You mean like Fark?
That's just a link deposit ain't it?
I'm talking about authorship here. People writing above the level of forum fodder. Throw out the bullshit, keep the good, see what people do with it.
I wasn't talking about the content, I was talking about the format.
Plus, why go through all that when they can just post what they want, when they want right here?
The format of the BBS discussion seems to work against interest and towards dipshittery.
Look at a forum like
http://www.totse.com/. The posting in the forum is roughly 1000% more retarded than what manages to end up as a submitted article. Now admittedly totse is a play ground for unbalanced tweenies and wannabe-pyromaniacs, but it doesn't mean the same format might not produce some interesting results.
When people are presented with the format of submitting a narrative, instructional, diatribe etc, they often come up with much more interesting content because they're putting thought into making a self sealed package of interest, insight and funneh. On this forum 50%+ is just bitching and grudges between various members, I'm interested to hear what people might write about if they weren't writing with expectation of a response.
Theres a fair few here with podcasts and blogs and the like, so its not uncommon for people here to have something they want to put out independent from idle banter and bullshit. I don't see how it would lower the quality of any other part of the site, and it could just be put up as an experiment for a couple of weeks.