FSP opinions.

The FSP is our best shot. I have moved or am planning to move at some point.

28 (53.8%)

The FSP is important, but I am not interested in joining/moving to new hampshire any time soon.

8 (15.4%)

The FSP is an okay idea but I don't think it will work and I have no intention of joining or funding it.

4 (7.7%)

The FSP will fail. It's a waste of time/diversion.

6 (11.5%)

Other

6 (11.5%)

Total Members Voted: 30

[Bill Brasky]

Keene only has a population of 22,000 and thats the 2nd biggest city in new hampshire if im not mistaken.

Maybe you should look into things more before you talk about them.

You are mistaken. 

I love how that line is followed by the other. 

[BKO]

Goddard, by "fighting force" I mean a well armed and prepared militia. I mean utilizing the application of force against tyranny.

And I am not building an army, I merely suggested this rational, yet radical logical solution for the current problem.

[DogOn]

Keene only has a population of 22,000 and thats the 2nd biggest city in new hampshire if im not mistaken.

Maybe you should look into things more before you talk about them.

You are mistaken. 

I love how that line is followed by the other. 

The rank of Keene among size of new Hampshire cities is pretty irrelevant trivia. After a quick Google and wikipedia search didn't make it clear what rank, i couldn't be bothered spending any more time on the question.

However, how many people are members of the free state project and what the goal of the free state project is actually quite relevant to this issue of whether the FSP is a good idea or not.

Point remains, Keene is one of the largest "cities" in New Hampshire, and the fact I didn't know its exact rank doesn't take away from the point I was making. However saying the the FSP is going to fail because it only plans on moving a few thousand people is blatantly false.

[sillyperson]

Goddard, by "fighting force" I mean a well armed and prepared militia.

Are you doing fuck-all about it, then? Maybe... supporting the reinstatement of a people's militia?
http://generalcourt.org/bills/2008/hb1431

AN ACT establishing a permanent state defense force.

...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NewHampshireStateGuardStudyGroup

The membership of the New Hampshire State Guard pledges to serve and defend the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire as well as the Constitution for these United States of America against all enemies whether they are foreign or domestic.

Or, does your idea of "activism" consist of hitting the refresh button on pornotube.com ?

[SamR]

Manchester - 109,000
Nashua - 88,000
Concord - 40,000
Rochester - 29,000
Keene - 22,000
Portsmouth - 21,000

Obviously, Deerfield (4,000), Grafton (2,000), and Seabrook (7,000) are going to get there first as free town projects. There are lots of people in Manchester, but that's a big city.  The others listed have large liberal voting bases (except Rochester). Keene and Portsmouth are nice cities, but I don't think that they'll ever see proliberty majorities. Porcs have to keep their heads down, there.

[BKO]

Whoa, ease up Goddard.

What I choose to do is none of your concern. What is being discussed is my proposal, the idea. You don't have to resort to personal attacks. I am sorry that I can't be there to support your defunct Free State Project, but you don't have to resort to personal attacks just because I refuse to join the NH National Guard wannabe club.

I'm currently in Europe, and I already have a contract with my federal employers. And that is all I will say about that.

[sillyperson]

What is being discussed is my proposal, the idea.

... of masturbating non-stop until you find Freedom?

[jimmed]

What is being discussed is my proposal, the idea.

... of masturbating non-stop until you find Freedom?

How...professional.

[BKO]

Hehe.

I just don't see any point in discussing the futile attempt of trying to change the system by voting and picketing. Sure, you can vote for the privilege of raising a militia, but it is counterproductive and doesn't make any sense. What I proposed to discuss is the actual action required to overthrow tyranny, not semantics and blind faith in democracy.

If you want true freedom in this lifetime, or any other for that matter -you must be willing to spill some blood. Freedoms are sufferable, you cannot expect others to get out of your way simply because you claim to have moral superiority or just cause, without backing your proposal with the intention of force. Dictatorships and mobs do not part way for fanciful slogans and peaceful picketing. End of story.

[rabidfurby]

You don't have to resort to personal attacks.

Are you fucking serious?

dead-end hippie camp out in the frozen tundra of New Hampshire.

Talk about wolves gone rabid, you timid shits will probably eat your own young if it served your useless cause.

You catch ONE little mistake, which can arguably be considered to be a strategic ploy, and you swordfucked pieholes jump around like ghetto trash gone wild after the Rodney King verdict.

I agree that Shaw has an excellent point (I rarely agree with that windbag, but hey, Shaw does have a valid point)

I won't bitch and moan if a few of you cocksuckers talk shit and label me as a fruit tampon.

It's actually entertaining to return periodically and find the same idiotic topics posted by what must be completely insane pencil nibbling asswarts.

[SamR]

+1, man. +1

[Porcupine_in_MA]

The man wielding a kitten strikes again. 

[BKO]

How is any of that the same, Furby? A personal, childish attack against me gets compared to my several posts which include DIRECT RESPONSES (you just copied the swear words) to the topic being discussed. The ONLY direct "attack" was to Shaw -and even he can agree right here in this thread that it was all in good humor. Look at his response -returned in kind.

You see, FURBY -I simply don't resort to personally attacking the individual while ignoring the topic of discussion or directed question. You can continue to support EVERY PERSON who starts an argument with me if you want to -fuck, I don't expect to change your mind...but, you should know that until you actually PROVE ME WRONG, thus proving YOUR IDEOLOGY correct -and this requires directly answering the question -then you should know that only children will ever support your ridiculous antics.

Goddard avoided the subject because REALITY was too much for him. Furby and Goddard -the two of you make an outstanding team, and you serve the FSP perfectly in my opinion. And so, you research for what must have been quite a while, copy every swear word and phrase which catches your eye, and then use all of that as an attempt to justify the actions of Goddard, who DIRECTLY AVOIDED the topic in a childish manner and instead -INSTEAD, chose to resort to personal attacks and insults.

I always use language, Furby. Pretty muyh every post I make has some kind of SHOCKING revelation. The ONLY PERSONALLY directed language in all the misquoted excerpt you posted that is PERSONAL is to Shaw -and delivered while being completely involved with the DISCUSSION.

Rabidfurby...I now remember why you were on ignore. You are going back to ignore, and it is simply because  I have just wasted all the time I intend on your ridiculous ploys. Really, I mean -look at the ROACHES that came out of the woodwork after your idiotic post. Yeah, that was another use of my language, and I do believe that it is far more accurate than blindly accusing others of being "MaSturBaTerZ" while avoiding the discussion altogether.

[SamR]

Hey Brokor's one cool dude. We should cut him some slack. I'm just +1ing the idea that the S2N ratio here gets pretty bad. I try to ignore the negative stuff and stick with the positive. The feds are probably reading these posts and laughing at us.

[John Shaw]

Why do I always get dragged into this stuff? I haven't even posted to this thread.