The Free Talk Live BBS
Free Talk Live => The Polling Pit => Topic started by: MobileDigit on April 11, 2007, 01:47:41 PM
-
I don't think this term makes sense. You can call something a democracy because it has clearly defined regions (all the people that can vote), but how can one make a logical distinction between government and a gang?
-
Who cares?
-
Me.
-
That's not a good reason.
-
Why not?
-
You're being emotional.
-
How?
-
Think about it.
-
How?
By caring.
-
How?
By caring.
According to Lindsey one does not need feelings to care.
-
Just as we call outer space "a vacuum", we can call a region "an anarchy".
-
Just as we call outer space "a vacuum", we can call a region "an anarchy".
This doesn't answer my question:
how can one make a logical distinction between government and a gang?
-
How?
By caring.
According to Lindsey one does not need feelings to care.
I wasn't aware that Lindsey was the Decider.
-
how can one make a logical distinction between government and a gang?
Governments say they rightfully own you. Other kinds of gangs don't.
-
Anarchy is a noun, but not all nouns are correctly preceded by articles (as in "an anarchy.") For example: "Anarchy is the state of being without rule." "Anarchy is good."
-
how can one make a logical distinction between government and a gang?
Governments say they rightfully own you. Other kinds of gangs don't.
Don't they implicitly by aggressing against you?
-
how can one make a logical distinction between government and a gang?
Functionally, there is no distinction between government and a gang. Why is this distinction relevant?
-
Functionally, there is no distinction between government and a gang. Why is this distinction relevant?
Because if one uses the term an anarchy it implies that there are clearly defined edges.