 
|
This board is closed to new users and new posts. Thank you to all our great mods and users over the years. Details here.
|
|
The Free Talk Live BBS
Profile of tittiger
Show Posts Messages
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
46
General / To the Gentleman that is so poor that he thinks he can't afford to move to Keen
« on: October 04, 2010, 10:03:48 PM »
Heard a guy call in that really wanted to get to Keen but did not think that he could afford the move.
I am in the same boat my brother!
Buy a van and move in the spring and you can live in the van for 6 months while you look around and get settled....
I think one good way to do this if possible is to buy a few acres between a few folks where there is not building code and work together as much as the participants are willing to share and cut costs. Renting in the city is just a never ending expense IMHO.
I moved to Missouri hoping to do exactly that -- I just have not met the right folks yet.
Hit me up for ideas I have thought this through for years and have much rural living experience.
-- Joe
I am in the same boat my brother!
Buy a van and move in the spring and you can live in the van for 6 months while you look around and get settled....
I think one good way to do this if possible is to buy a few acres between a few folks where there is not building code and work together as much as the participants are willing to share and cut costs. Renting in the city is just a never ending expense IMHO.
I moved to Missouri hoping to do exactly that -- I just have not met the right folks yet.
Hit me up for ideas I have thought this through for years and have much rural living experience.
-- Joe
47
General / Second amendment for felons?
« on: September 09, 2010, 05:19:09 PM »
Absolutely for sure! ( I have tried to email you guys directly but you keep that top secret I see. 
)
It is my belief that at the time the second amendment was written a felon was someone convicted of a crime
for which the death penalty could be imposed. If the newly and inaccurately defined "so called felons" do not
have the inalienable right to self defense then what the heck does inalienable mean?
That means that in almost every case where the feds deny this right to "so called felons" (Felons that did not
commit a crime that the death penalty applies to.) then the law is not Constitutional! And who judges Constitutionality anyhow?
You and I of course. I challenge you to find that right delegated to the supreme court anywhere in the Constitution.
IMHO the states should use nullification for all other guns laws! The heck with going to court. That is absurd. You do not go to court to get your rights granted. http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/09/08/with-or-without-federal-permission/ That is just insane.
Personally I think denying self defense to ANYONE is too much of a slippery slope. Look as the so called "prohibited possessor laws" if you are not convinced. That slope must be a Teflon coated slope.
The best course of action would be to change the second amendment to mean NO laws can be written by the feds to infringe on that right PERIOD, NO EXCEPTIONS, or have your State leave the Union if you have to. One does NOT compromise on inalienable rights.
Do no forget this quote: "The greatest threat to our liberties is our willingness to take them from others." -- Unknown
)It is my belief that at the time the second amendment was written a felon was someone convicted of a crime
for which the death penalty could be imposed. If the newly and inaccurately defined "so called felons" do not
have the inalienable right to self defense then what the heck does inalienable mean?
That means that in almost every case where the feds deny this right to "so called felons" (Felons that did not
commit a crime that the death penalty applies to.) then the law is not Constitutional! And who judges Constitutionality anyhow?
You and I of course. I challenge you to find that right delegated to the supreme court anywhere in the Constitution.
IMHO the states should use nullification for all other guns laws! The heck with going to court. That is absurd. You do not go to court to get your rights granted. http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/09/08/with-or-without-federal-permission/ That is just insane.
Personally I think denying self defense to ANYONE is too much of a slippery slope. Look as the so called "prohibited possessor laws" if you are not convinced. That slope must be a Teflon coated slope.
The best course of action would be to change the second amendment to mean NO laws can be written by the feds to infringe on that right PERIOD, NO EXCEPTIONS, or have your State leave the Union if you have to. One does NOT compromise on inalienable rights.
Do no forget this quote: "The greatest threat to our liberties is our willingness to take them from others." -- Unknown