Sick cat killing pics

[infinitywraith]

[Mort]

Your fucking sick pictures here.

You fucking suck dude. You fucking suck ass. What the fuck is your problem? That's a little kitten you fucking asshole. Why would you stoop to posting this picture? You are a sick fuck, and I wish I could do more than ignore you stupid ass for putting something like that here.

God I wish I could find the bitch who did that.

[Russell Griswold]

God I wish I could find the bitch who did that.

The internet already did. 

[Mort]

God I wish I could find the bitch who did that.

The internet already did. 

Well the internet won't beat her black and blue for killing an innocent kitten. God, think about how FUCKED UP you would have to be to take money to do that to defenseless kitten.

[Alex Libman]

I'm going to reply to this thread on the assumption that everyone has put "infinitywraith" on ignore or used AdBlock on those images, because some people might experience psychological harm from viewing those pictures, and I would hate to exacerbate that harm by bumping this thread.  But viewing those pictures is exactly what you should have expected when clicking on a hyperlink that says "sick cat killing pics"!  And I've seen thousands of pics like this, videos too - the latter being far more disturbing, especially because of the sound, and because you know for sure the animal is still alive.  It hasn't made me a better person.


That said...

I believe that animals are property, and no one should ever be punished for torturing them.  And this genre of pictures should be legal as well, as should any conceivable combination of 1's and 0's.

Anyone who initiates aggression against a person for torturing animals is committing a crime, and it is as much in my interest to bring them to justice as any other criminal.  You don't get to dictate how other people behave just because you feel emotional about something!  Rights come from economic necessity, not your subjective sense of repugnance or pity!

[Lindsey]

Okay, let me explain something.  Those pictures were posted in multiple threads last night that were completely impertinent to cat killing pictures.  I nicely asked the OP to slow down the posting of cat killing pictures, and I don't know if he got the message last night before he logged off or what.  He responded after making this thread, and very nicely has not done again that I know of.  I'd say that's pretty damn fair.

I do think it's gross, and I have to say, I almost puked up whatever I had eaten last.  But...   

There is nothing wrong with this thread.  Alex is correct, this is what one should expect when clicking on this thread - and it is posted in the forum specific to offensive material. 

[YixilTesiphon]

Why?

Because the debates going on the forums seem to consist of religious monarchy and umm... constructive threads by Ian... but... I was just.. having some fun right?

[Mort]

I'm going to reply to this thread on the assumption that everyone has put "infinitywraith" on ignore or used AdBlock on those images, because some people might experience psychological harm from viewing those pictures, and I would hate to exacerbate that harm by bumping this thread.  But viewing those pictures is exactly what you should have expected when clicking on a hyperlink that says "sick cat killing pics"!  And I've seen thousands of pics like this, videos too - the latter being far more disturbing, especially because of the sound, and because you know for sure the animal is still alive.  It hasn't made me a better person.


That said...

I believe that animals are property, and no one should ever be punished for torturing them.  And this genre of pictures should be legal as well, as should any conceivable combination of 1's and 0's.

Anyone who initiates aggression against a person for torturing animals is committing a crime, and it is as much in my interest to bring them to justice as any other criminal.  You don't get to dictate how other people behave just because you feel emotional about something!  Rights come from economic necessity, not your subjective sense of repugnance or pity!

Lindsey, Anton, the guys that distribute this shit are sick and the motherfuckers that make it - TEXTBOOK SOCIOPATHS! Hello, lack of empathy, lack of conscience, no remorse, torture defenseless animals?! I know you guys are right, yes, in my head I know animals are just property, but this kind of behavior is indicative of some FUCKED up people. God, I wish I could find these sick fucks, AGH! It's like watching people get beheaded by some terrorist fucks on television, I feel so helpless, it makes me wanna go to fucking war! Yes, its just a kitten - but at the same time, its a defenseless little kitten! I wanna put the bitch that did that in a cage. I want to stick needles in her and ask her questions about her fucked up head. I wanna cut off her arms and legs, put out her eyes, cut out her tongue and throw her into a porta-poddy and let her fucking rot and bloat alive in human shit. These people, the ones that do this, are the exact same ones that wouldn't give a shit about shooting you in the back of your head to take your shoes and wear em for a day. These people are incapable of understanding the Non-Aggression axiom like you and I. They're only fit to be enemies and target practice. Fuck them.

[Russell Griswold]

Lindsey, Anton,

You got the wrong Eastern European, there. 
That post was by Alex.

[Alex Libman]

No, "~* LCPLIC3 *~ <3", you are a textbook sociopath for reacting this way!

Since when are animals defenseless?  When my ancestors were being chased by sabertooth tigers it was every species for itself, but now that we've won we're the bad guy!  Humbug!  And animals in the wild torture and kill their prey all the time, even when they're not hungry.  It's called sport.  (I guess Animal Planet doesn't mention that for its own interests.)

Since when is lack of compassion for animals abnormal?  We eat them all the time!  And don't give me any bull about the need for nourishment making it excusable while the need for whatever psychological advantage cruelty to animals brings being inexcusable.  Most ancient religions involved some form of animal sacrifice!  Animal testing is pretty much the basis of modern science and medicine!  Who died and made your subjective sense of value to rule with an iron fist over everyone else?

The overwhelming majority of felines alive today are alive as pets for our pleasure.  Little house kitties evolved to be cute and cuddly.  Most people will enjoy treating them compassionately, but some will prefer sick sadistic torture.  Maybe this person believes that to avoid the "bad karma" for killing one cat she needs to donate enough money to a pet shelter to rescue 10 cats that would otherwise be killed, as they routinely are?  And in a free market the concept of karma would have an actual financial benefit: a person might be ostracized for doing bad things to animals, but forgiven for doing good.

I can relate to the anger you describe because I feel the same anger whenever I see a YouTube video of cops roughing up a protester, or other abuses by the government.  Now there is a case of sadism vs helplessness!  I can relate to the "don't taze me bro" guy.  I cannot relate to being a cat - nor a mouse that that cat might have had for breakfast, killing it in a very similar way.  Human values apply to human situations.  Applying them to rocks, plants, dolls, or subhuman animals is a logical fallacy.  As I have said above: rights come from economic necessity, not your subjective sense of repugnance or pity!

Using your emotions to justify an irrational act against another human being: that's exactly what sociopaths do.  That lady, on the other hand - who knows...  She might be using kitty torture to deal with the stress of working long hours to find the cure for cancer.  It's a more disgusting means of relaxing than smoking or kiddy porn, I agree.  Though not as disgusting as watching Oprah.

[Mort]

No, "~* LCPLIC3 *~ <3", you are a textbook sociopath for reacting this way!

Since when are animals defenseless?  When my ancestors were being chased by sabertooth tigers it was every species for itself, but now that we've won we're the bad guy!  Humbug!  And animals in the wild torture and kill their prey all the time, even when they're not hungry.  It's called sport.  (I guess Animal Planet doesn't mention that for its own interests.)

Since when is lack of compassion for animals abnormal?  We eat them all the time!  And don't give me any bull about the need for nourishment making it excusable while the need for whatever psychological advantage cruelty to animals brings being inexcusable.  Most ancient religions involved some form of animal sacrifice!  Animal testing is pretty much the basis of modern science and medicine!  Who died and made your subjective sense of value to rule with an iron fist over everyone else?

The overwhelming majority of felines alive today are alive as pets for our pleasure.  Little house kitties evolved to be cute and cuddly.  Most people will enjoy treating them compassionately, but some will prefer sick sadistic torture.  Maybe this person believes that to avoid the "bad karma" for killing one cat she needs to donate enough money to a pet shelter to rescue 10 cats that would otherwise be killed, as they routinely are?  And in a free market the concept of karma would have an actual financial benefit: a person might be ostracized for doing bad things to animals, but forgiven for doing good.

I can relate to the anger you describe because I feel the same anger whenever I see a YouTube video of cops roughing up a protester, or other abuses by the government.  Now there is a case of sadism vs helplessness!  I can relate to the "don't taze me bro" guy.  I cannot relate to being a cat - nor a mouse that that cat might have had for breakfast, killing it in a very similar way.  Human values apply to human situations.  Applying them to rocks, plants, dolls, or subhuman animals is a logical fallacy.  As I have said above: rights come from economic necessity, not your subjective sense of repugnance or pity!

Using your emotions to justify an irrational act against another human being: that's exactly what sociopaths do.  That lady, on the other hand - who knows...  She might be using kitty torture to deal with the stress of working long hours to find the cure for cancer.  It's a more disgusting means of relaxing than smoking or kiddy porn, I agree.  Though not as disgusting as watching Oprah.

+1, you're right. I'm thinking, the entire time while I'm reading, "Whatever, whatever, whatever..." until I hit the point about eating animals. And then I think to myself "Dude, you just had fucking Burger king like 30 minutes ago and you want to kill a human being over a cat?! Do you know what they do to the cattle?" It's the senselessness of it I guess. You're right, its total lunacy to want to kill someone over a cat, no matter how fucked up I think they are. Just put the asshole on ignore forever and move on. I eat dead mutilated animals everyday, who the fuck am I to start flying off the handle? Still, fuck, its a kitten though, you know? Bitch is lucky it wasn't a puppy, I would have started calling in grids, lol. Whatever, its disturbing, but live and let live. I'll just ignore the fuckers.

[Rillion]

+1, you're right. I'm thinking, the entire time while I'm reading, "Whatever, whatever, whatever..." until I hit the point about eating animals. And then I think to myself "Dude, you just had fucking Burger king like 30 minutes ago and you want to kill a human being over a cat?! Do you know what they do to the cattle?"

They don't do what was done to that kitten.  Yes, I know sometimes the stun gun in the slaughter house doesn't work quite like it should, and sometimes the cows are kept alive longer than they should be.....but there's still a difference between killing an animal for food and just torturing it to death so somebody can wank to it.  You shouldn't eat at Burger King, but it's not because killing animals for food is as sadistic as torturing a kitten.  It's because Burger King burgers are lousy. 

[Alex Libman]

Felines in the wild do something pretty similar to an animal every time they eat, and sometimes just for fun.  A tiger, leopard, or some other large cat named after an Apple operating system would do that to you given a chance, and so would any household cat if it was hungry enough, and/or if you were small enough.  Risk of being tortured to death by a bigger animal is a price you pay for being alive, and even more so for being domesticated.  Domestication isn't all balls of string and kitty litter, it's a two way street!

[Rillion]

Felines in the wild do something pretty similar to an animal every time they eat, and sometimes just for fun.  A tiger, leopard, or some other large cat named after an Apple operating system would do that to you given a chance, and so would any household cat if it was hungry enough, and/or if you were small enough.  Risk of being tortured to death by a bigger animal is a price you pay for being alive, and even more so for being domesticated.  Domestication isn't all balls of string and kitty litter, it's a two way street!

I would never use what animals do in the wild as justification for what humans should do to animals.  You can pretend you're a lion if you want to, but I prefer to be a human being. 

[Alex Libman]

And what is a human being?  Oops, you can't answer that question scientifically, you just declared science to be immoral.  Now all you need is a creation fairy tale of some sort, and you'll have yourself a religion.