Welcome to the Free Talk Live bulletin board system!
This board is closed to new users and new posts.  Thank you to all our great mods and users over the years.  Details here.
185859 Posts in 9829 Topics by 1371 Members
Latest Member: cjt26
Home Help
+  The Free Talk Live BBS
|-+  Free Talk Live
| |-+  The Polling Pit
| | |-+  Bikers suck!

Poll

If you could be a hardcore high-budget vagabond ...

1 wheel
- 5 (15.2%)
2 wheels
- 7 (21.2%)
3 wheels
- 2 (6.1%)
4 wheels
- 7 (21.2%)
5 wheels
- 1 (3%)
6 wheels
- 1 (3%)
8 wheels
- 0 (0%)
10 wheels
- 1 (3%)
12 wheels
- 0 (0%)
14 wheels
- 0 (0%)
16 wheels
- 0 (0%)
18 wheels
- 1 (3%)
20 wheels
- 0 (0%)
22 wheels
- 1 (3%)
More  (road train)
- 7 (21.2%)

Total Members Voted: 19


Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Down

Author Topic: Bikers suck!  (Read 25595 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

DontTreadOnMike

  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 507
    • View Profile
    • DontTreadOnMike Blog
Re: Bikers suck!
« Reply #15 on: October 26, 2008, 01:00:55 AM »

And splitting lanes at highway speeds gets you pulled over faster than just about anything else. 


Splitting lanes is legal in California.
Logged

AntonLee

  • Guest
Re: Bikers suck!
« Reply #16 on: October 26, 2008, 01:31:13 AM »

Check out the FX show Sons of Anarchy.

You get better anarchy with a Dodge Challenger.

Good luck hiding your assault weapons and gold in a motorcycle...  ;)


... and a change of clothes (or several, unless you like skin sores or stopping to do laundry every few days)

... and a sleeping bag in case you can't find a motel

... and something you can send e-mail with, without getting Repetitive Strain Injury

... and some water, food, and med kit, as well as a repair kit if you break down in the middle of nowhere

... and a passenger seat in case you meet someone special

... and some sex toys if she's into that sorta thing

... and a back seat


52 MPG

Yes, and you save even more money by walking.  And that MPG estimate is for people who travel light - I bet a hybrid car gets lower MPG than a bike above certain load weight.


haf the commute time due to splitting lanes

I'd like to check your math on how you end up with "haf".  And splitting lanes at highway speeds gets you pulled over faster than just about anything else.  And in bumper-to-bumper traffic, you know some jerk in an F-150 is gonna open a door in front of you someday - how often does one get an opportunity to get away with attempted murder?


It's impressive because it's so dangerous.

It doesn't require any more balance and skill than to do the same thing with a pedal-powered bike, just more stupidity.  And you can mount a pedal-powered bike on your car and take it places.


Oh, and biking through New Hampshire in winter sounds like particularly bright idea...  :lol:


I actually agree with you Libman.  I was watching this show Sons of Anarchy, and it's led me down a wonderful trail of wikipedia and other online data about motorcycles, mc's, and the mystical patches and the like.  It led me to a board where there was this guy spouting off about how if he sees someone wearing a vest or jacket with a patch on the back and it doesn't have MC he'd rip it off and burn the guys' jacket right in front of him.  Another guy spouted in saying he should burn the other guy's back.

I never have rode for a long distance, I've never owned my own bike.  I've always thought that a car was a more sensible means if you wanted to be a cross country guy.  Hell, even that movie Easy Rider the actors say in the special features that just the short rides were killing their asses and backs, not to mention holding your arms up.  Fonda, a professional rider was "worn out"  And they weren't even really crossing the country they were taking small samples.

Give me a fast car, a durable car with ram bars in the front, reinforced bumpers and side skirts. . . something not huge perhaps something like a Dodge Charger or Challenger or even a Magnum would do the trick.  When that biker gang comes along, you just roll on through. . . literally. 

I also imagine something like Vin Diesel's GTO in XXX. . . rockets and guns attached to it, popping out when needed.  While I'm thinking of all this, definitely a Mercedes Benz would be rather nice too, and if you get the old ass diesel or not "limo" versions you'd have plenty of room to sleep as well.  You would attract a bit more attention. 

what you need is Easy Rider's weed mixed with two parts Mad Max and Return to Thunderdome.

stir until a boil. . . now beat. . . .well
Logged

Alex Libman

  • Guest
Re: Bikers suck!
« Reply #17 on: October 26, 2008, 02:16:44 AM »

I just thought of a big one: there ain't no such thing as a bullet-proof motorcycle!  (Well, at least not to any benefit of the rider.)  In a vehicular gunfight, the biker doesn't stand a chance!


Splitting lanes is legal in California.

Give `em time.  And that's not really a benefit in other states.  And this site says "lane splitting by motorcycles is permissible but must be done in a safe and prudent manner"; this site calls it a "legal grey area" - a cop can use that as an excuse to pull you over if s\he wants to.

And unless you're stuck in urban rush-hour traffic, there's little benefit to lane splitting without hitting some major passing speeds.  And you are counting on your ability to accurately estimate your bike's acceleration, otherwise you've just cut some guy off and you're going slower than him.  On a long-enough time-line, the life expectancy of a high-speed lane-splitter reaches that of roadkill.  Especially down south, where some good 'ol boys don't like it.

And - like defenders of European socialism, you're trying to have your cake and eat it too.  You can't attach a zillion bags to a motorcycle when arguing cargo capacity AND use unloaded weight when talking about acceleration.  With motorcycles, you get one or the other.  With cars you get both.


I actually agree with you Libman.

Wow, thanks.


Hell, even that movie Easy Rider the actors say in the special features that just the short rides were killing their asses and backs, not to mention holding your arms up.  Fonda, a professional rider was "worn out"  And they weren't even really crossing the country they were taking small samples.

:lol:
Logged

Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith)

  • A Cut Above The Rest
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8299
  • If government is the answer, the question is stupi
    • View Profile
Re: Bikers suck!
« Reply #18 on: October 26, 2008, 06:24:54 AM »

Well I have two wheels and I love them.
Logged
"Do not throw rocks at people with guns." —Hastings' Third Law
"Income tax returns are the most imaginative fiction being written today." —Herman Wouk 

"If you want total security, go to prison. There you're fed, clothed, given medical care and so on. The only thing lacking... is freedom." - Dwight D. Eisenhower

Taors

  • Guest
Re: Bikers suck!
« Reply #19 on: October 26, 2008, 09:57:38 AM »



What happens to bikers in my world.
Logged

DontTreadOnMike

  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 507
    • View Profile
    • DontTreadOnMike Blog
Re: Bikers suck!
« Reply #20 on: October 26, 2008, 12:31:03 PM »

Wow you're spending a lot of time trolling around here. Don't you have something you could be doing in the real world?
Logged

BonerJoe

  • Guest
Re: Bikers suck!
« Reply #21 on: October 26, 2008, 12:35:32 PM »

Wow you're spending a lot of time trolling around here. Don't you have something you could be doing in the real world?

Ya, like holding signs.
Logged

Taors

  • Guest
Re: Bikers suck!
« Reply #22 on: October 26, 2008, 12:38:27 PM »

Wow you're spending a lot of time trolling around here. Don't you have something you could be doing in the real world?

Who is this guy?
Logged

DontTreadOnMike

  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 507
    • View Profile
    • DontTreadOnMike Blog
Re: Bikers suck!
« Reply #23 on: October 26, 2008, 12:43:48 PM »

Mike. Who are you?
Logged

Taors

  • Guest
Re: Bikers suck!
« Reply #24 on: October 26, 2008, 12:52:44 PM »

Mike. Who are you?



How many god damn signs do you want me to hold?
Logged

DontTreadOnMike

  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 507
    • View Profile
    • DontTreadOnMike Blog
Re: Bikers suck!
« Reply #25 on: October 26, 2008, 12:55:24 PM »

I dont get the joke. I'm new around here.
Logged

BonerJoe

  • Guest
Re: Bikers suck!
« Reply #26 on: October 26, 2008, 01:03:03 PM »

That guy in the green shirt really gets my boner going.
Logged

Alex Libman

  • Guest
Re: Bikers suck!
« Reply #27 on: October 29, 2008, 03:01:03 AM »

Um, that prohibitionist parody would do well on a thread started by someone who doesn't have a fairly lengthy history of opposing prohibition - every issue, every time.

And I've never expressed any dislike for interacting with people who choose to be bikers, just discouraged the prospect of becoming one, and the idea that a motorcycle is practical transportation for an anarchist vagabond, which came up in AMP chat one night...

Logged

AntonLee

  • Guest
Re: Bikers suck!
« Reply #28 on: October 29, 2008, 05:44:50 AM »

I've just made a personal choice, Car over Motorcycle.  I'm not advocating removing motorcycles from the road.
Logged

Alex Libman

  • Guest
Re: Bikers suck!
« Reply #29 on: October 29, 2008, 07:44:02 AM »

No one is advocating removing anything.

We can still snicker behind bikers' backs though...  8)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Up
+  The Free Talk Live BBS
|-+  Free Talk Live
| |-+  The Polling Pit
| | |-+  Bikers suck!

// ]]>

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 36 queries.