I see the confusion... no... I don't think they are equally legitimate. I think Weak Atheism is fictional. I was trying to imply that weak atheism and strong agnosticism are one and the same, but that the REAL label for both is simply strong agnosticism.
As far is any implications about your intelligence... No, I was saying that I didn't think you had actually read or considered any of what I posted, even though you were replying directly to me. It seemed like you just assumed I was defending Rillion's position, and therefore struck a defensive stance of your own, whereas I believed if you had spent some more time on the post you were addressing... (mine) you might have noticed that I was agreeing with you.
So, it had nothing to do with intelligence, but rather, patience.
on the last page of this thread, I addressed the exact same comment you did of Rillion's... saying something very similar to your quote of
"that's retarded" but... while annoyingly making use of a dictionary and giving a long explanation.
We are generally in agreement about the words atheist and agnostic... It will be up to her to defend her irrational position on this.