If you were a pedophile...

Little Ian -

2 (5.7%)

Little Mark -

2 (5.7%)

Little Julia -

18 (51.4%)

Little Nick -

6 (17.1%)

Little Wayne -

0 (0%)

Little Torgo -

0 (0%)

Little Melissa -

2 (5.7%)

Little Johnson -

3 (8.6%)

Little Jason -

2 (5.7%)

Total Members Voted: 16

[Bill Brasky]

Any claim Brasky ever had to libertarianism just went bye-bye.

How long have you been here?

I had 11,000 posts in my first incarnation, 3,000 in my second, and probably 1000 or more posts now.

I've always maintained a minarchist perspective.  I've never once claimed to be a libertarian.  I don't believe in DRO's.  I don't believe in market-based ostracism as a solution.  I don't agree with profiteering on certain things, and I approve of the use of force when necessary or appropriate - one of which is preventing harm to those who cannot protect themselves.  Naturally, in this sense, the harm may already be done, but future harm can be prevented by removing the perpetrators of proven acts, and identifying pattern behavior is evident. 

[sillyperson]

It's just a matter of time before you're marching 'em into the showers, Brasky.... 

[Alex Libman]

That's taking it too far, but many a tyrant included lines like "I am an avid proponent that you cannot legislate morality, BUT ..." in their propaganda.

[davann]

Well, this thread is an exercise in free speech.  I will trust that The Riddler is not going to kill me, just as I expect others to trust that I would never harm a child.

Not sure why you would expect others to trust you have not or will not harm children. If I ever met you and there were children around I would knock you unconscious just to be safe.

BTW, have you removed all that child porn from your PC you collected as a teenager? I only ask to hopefully get the feds, if they actually do troll here, pointed in your direction.

[Alex Libman]

You went from "harming children" to "child porn" as if they were the same thing.  And the people joked about in this thread -- NEWSFLASH -- are no longer children.  And they're not being harmed in any conceivable way - I didn't even copy the photos embedded above, just linked to the ones on the About page of the main site.

The purpose of this thread was to fish out any unlibertarian prejudices on this forum, and it has been a smashing success.

[Bill Brasky]

It's just a matter of time before you're marching 'em into the showers, Brasky.... 

Yeah.  They can't build the chambers fast enough for me.  Maybe sports arenas. 

[Bill Brasky]

That's taking it too far, but many a tyrant included lines like "I am an avid proponent that you cannot legislate morality, BUT ..." in their propaganda.

Really?   Name one. 

[Alex Libman]

Obama.  Either Bush.  Either Clinton.  And so on.

Any politician really.  "Legislating morality" sounds bad, so they don't support it outright.  But they do it anyway.

[Bill Brasky]

You went from "harming children" to "child porn" as if they were the same thing.  And the people joked about in this thread -- NEWSFLASH -- are no longer children.  And they're not being harmed in any conceivable way - I didn't even copy the photos embedded above, just linked to the ones on the About page of the main site.

The purpose of this thread was to fish out any unlibertarian prejudices on this forum, and it has been a smashing success.

No, the purpose of this thread is simply another one of Libmans famous "Look how crazy I am" pieces of shit.  You're ego-surfing, and wiping a dual-purpose dirty sanchez under the nose of both your vile perversion in broad daylight, where it is most unacceptable - thus most enjoyable to discuss, amid the molestation and corruption of the childhood personnas of the now-adult figures who own this place, which you've quit countless times because nobody recognizes your 'brilliance'.  

A mans philosophy is his core.  There are several that are within the bounds of reason, there is more than one right way.  Whether you are Libertarian or Anarchist or Objectivist or Minarchist is moot, because any of those positions can be held by moral or immoral people.  Like fire, it is a tool that is neither good nor bad inherently, but what you do with it, and why you utilize its power is what makes it wrong or right in its implementation.  It seems to me that you embrace the philosophy for the purposes of doing whatever strokes your sick fuckin' triggers, rather than having the right purpose in your soul and seeking the philosophy that promotes it.  Its a corruption of the concept of immunity, an exploitation.  The reason for freedom and liberty is to promote growth and positive benefits of the human condition, not to promote the filth as an example to entice reform.  The scum is an unfortunate side effect that may be tolerated, not the reason in and of itself.  You fucking idiot.  

[Alex Libman]

You're repeating yourself.  And every "compassionate conservative" that came before you.  Go sprout your jihad somewhere else.

[Bill Brasky]

Obama.  Either Bush.  Either Clinton.  And so on.

Any politician really.  "Legislating morality" sounds bad, so they don't support it outright.  But they do it anyway.

No kidding they do it anyway.  You're arguing from the opposite side of 'no fucking duh'.  Any legislation is a condemnation of behavior of one kind or another.  Its a restriction of *something*.  Thus, only a complete lack of restriction in every imaginable form is acceptable to you.  Which is pure anarchy.  So, you are incapable of being a Libertarian because you reject the foundation necessary to implement it.  

Which makes me wonder why I'm painted with the brush you don't give a fuck about.  

[Bill Brasky]

You're repeating yourself.  And every "compassionate conservative" that came before you.  Go sprout your jihad somewhere else.

I'm repeating myself?  In yet another one of your Pedo threads? 

I'm pretty sure one of us is repeating.  And one of us is sprouting something. 

[Alex Libman]

Thus, only a complete lack of restriction in every imaginable form is acceptable to you.

Ever hear of the non-aggression principle?  Parents' rights?  Suing for child emancipation?  Freedom of speech?  Freedom of contract (through which one could grant the permission to use the likeness of oneself as a child)?

Admit it, you're into FTL just for the lulz, you haven't learned a thing.  It is people like you who would stand by and do nothing as Internet freedoms are taken away, if only the freedoms you personally care about were not affected.  You disgust me!

[TimeLady Victorious]

libman topic

[Bill Brasky]

Thus, only a complete lack of restriction in every imaginable form is acceptable to you.

Ever hear of the non-aggression principle?  Parents' rights?  Suing for child emancipation?  Freedom of speech?  Freedom of contract (through which one could grant the permission to use the likeness of oneself as a child)?

Admit it, you're into FTL just for the lulz, you haven't learned a thing.  It is people like you who would stand by and do nothing as Internet freedoms are taken away, if only the freedoms you personally care about were not affected.  You disgust me!

Yeah, I've heard of all of those things.  Half of those cancel out the other half, Johnny Cockring.  Nebulous litigation is the bane of logic, and you propose to make the courts the playground of the monied elite, tipped in favor of those who can sustain a prolonged court appearance.  

More fantasy fluff from Lipertopians who seek to mystify.  Bailiff, bring forth the docket, lets schedule Mr. Libman for the Fifth of Never, as he has clearly demonstrated a technical loophole we, the corrupt yet toothless courts, shall hear his brilliant arguments and swoon to the tune of his jibberjabber.  I propose a change of venue, to the Courts of Neverland, where Judge Jackson will rule with impartial benevolence.  

Throw out the evidence, it is digital, and can be altered, and was gathered in foreign countries where the actions are legal.  Throw out the testimony, as the drugs rendered temporary insanity.  Emancipate the victim, so the defendant can marry him in a gay ceremony and then strike the whole thing as a crime of passion, a lovers spat that cannot be considered criminal.  Send it to civil court, where the defendant can sue the former family for damages incurred in his defense.  

All that chicanery is much better than cutting through the crap with clear eyes.  How wrong of me to find that 1+1 does not equal two, but can be argued infinitum into a land of senselessness.  

The word you seek, Alex, is 'boondoggle'.