Age of Consent

19 or older.

0 (0%)

18

3 (5.8%)

17

1 (1.9%)

16

15 (28.8%)

15

5 (9.6%)

14

8 (15.4%)

13

7 (13.5%)

12

5 (9.6%)

11 or younger.

8 (15.4%)

Total Members Voted: 18

[Charles]

I think I'd want the age of consent to be the same as the age you hit adulthood, but I don't think it should always be punishable if the age of consent is broken.  The legal precedent would have to be that as long as there is no victim in the sex act it is not punishable.  Hence, a fourteen year old girl would probably be a victim if she's having sex with a 40 something year old guy whether she knows it or not.  A court would be a lot better to ascertain if she really is a victim.

[Richard_III]

I think I'd want the age of consent to be the same as the age you hit adulthood, but I don't think it should always be punishable if the age of consent is broken.  The legal precedent would have to be that as long as there is no victim in the sex act it is not punishable.  Hence, a fourteen year old girl would probably be a victim if she's having sex with a 40 something year old guy whether she knows it or not.  A court would be a lot better to ascertain if she really is a victim.

The reality is that most pedophiles are mostly cowards and they will not go after these young teenagers unless these young people are already  part of the underground sex scene. A larger portion of pedophiles will prey on young children who lack the ability to use logic.

These AOC laws are understood to be there in order to to protect young people from "adults". The problem is that the majority of sexual abuse is being done by young boys. This abuse is going on in the elementary school and primarily, high school level. The high school girls eventually come to realize that they have been abused, yet they never bother to report it, because our sex-crazed culture promotes a delusional notion that young people are "maturing" and "learning" about sex.

This is a huge disgrace, and few are willing to accept that our young sons are really vile monsters. These boys do not reason and they do not care. If we do not put a stop to it, then we will have to keep listening to the whores, justify their broken behavior.

But the "whores" do not want to be called "whores", Ya see. Because it hurts their feelings and brings deep shame. The "whores" want to be called "sexually liberated", because our secular culture allows for such perverted understanding.

[Taors]

I think I'd want the age of consent to be the same as the age you hit adulthood, but I don't think it should always be punishable if the age of consent is broken.  The legal precedent would have to be that as long as there is no victim in the sex act it is not punishable.  Hence, a fourteen year old girl would probably be a victim if she's having sex with a 40 something year old guy whether she knows it or not.  A court would be a lot better to ascertain if she really is a victim.

Determine adulthood without arbitrary means and I'll agree.

[Lindsey]

I think I'd want the age of consent to be the same as the age you hit adulthood, but I don't think it should always be punishable if the age of consent is broken.  The legal precedent would have to be that as long as there is no victim in the sex act it is not punishable.  Hence, a fourteen year old girl would probably be a victim if she's having sex with a 40 something year old guy whether she knows it or not.  A court would be a lot better to ascertain if she really is a victim.

The reality is that most pedophiles are mostly cowards and they will not go after these young teenagers...

I cut out the rest of that in my quoting process because I wanted to agree.  But there's a catch.  You're right, a pedophile won't go after a teenager.  A pedophile does not have an attraction to teenagers.  Pedophiles have an attraction to young children. 

[Richard_III]

I think I'd want the age of consent to be the same as the age you hit adulthood, but I don't think it should always be punishable if the age of consent is broken.  The legal precedent would have to be that as long as there is no victim in the sex act it is not punishable.  Hence, a fourteen year old girl would probably be a victim if she's having sex with a 40 something year old guy whether she knows it or not.  A court would be a lot better to ascertain if she really is a victim.

The reality is that most pedophiles are mostly cowards and they will not go after these young teenagers...

I cut out the rest of that in my quoting process because I wanted to agree.  But there's a catch.  You're right, a pedophile won't go after a teenager.  A pedophile does not have an attraction to teenagers.  Pedophiles have an attraction to young children. 

Are you a lawyer or something?

Yer right with the official definition, but "pedophile" is genreally used for those interested in underage people. I can't remember the correct name for the lolita chasers, but yer right, in a way.

[Bill Brasky]

Maybe the AOC should be removed and a formula applied in its place.  +/- 2 yrs up 'til 16, +/- 4 yrs from 16 to 18, then anything goes after that.  Keep the youths from getting into problems with arbitrary lines, keep the pervs from nailing the teenyboppers.  Something like that. 


I donno, just a thought. 

[Taors]

But what about the law?

[Lindsey]

I think I'd want the age of consent to be the same as the age you hit adulthood, but I don't think it should always be punishable if the age of consent is broken.  The legal precedent would have to be that as long as there is no victim in the sex act it is not punishable.  Hence, a fourteen year old girl would probably be a victim if she's having sex with a 40 something year old guy whether she knows it or not.  A court would be a lot better to ascertain if she really is a victim.

The reality is that most pedophiles are mostly cowards and they will not go after these young teenagers...

I cut out the rest of that in my quoting process because I wanted to agree.  But there's a catch.  You're right, a pedophile won't go after a teenager.  A pedophile does not have an attraction to teenagers.  Pedophiles have an attraction to young children. 

Are you a lawyer or something?

Yer right with the official definition, but "pedophile" is genreally used for those interested in underage people. I can't remember the correct name for the lolita chasers, but yer right, in a way.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia

And no, I'm not a lawyer.  My father always said I should be one though. 

[Taors]

That picture of the Greek kid kissing the man is pretty fucking gay.

[Bill Brasky]

But what about the law?

That would be the law. 

If people who made laws made that the law. 



Gimme that fuckin phone.  ring ring, Hey.

Murmer, murmer murmer. 

Okay, g'bye.




Okay, we're good.  What next?

[Richard_III]

Maybe the AOC should be removed and a formula applied in its place.  +/- 2 yrs up 'til 16, +/- 4 yrs from 16 to 18, then anything goes after that.  Keep the youths from getting into problems with arbitrary lines, keep the pervs from nailing the teenyboppers.  Something like that. 


I donno, just a thought. 

Why couldn't people just take it to court if they have an issue with it?

If 'Motherfucker' (A) screws 'Whiny Bitch' (B), both aged 14, if B decides she's been had, let her take it to court, cover the cost of the trail and hope someone agrees with the stupid wench.

Rape is rape, I don't think you need a complex system based around ages to define the matter.

I suppose the laws are good enough to deter pedophiles to some extant, along with the no-laws that society dishes out to those who abuse. Problem is, the mind goes into a delicate place, and these young girls are not sure if they are being raped.

[Taors]

If they say "Yes...yes I want you to fuck me right now, I know 100% what I'm doing and the consequences of said action, and I give my full consent", is it okay?

[Lindsey]

Not sure if they're being raped?  Yes is a lot different than no.  If you have some freaky shit going on in your sex life, you make up a code word in place of just plain "no". 

[Brent]

As far as consent and sex go, I don't think the problem is that people are having sex too young, or even that old geezers are having sex with 14 year olds.  I think the problem is that we are neglecting to equip and educate our young on how to deal with sex by the time they reach sexual maturity.  I'm sorry if you disagree with evolution, God, or whoever you think is responsible for the age at which people reach fruition, but it is what it is.  People are pretty much able to procreate by the time they leave middle school (many even earlier), if they so desire.  If you like evolution, this means that at some point in human history, someone who could procreate by age 13 or 14 was most likely to have successful offspring.  This includes having the necessary abilities to raise the child to sexual maturity.  If you're more of a fan of magic sky friends, then consider this:  You believe that God created humans.  If this is true, then God created people in such a way that they could, and would have a strong desire to, create babies by 13 or 14.  If you think people shouldn't start having sex when God determined they should be equipped to, doesn't that mean you think God is wrong? 

[Richard_III]

Not sure if they're being raped?  Yes is a lot different than no.  If you have some freaky shit going on in your sex life, you make up a code word in place of just plain "no". 

Have you ever been persuaded into doing something you kinda didn't really want to do? It's like that, but on a soul-numbing level.