  But legal or not, I could go get a blowjob right now, if I wanted one.  Theres massage parlors here, or I could call an "escort".  But that would be boring.  I'd probably have that ripped-off feeling you get when you get a lapdance.  I'm more attuned to environments and I hate looking at clocks.  I think thats the hottest part of the Viking thing, is the extended relaxed atmosphere where you don't give a shit about anything while these knockouts drift around.  Paradise.  

I can see how that would be obviously preferable, but I wouldn't apply the word "paradise" unless they're drifting around for reasons other than being paid for it.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Rillion on December 11, 2008, 07:33:03 PM
I guess all the other things you pay for are legitimate. 

Why is there a line of emotion for sex, again? 

Oh, because you think its necessary to have sexual enjoyment with emotion attached, but every other activity is okay to pay for.  Think of all the fools who pay for dance lessons and school, when you can get that for free, too. 

Please point out where I ever said it was illegitimate.  I didn't.  I said I don't consider it paradise.

And yes, I will always prefer sex with someone who has sex with me because they want to as opposed to someone I'm paying to do so.   You're not going to get me to apologize for that, or feel even remotely bad about it. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on December 12, 2008, 04:35:17 AM
By saying that I have "condemned all women for birth control" shows where yer mind is at. What I am saying is sour philosophical medicine for when females hate their bodies. I am being misogynistic for promoting natural female functioning!??!? In reality, Birth control relegates females to living & breathing masturbatory aids, which is the sort of thing that misogynists desire. When it comes down to it, I am actually a better "feminist" than Our Dear Rillion.

Did you wake up one morning and were suddenly this retarded, 'cause I can't envision you surviving childhood if you've always been this stupid.

If a female on birth control is not a masturbatory aid, then what is she: a female on birth control? I don't think so. Think how lucky you filthy dogs are...you get to have sex with a living breathing female that can't get pregnant (well...most of the time). Isn't that so cooooooooool??? Why settle for a fleshlight, yer right hand, a Real Doll, when you can just give her a pill, and fill her up, then tell yer buddies, so they pat you on the back and make you feel good about yourself. One of the main benefits here is that yer masturbatory aid is actually capable of cleaning herself up.....isn't that sooooooo awesome??? You just have to fuck "her"....she'll take care of the rest of the stuff. WHOA!!!!!!! AWESOMENESS!!!!

You filthy mutts smacking yer heads up against the trash cans, under the moonlight, make me laugh.
I happen to like masturbatory aids.  And why are you treating objects like women?
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mikehz on December 12, 2008, 11:49:04 AM
It's a myth that the purpose for sex is simply for reproduction. The activity helps strengthen the pair bond.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Rillion on December 12, 2008, 12:50:02 PM
Prostitution is not a surrogate for dating or relationships, the only similarities are the physical sex act.

Prostitution is whatever people want it to be, so long as it also involves the direct exchange of money for sex.  Some people are emotional about it; some are not. But that's not a simple difference between women and men-- there are brothel prostitutes and even strippers who get men who become very attached to them and even limit their patronage to specific women, thinking of the attachment as much more than a monetary exchange.  You know this, of course. 

Quote
I noticed you use the phrase 'sleeping with' as a substitute for fucking in terminology.  To me, "sleeping with" indicates repetitive intimacies with a potential future, or at least a mutual agreement for no reason other than desire...  Although it is worth mentioning the context of 'sleeping with' in a negative connotation often suggests something manipulative for the benefit of the woman.  If a man is sleeping with someone, its casual.  If a woman is sleeping with someone, she's got a reason.  Men do not 'sleep with' professionals, even if they do sleep together.  The flaw in all this is you keep looking at it through the lens of emotion. 

No, I think the flaw in all of this is that you keep speaking as if there's some kind of firm and impenetrable difference between men and women, as if individual men and women don't dash across that boundary every day, in different aspects of their personalities and at different times.  Try talking to me like I'm myself, rather than the physical incarnation of Femalekind-- I already know all of the generalizations about how men think vs. how women think.  By "sleeping with," I mean "having sexual intercourse with."   It honestly doesn't matter to me what terminology you prefer. 

Quote
The question is, why would you consider the irrelevant details of a consensual transaction to make it more or less acceptable? 

Why would you fail to see the invisible blue pony?

Obviously I don't consider communication irrelevant, even or especially in this specific context.  The fact that you do is immaterial to my reasons for doing things. 

Quote
Fluent communication is only essential if you expect more than fucking

In your opinion.  It's certainly possible to fuck without fluent communication, but I don't want to do it.

Quote
The irony is that I exclude myself from unhealthy relationships and have never paid for sex, while it goes on all around me, but I'm the asshole because I condone whatever works for anyone who wants it - as long as both parties are in basic agreement.

First of all, I agreed  with you on that, and secondly I never called you an asshole....although I'm tempted to now because you're putting words in my mouth as well as assuming that I should want the same things you want.  That would be why I said I refuse to apologize for my preferences. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Harry Tuttle on December 12, 2008, 08:44:49 PM
No. *

* With the following caveat:

When I am 125 years old, look like yoda, can barely see or hear, am in and out of coherence, seldom remember my own grandchildren, and have done everything else I ever wanted to do in life...

... I am going to Las Vegas to blow a large amount of money on vast excesses of <insert name of most awesome drug that Ian Freeman recommends to me>, whiskey, cigars, and a troupe of call-girls in a "last tour of the battlefield" a-la Scent of a Woman. (HOO YAH!!)

If about 6 days of that doesn't finish me off, I will go back home to my rocking chair by the koi pond and wait for whatever the fates have in store. Of course, none of that applies if technology makes becoming an immortal cyborg a viable option.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on December 12, 2008, 09:02:14 PM
I think of Dick3 when I take my birth control.   :P
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Russell Griswold on December 12, 2008, 09:07:33 PM
I think of Dick3 when I take my birth control.   :P

I think of him whenever I see gloves.  :shock:
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on December 12, 2008, 09:08:07 PM
I think of Dick3 when I take my birth control.   :P

I think of him whenever I see gloves.  :shock:

Being that it's the middle of winter in Chicago, you have my condolences. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Russell Griswold on December 12, 2008, 09:24:34 PM
I think of Dick3 when I take my birth control.   :P

I think of him whenever I see gloves.  :shock:

Being that it's the middle of winter in Chicago, you have my condolences. 

Thank you.  :lol:
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mikehz on December 13, 2008, 12:27:22 PM
No. *

* With the following caveat:

When I am 125 years old, look like yoda, can barely see or hear, am in and out of coherence, seldom remember my own grandchildren, and have done everything else I ever wanted to do in life...

... I am going to Las Vegas to blow a large amount of money on vast excesses of <insert name of most awesome drug that Ian Freeman recommends to me>, whiskey, cigars, and a troupe of call-girls in a "last tour of the battlefield" a-la Scent of a Woman. (HOO YAH!!)

If about 6 days of that doesn't finish me off, I will go back home to my rocking chair by the koi pond and wait for whatever the fates have in store. Of course, none of that applies if technology makes becoming an immortal cyborg a viable option.

By that time, you're going to be finished well before the first day is up. "Sorry, girls. It's nap time. And, Matlock is on later, so just leave."
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Rillion on December 13, 2008, 12:50:05 PM
Why would you fail to see the invisible blue pony?

Because its not there.  

Precisely. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Russell Griswold on December 13, 2008, 02:17:03 PM
Like Beethoven?
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Russell Griswold on December 14, 2008, 02:35:38 AM
Richard, let me put in Victorian terms:
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bc/VictorianPostcard.jpg)
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: MasterShake on December 14, 2008, 11:17:33 AM
all I know is that my wife is terrible in bed and is never horny, so hell yeah Id pay for a hooker, if she was clean.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Rillion on December 14, 2008, 12:21:22 PM
Neither of us going to have kids anyway, so you're just full of shit.

Yep, that's all about you can say to Richard.  It doesn't seem to have occurred to him that the human population is in no way endangered, and the last people who should be having kids are the ones who don't want to.  He just reverts to broken record. 
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: YesWeCan! on December 14, 2008, 02:17:41 PM

Mother Nature demands that the ladies let the blood flow in copious amounts, and when the blood is running down their legs, the gods will awaken and prepare the womb for The Divine Children of Hermes.

YES!  YES!  YES!

Oh, God, Richard...reading this thread as well as your post-history has convinced me.  Such beautifully thoughtful and logical words coming from such a wonderful soul.  From this day forth, I shall be going off the birth control Forever!!!  Oh, and then I just can't wait until I start menstruating again!  My boyfriend will come home from work and I'll tell him to fuck me.  Yes, I'll tell him to fuck me harder than he's ever fucked me before.  I'm gonna jump right on top of his cock before he even has a chance to pull a condom out of his pocket.  OOOOHH, YES!  I can just feel the blood running down my legs now!
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Harry Tuttle on December 14, 2008, 03:20:50 PM
No. *

* With the following caveat:

When I am 125 years old, look like yoda, can barely see or hear, am in and out of coherence, seldom remember my own grandchildren, and have done everything else I ever wanted to do in life...

... I am going to Las Vegas to blow a large amount of money on vast excesses of <insert name of most awesome drug that Ian Freeman recommends to me>, whiskey, cigars, and a troupe of call-girls in a "last tour of the battlefield" a-la Scent of a Woman. (HOO YAH!!)

If about 6 days of that doesn't finish me off, I will go back home to my rocking chair by the koi pond and wait for whatever the fates have in store. Of course, none of that applies if technology makes becoming an immortal cyborg a viable option.

By that time, you're going to be finished well before the first day is up. "Sorry, girls. It's nap time. And, Matlock is on later, so just leave."

Way to rain on the parade Mike! Now you have shattered the fantasy and there will be nothing to keep me going past age 117 unless I  produce more offspring to give me many more lives through which to live vicariously.  :)
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: conrad from spain on December 14, 2008, 06:16:28 PM
What about getting a hooker and taking her to a swinger's club and telling everybody she's your wife?
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Lindsey on December 14, 2008, 06:28:12 PM
all I know is that my wife is terrible in bed and is never horny, so hell yeah Id pay for a hooker, if she was clean.

... :shock:
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: rabidfurby on December 14, 2008, 07:02:40 PM
What about getting a hooker and taking her to a swinger's club and telling everybody she's your wife?

So I'm assuming she makes the best goddamn sammiches in the world, or you would have divorced her ass already?
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: conrad from spain on December 14, 2008, 07:05:30 PM

One of life's little secrets is that "safe sex" is bullshit, anywayz. The more you do it, the more you raise the chances of something going "wrong", and having what The Dictionary of Skank calls an "accident". But not to worry, right above it is a word called "abortion".

And if birth control and abortions fail, they're is always infanticide!
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on December 14, 2008, 07:52:25 PM
What about getting a hooker and taking her to a swinger's club and telling everybody she's your wife?
Sounds like a great idea.  Almost as great as the one proposed in the OP
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mikehz on December 14, 2008, 10:22:45 PM
What about getting a hooker and taking her to a swinger's club and telling everybody she's your wife?
Sounds like a great idea.  Almost as great as the one proposed in the OP

They're called "escorts."
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: Ben on December 15, 2008, 07:38:35 AM
at the rate I'm going, I'm going to have to pay a hooker.

So yeh, I would.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: WallyC33 on December 30, 2008, 03:00:44 AM
You can get a blowjob for 20 dollars in Omaha, NE. 13th and Ames on the north side. They always ask you to give them a ride to the crack house after though. I had one share her crack with me once and that was cool. One time, when I reached in my pocket, I only had 7 dollars (I left my wallet at home). She asked me if I had any more and I pulles out the change in my console (67 cents). She thought for a moment and jumped in the car. Crazy bitches.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: WallyC33 on December 30, 2008, 03:45:26 AM
A couple days ago:

It was midnight, and I was walking to the subway, and the wind was howling like a starving wolf as Hemingway sat crunched over his typewriter. Some chick stopped me on the way, and starting saying some things that I could not really understand. She had a scarf over her mouth, and I noticed these grotesque blue bubbles all over her cheek bones. If you took those mystery blue bubbles away, I reckon she was hot, but what the fuck were those blue bubbles about??!!? Is that what happens when you do meth? Was it Leprosy? I don't know what it was, but it looked really bad. I'm not sure but I think she said something along the lines of, "Excuse me sir. I'm really hungry. Can you help me? I can do things for you." I responded in the typical way I do when fucked up people approach me on the streets by sayin, "I'm sorry, miss." and walked away. If she didn't have those insane blue bubbles on her face, I might have asked her to repeat herself to make it clear as to whether she was looking to exchange sex for something.

You have to be very selective and NEVER do anything that involves a vagina. Only blowjobs.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: mikehz on December 30, 2008, 11:41:21 AM
A couple days ago:

It was midnight, and I was walking to the subway, and the wind was howling like a starving wolf as Hemingway sat crunched over his typewriter. Some chick stopped me on the way, and starting saying some things that I could not really understand. She had a scarf over her mouth, and I noticed these grotesque blue bubbles all over her cheek bones. If you took those mystery blue bubbles away, I reckon she was hot, but what the fuck were those blue bubbles about??!!? Is that what happens when you do meth? Was it Leprosy? I don't know what it was, but it looked really bad. I'm not sure but I think she said something along the lines of, "Excuse me sir. I'm really hungry. Can you help me? I can do things for you." I responded in the typical way I do when fucked up people approach me on the streets by sayin, "I'm sorry, miss." and walked away. If she didn't have those insane blue bubbles on her face, I might have asked her to repeat herself to make it clear as to whether she was looking to exchange sex for something.

You have to be very selective and NEVER do anything that involves a vagina. Only blowjobs.

Yeah, because the mouth is SO much cleaner.  :roll:

You know, they DO make condoms.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: WallyC33 on December 30, 2008, 02:58:36 PM
A couple days ago:

It was midnight, and I was walking to the subway, and the wind was howling like a starving wolf as Hemingway sat crunched over his typewriter. Some chick stopped me on the way, and starting saying some things that I could not really understand. She had a scarf over her mouth, and I noticed these grotesque blue bubbles all over her cheek bones. If you took those mystery blue bubbles away, I reckon she was hot, but what the fuck were those blue bubbles about??!!? Is that what happens when you do meth? Was it Leprosy? I don't know what it was, but it looked really bad. I'm not sure but I think she said something along the lines of, "Excuse me sir. I'm really hungry. Can you help me? I can do things for you." I responded in the typical way I do when fucked up people approach me on the streets by sayin, "I'm sorry, miss." and walked away. If she didn't have those insane blue bubbles on her face, I might have asked her to repeat herself to make it clear as to whether she was looking to exchange sex for something.

You have to be very selective and NEVER do anything that involves a vagina. Only blowjobs.

Yeah, because the mouth is SO much cleaner.  :roll:

You know, they DO make condoms.

I would feel safer having my schlong in a strange mouth than in a strange vag.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: sillyperson on December 30, 2008, 04:09:54 PM
I would feel safer having my schlong in a strange mouth than in a strange vag.
I am deeply, passionately involved with my schlong. I love it and would never stick it in a strange hole that may cause it to shrivel up and fall off.
Call me crazy.
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: fatcat on December 30, 2008, 04:14:09 PM
Seperating the concepts of "love" and "sex" isn't necessarily a bad thing. I think it gives you a deeper understanding on what love actually means to you.

words of wisdom
Title: Re: Would You Ever Pay For A Hooker?
Post by: WallyC33 on December 30, 2008, 09:09:50 PM
I would feel safer having my schlong in a strange mouth than in a strange vag.
I am deeply, passionately involved with my schlong. I love it and would never stick it in a strange hole that may cause it to shrivel up and fall off.
Call me crazy.

Crazy!