and not molesting was not an option.It's always an option. It's called suicide.
Earth goes boom.Problem solved.
Nope, the evil alien terrorists have you strapped down. You have to pick one of those kids to rape or Earth goes boom.
Um, "did"? Most of them are older than me, that would not be possible. :lol:
You're one sick fuck.
/also when someone comes by and does put in a vote, either as a serious answer or a joke, you're going to jump around shouting "PERVERT, PERVERT"
thisEarth goes boom.Problem solved.
well, it's definitely a tough choice, but I'd probably chose mark, so he's prepared for prison...
Who the fuck voted for Mark?
Who the fuck voted for Mark?
scroll up just a hair...
Who the fuck voted for Mark?
scroll up just a hair...
But he was a Republican back then...
Mark was nothing as a little kid. He became a commie in high school.
That has nothing to do with molest-ability. First of all, no matter how heterosexual you are, girls that age are simply much harder to molest than boys.
Who do you think is most likely to take twenty bucks and keep his/her mouth shut afterwards? :lol:
Shock threads are a part of this forum's culture, and this is my personal contribution to that time-honored tradition. I was aiming at doing something squimish yet intellectually stimulating that will end in questions like... "Can I buy Julia's permission to photoshop her under-aged face onto an otherwise-legal pornographic photo or drawing?"
Ah, fresh meat!(http://freetalklive.com/images/littledalebert.jpg) (http://wiki.freetalklive.com/Dale_Everett)
:lol:
bullett + head + you |
As in bullettproducts.com (http://www.bullettproducts.com/)? :lol:
Well, this thread is an exercise in free speech. I will trust that The Riddler is not going to kill me, just as I expect others to trust that I would never harm a child (or skin Obama alive and boil him in Tabasco sauce).
No, this thread is an exercise in poor taste. |
When a subject is repeatedly proffered by someone, it is evident that they are captivated by it in some way. It dwells in their thoughts. It is part of their daily ruminations. John, guns. Me, capitalism and wealth building. You, computer geek stuff and pedo. Richard, latent homosexuality. Joy, running, cooking. Brede, logic and AI. The jews, jew stuff. See how it works?
[...] So, no. I don't trust that your interests wouldn't spill over into reality. |
Exactly. So?When a subject is repeatedly proffered by someone, it is evident that they are captivated by it in some way. It dwells in their thoughts. It is part of their daily ruminations. John, guns. Me, capitalism and wealth building. You, computer geek stuff and pedo. Richard, latent homosexuality. Joy, running, cooking. Brede, logic and AI. The jews, jew stuff. See how it works?
Yes, and I've had "legalize kiddy porn" threads on other forums as well, but what fraction of my posts are concerned with that issue? Less than 1%, I am sure. And it is probably the most important issue that the pigs will use to end Internet freedom as we know it! Without Internet freedom nothing else is possible.
Well, you should give me a benefit of doubt, in as much as I don't assume John Shaw is a serial killer just because gun rights are important to him. The fact that I use my real name here is your first hint. Real pedos (or Obama abductors / torturers) don't do that.
Well, this thread is an exercise in free speech. I will trust that The Riddler is not going to kill me, just as I expect others to trust that I would never harm a child (or skin Obama alive and boil him in Tabasco sauce).
Any claim Brasky ever had to libertarianism just went bye-bye.
Well, this thread is an exercise in free speech. I will trust that The Riddler is not going to kill me, just as I expect others to trust that I would never harm a child.
It's just a matter of time before you're marching 'em into the showers, Brasky.... :lol:
That's taking it too far, but many a tyrant included lines like "I am an avid proponent that you cannot legislate morality, BUT ..." in their propaganda.
You went from "harming children" to "child porn" as if they were the same thing. And the people joked about in this thread -- NEWSFLASH -- are no longer children. And they're not being harmed in any conceivable way - I didn't even copy the photos embedded above, just linked to the ones on the About page of the main site (http://freetalklive.com/about.php).
The purpose of this thread was to fish out any unlibertarian prejudices on this forum, and it has been a smashing success.
Obama. Either Bush. Either Clinton. And so on.
Any politician really. "Legislating morality" sounds bad, so they don't support it outright. But they do it anyway.
You're repeating yourself. And every "compassionate conservative" that came before you. Go sprout your jihad somewhere else.
Thus, only a complete lack of restriction in every imaginable form is acceptable to you. |
Ever hear of the non-aggression principle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle)? Parents' rights (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parents%27_rights_movement)? Suing for child emancipation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emancipation_of_minors)? Freedom of speech (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech)? Freedom of contract (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_contract) (through which one could grant the permission to use the likeness of oneself as a child)?
Admit it, you're into FTL just for the lulz, you haven't learned a thing. It is people like you who would stand by and do nothing as Internet freedoms are taken away, if only the freedoms you personally care about were not affected. You disgust me!
This thread has been a test, and you have failed big time.
Anyone can call anyone else a pedophile. You can't prove a negative. But you have no reason to believe that I'm a pedophile except for my interest in free speech and Internet freedom, both of which are being diminished by the prohibition of child porn.
And I could think whoever supports gun rights is a serial killer.
But the key difference between us is - I'm not stupid.
... because ...
Anyone can call anyone else a pedophile. You can't prove a negative. But you have no reason to believe that I'm a pedophile except for my interest in free speech and Internet freedom, both of which are being diminished by the prohibition of child porn.
or I can think you're a pedophile because you made a topic called "If you were a pedophile . . ." and then posted lots of pics of young kids asking which one would we molest
Huh? What does this thread have to do with "fucking little kids"? That's awful! :?
If you were a pedophile...
Quote If you were a pedophile, which of those kids would you molest first? |
The question is:
And we all know it is impossible for a pedophile to molest the kids on those photographs because they are no longer kids.
Well, if you molest anybody and I find out about it, there will be hell to pay.
(Of course it should be up to the victim and/or her parents to decide if she has been "molested" or not.)
But any "speech" (including copying of photographs, video, etc) of you doing that, even if it indeed was a crime, should not be illegal. No quantity or possible combination of 1's and 0's should ever be a crime!
Ways of getting child pornography without molesting a child:
- (1) Children posting images of themselves with no adults involved, like I did when I was ~15.
- (2) Drawing / 3D modeling / photoshopping images.
- (3) Emancipated minors (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emancipation_of_minors) who can be as young as you care to imagine - emancipation from one's parents / guardians should be based on one's mental faculties and abilities, not accidents of chronology.
- (4) Adults who look much younger than they really are, which could become more prevalent in the future (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=28489.0).
- (5) Children getting permission from their parents - this one is controversial, I know.
- (6) Kids who grow up / get emancipated from their parents and grant pardon to their "molester" (who was presumably prosecuted by their parents against the "victim's" wishes), thereby declaring that what happened was not a crime.
(There likely are other scenarios that I'm failing to think of.)
Opposing mass hysteria over victimless crimes that could lead to ever more Internet censorship is "sickness"... Sure...
Do you even make the tiniest effort to think rationally about this, or is your mind hopelessly stuck in a "bash whoever is not bashing pedophiles hard enough" loop? Snap out of it! Without freedom of information all other freedoms are meaningless! And, like all prohibitions, it can be used to silence any political dissent - you may have "kiddy porn" on your computer right now and not even know it until you're in a prison cell!
you couldn't have picked a worse battle position if you tried.
I've expressed many opinions on this BBS. I was wrong a number of times, and I have admitted it when proven wrong. This thread, on the other hand, remains - a triumph, in my mind, of philosophical satire against irrational emotion and peer pressure. You have failed to make any points against free speech here, all you've done is make insults and threaten to initiate violence. You fail.
Ways of getting child pornography without molesting a child:
- (1) Children posting images of themselves with no adults involved, like I did when I was ~15.
- (2) Drawing / 3D modeling / photoshopping images.
- (3) Emancipated minors (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emancipation_of_minors) who can be as young as you care to imagine - emancipation from one's parents / guardians should be based on one's mental faculties and abilities, not accidents of chronology.
- (4) Adults who look much younger than they really are, which could become more prevalent in the future (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=28489.0).
- (5) Children getting permission from their parents - this one is controversial, I know.
- (6) Kids who grow up / get emancipated from their parents and grant pardon to their "molester" (who was presumably prosecuted by their parents against the "victim's" wishes), thereby declaring that what happened was not a crime.
(There likely are other scenarios that I'm failing to think of.)
(2) Drawing / 3D modeling / photoshopping images.
Bart, Lisa and Maggie Simpson are at the center of a legal case in Australia that ponders a bizarre — and slightly creepy — question: Are drawings that depict the younger members of the Simpsons clan engaged in carnal activities merely offensive and crude? or do they actually constitute child pornography?-- http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/08/bart-simpson-child-pornography-and-free-speech/ (http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/08/bart-simpson-child-pornography-and-free-speech/)
Yesterday, an Australian judge ruled that such images are indeed illegal. The decision upholds the conviction of a man who was found guilty in February of possessing child pornography, after the offending cartoons (which were piracies and not official Simpsons ware) were discovered on his computer. It is not clear how or why the man was arrested, or whether his arrest was part of a larger sting operation.
There is something definately wrong with you for even thinking of this crap.
Everyone should keep their kids away from you at all costs. There is nothing funny about molesting children. You are a sick man. Get some help before you get raped in prison.
Now if I had a daughter and some guy molested her I would take care of it the "old-fashioned" way (figure it out yourself...)
Now if I had a daughter and some guy molested her I would take care of it the "old-fashioned" way (figure it out yourself...)
One can be a victim of molestation and go on to live healthy normal lives. It's not the end of the world.
Thanks, Gene.
And any parent / guardian whose child was molested obviously does have the right to seek justice.
This thread is about ridiculing thought-crime and nothing else.
If you're not attracted to 16 year old girls and you're attracted to women, there's something wrong with you.
If you're not attracted to 16 year old girls and you're attracted to women, there's something wrong with you.
If you're not attracted to 16 year old girls and you're attracted to women, there's something wrong with you.
I find 16 year old boys repulsive in every way, yet I'm attracted to men. Guess there must be something wrong with me.
Which is why the ball gag was invented.QuoteIf you're not attracted to 16 year old girls and you're attracted to women, there's something wrong with you.
The physical yea there are definitely some girls I've seen who look gorgeous. Their personality though would kill the mood.
If you're not attracted to 16 year old girls and you're attracted to women, there's something wrong with you.
I find 16 year old boys repulsive in every way, yet I'm attracted to men. Guess there must be something wrong with me.
because high school <B>girls</B> stay the same age while you keep on getting older
Now if I had a daughter and some guy molested her I would take care of it the "old-fashioned" way (figure it out yourself...)
One can be a victim of molestation and go on to live healthy normal lives. It's not the end of the world.
Now if I had a daughter and some guy molested her I would take care of it the "old-fashioned" way (figure it out yourself...)
One can be a victim of molestation and go on to live healthy normal lives. It's not the end of the world.
yeah, but it takes years of therapy and love.
I love Julia, I would love to hear her on the show two or three nights a week. She really makes FTL a better show when she's on, the show takes on a complete more complex character with her.
I have never met her and I understand that she is a bit camera shy. She looks really young in all the pictures that I've seen. It's judging someone by their looks, but she seems responsible and intelegent and I enjoy her participation on the show. She just looks like my sister when she was fourteen. It just is, I don't mean that as a insult.
I couldn't molest any child because I don't feel sexual about any of them. Julia looks like that to me in her pictures. I really love her on the show and I'm sure I'd like her, she just looks so young. I wonder if anyone else has thought of that or if she just doesn't photograph well... or there's lots of old picture up there of her.
Anyway... A follow up to the question should be how do you want to molest the person you chose.
I hate pictures. The ones you've seen are at least three years old though. I look young, but not 14. Here's a more recent one:
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b129/Hoppapotamus/DSCF02701.jpg)
Thanks for the compliments though!
I hate pictures. The ones you've seen are at least three years old though. I look young, but not 14. Here's a more recent one:
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b129/Hoppapotamus/DSCF02701.jpg)
Thanks for the compliments though!
You're a cat? WTF?
Yes. I am a big fat fluffy orange cat.
MOW.
If you're not attracted to 16 year old girls and you're attracted to women, there's something wrong with you.
I find 16 year old boys repulsive in every way, yet I'm attracted to men. Guess there must be something wrong with me.