Welcome to the Free Talk Live bulletin board system!
This board is closed to new users and new posts.  Thank you to all our great mods and users over the years.  Details here.
185859 Posts in 9829 Topics by 1371 Members
Latest Member: cjt26
Home Help
+  The Free Talk Live BBS
|-+  Profile of alaric89
| |-+  Show Posts
| | |-+  Messages

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - alaric89

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 123
General / Re: Are "libertines" dangerous?
« on: February 12, 2014, 04:39:48 PM »
Does Michael W Dean have that fetish?
Does everybody in a gay parade have that fetish?
Do those religious people who believe womaen infurior have that fetish?
Rare my ass. Derrick J is the only libertine type I know of who I have never heard mention his lifestyle unless asked about it. I think libertines by definition have to be loud about it. A quiet gay couple who do nothing but maybe hold hands in public, (or any couple who keep happy fun time to themselves for that matter) are not really libertines at all are they?

General / Re: Are "libertines" dangerous?
« on: February 12, 2014, 11:41:21 AM »
Well said. Do you think my view on not really wanting to see it is reasonable? I don't want to see somebody slapping their spouse around. Concentual or not.

General / Re: Are "libertines" dangerous?
« on: February 11, 2014, 06:39:00 PM »
I linked to this thread from the video. It is currently on the top comment. When I tried to direct download on your post it didn't work. 

General / Re: Liberty Lovers !!!! The idea of the State is NOT your enemy.
« on: February 11, 2014, 06:19:46 PM »
Well at least you would be moved to the front of the line on calls, so you wouldn't be on hold very long.

General / Re: Are "libertines" dangerous?
« on: February 11, 2014, 05:55:37 PM »
Well goody. The download link on this page doesn't work though. I linked this thread from that video on youtube so it would be nice if it did.

General / Re: Are "libertines" dangerous?
« on: February 11, 2014, 03:07:57 AM »
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/della-wolf-is-b-c-s-1st-child-with-3-parents-on-birth-certificate-1.2526584 Liz Zish, my alturnative facebook friend, who likes to be dominated, so she cools my hatered for pussy assed "tops" a little- shared this on facebook. I am pretty sure we will probably come to the conclusion that judgemental people suck.

General / Re: Free Thought Association Game
« on: February 11, 2014, 02:56:02 AM »

General / Re: Are "libertines" dangerous?
« on: February 11, 2014, 02:55:04 AM »
The key word is "thrive". Alturnative lifestyles don't produce a lot of children who grow up into successful adults, do they? I have read that lifestylers are more stable mentally but I don't know their track record on parenthood. Penn and Teller showed a lesbian couple who had happy children, but they seemed almost vanilla except for the penis lacking thing.

General / Are "libertines" dangerous?
« on: February 10, 2014, 05:26:29 PM »
Libertarians Are Not Libertines  I kind of thought the argument turned out to be against homosexuality. I don't think just being gay would make anybody a bad parent, so I strongly disagree on that. He brings a good point though, there has to be a line somewhere in how whacky behaviour the liberty movement should except for it to thrive. Where would a reasonable libertarian draw the line?
 I kind of have my little crusade against people who need to dominate their lover. I decided that if someone wants to submit to the will of someone in private it is not my problem, but slapping or yelling at your sub in public and it is. Also someone imprisoning another, even concentually, and I have a problem. Especially if the "guardian" won't let anyone talk to the charge.
 I happen to know that these are hard subjects to discuss, but anyone who wishes to do so is welcome to chime in. I would like easy answers and I don't have any.

General / Re: Liberty Lovers !!!! The idea of the State is NOT your enemy.
« on: February 02, 2014, 05:32:58 PM »
This is a tough one for a state hater.
The hate comes from the state evoking hate by overstepping natural boundaries.

A state wholly within its natural boundaries would likely evoke love.

It is not the idea of the state that ought to be judged harshly,
but rather the actions of certain states which step out where their founders wish was that they never go.

That is the funniest thing I have read for a long time. In a way it is perfect. Can someone make a meme with Reasonable Voice's brilliant post on that famous hippy girl with dreadlocks? Or maybe Yoda if he fell to the darkside.

Fine I'll quite trying to guess.

General / Re: Liberty Lovers !!!! The idea of the State is NOT your enemy.
« on: February 02, 2014, 05:03:10 PM »
On the Joe Rogan Experience with Peter Schiff, Joe hammered home that very point. Capitalisms track record is indeed less then steller on the enviroment. Even though strong governments record is a lot worse, I happen to know the government forced cleaner cars and cleaned up a lot of water bodies, I am old enough to remember smog and burning rivers. This is a tough one for a state hater. I think private trustees would grab up large tracks of land for parks, but I honestly think cars would still be spewing out CO1 without government mandate.

Your married? How the hell should I know that. I meant no offense.

General / Re: Don't initiate violence?
« on: February 02, 2014, 03:55:07 PM »
I know the goals of liberty can not come from violence, but to be honest I don't think I could just stand there and watch some thugs taze a 7 month pregnant chick.
Am I just old fashion and wrong? Or is there a line when one can honorably start retaliating the hard way?
When can one initiate violence?
Adam Kokesh proved that even feining aggression towards the state will lead to bad things. Be simpathetic, polite and practice damage control when in a conflict with a state employee. That is your best bet to help everybody young man. I also think you were confused. Defense doesn't violate the NAP, with that said it is never moral to initiate aggression.

I went back and corrected my posts. The traffic has improved a lot lately, probably thanks to people like yourself and that fellow with autism. Thank you BTW.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 123

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 32 queries.