Messages

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

31

General / Re: Drama in the Free State

« on: January 31, 2012, 02:45:11 PM »

I don't hate you. I admit I made the mistake of presuming strong feelings in other people and I've corrected that in my post.

But I do think I've made myself clear and you're pretending not to get it. I didn't give a reason why I can't stand you other than you're a drama queen and I can't stand drama queens. That's a personal judgment call (that lots of people happen to agree with me about but when it comes to me deciding whether I can't stand to be around someone, OR ARGUE WITH THEM ENDLESSLY, my personal judgment is the only thing that ultimately counts). You're trying to make it about our latest interaction so you can lawyer about it.

And you can try to make it about your court shit. I don't know much about it and don't want to because I don't care. I'm trying to avoid your shit. If someone can't stand you, they just can't stand you. I tried to be private about it and just end communication, but that was hopeless. You know why? Because you're drama queens! You said only six people that you know of don't like you which was an inaccurate statement (I'll chalk it up to a short memory) which I ever so briefly corrected, speaking only for myself. You want to have a big drag out public lawyering session about why people don't like you and how they have no right to not like you.

Think... about... that... slowly.

Again, I'm not trying to lawyer you, I'm trying to human you. I'm not a lawyer. I'm not engaging in lawyer tactics. I'm not taking you to court or serving you with cease and desist orders. I've made rational arguments to support my opinions, something pretty much all of us do. So quit trying to put me down in that fashion and choose another.

Let me amend my statement about "the six". Those people REALLY do not like me. With them there is nothing I can do to rectify the situation directly, and for most of them I wouldn't if I could. I don't like them, either.
The other people I spoke with probably did not like me somehow. Many said they had nothing against me, others listed a few personality traits that they did not like (such as my propensity to interrupt and talk over them, something I began working to correct as soon as it was brought to my attention, and yes after I was made aware of it I began to notice it myself), some, again, I was not really a fan of so I didn't bother asking them. I didn't know/think you were on any of those lists, so I didn't contact you. We haven't had much interaction in the recent past.

If you don't like me because you perceive me as a drama whore, fine, ok. There is little I can do about that besides trying to be less involved in drama. The thing is though its all up to each individual as to what they perceive as 'drama'. In this case with Mackler I don't perceive it as drama but rather standing up for a friend and good person (even though that person is not a Porcupine), and doing whats right. And I'll point out that its mostly been people who are NOT me who've been dragging this into the court of public opinion (despite claims stating otherwise). I know it wasn't me who started threads about this on two different forums (plus this drama thread), and also create a dedicated webpage for such. In fact I'm doing my best to NOT reply to whats being posted because I understand its (in addition to trying to erode support) an attempt to get me to say things in public that can be used against me in court.

All the best to you, Dale. I'm REALLY not trying to lawyer you, or make you change your mind via forum posts.

32

General / Re: Drama in the Free State

« on: January 31, 2012, 01:03:42 PM »

I just hope you guys can appreciate the sacrifice I just made. I just threw myself onto the bloody altar of the demons of drama queen Hell.

God... damn it.

This is really hilarious. You claim to hate me with a passion due to a private conversation regarding moderation in which I never attacked you personally, which, btw, is basically the only meaningful interaction we've had since PorcFest, yet we're the childish ones. Got it.

And I love how you're accusing me of 'lawyering up' when any normal person would call it rational discourse and defending a position. I'm no lawyer, and I'm currently being buried in lawyer generated paperwork, so to accuse me of being lawyer-y is pretty hilarious.

But whatever, Dale, go on and hate me for whatever reasons you want. That's your decision, not mine.

33

General / Re: Drama in the Free State

« on: January 30, 2012, 05:59:43 PM »

Maybe we shouldn't judge them at all about their private lives, and by the way my track record is less then stellar for relationships so I would have no business doing so anyway.
Seems like trouble seems to follow Curtis (from my full of shit 2000 mile away perspective) is all I am saying, but I am starting to wonder if my perspective is slighted because it is based on testimonials from jealous people.

Bingo. You should have seen the reaction of the Manch forum when Mackler tried this there: 400 comments re: dicks

So he goes to the Keene forum (SS.com is still a Keene forum, despite appearances), and claims hes spoken to my 'victims'... LOL, I take such very seriously, and did so long before Adam Mackler came along. I've listed all the people who I thought did not like me, and talked to those who's opinions I cared about. Most were a misunderstanding of some sort (most on my end for thinking they did not like me). That whittled the list down maybe six people: my ex (who has been talking shit for the last year +, and refuses mediation because she doesn't want to stop "warning people" about me), a couple guys who resent the fact I'm with Robin, a guy who embezzled some legal defense funds, Boner Joe and Mackler. I've literally sought out potential victims of my past actions, to inquire if restitution and amends need to be made, and come up empty handed. People refuse to make a claim against me, because I haven't actually created any victims. Been a dick? Sure. But no victims.

34

General / Re: Drama in the Free State

« on: January 30, 2012, 04:25:07 PM »

Oh, and I think hes trying to whittle away at our support because he was a bit miffed when at the first hearing (where we secured a continuance because the Judge WANTS to hear from Jake on the subject of this 99 year lease [for just $100/year]) we had about a dozen supporters show up and he had none.

35

General / Re: Drama in the Free State

« on: January 30, 2012, 04:13:05 PM »

http://forum.shiresociety.com/the-shire-society/mackler-vs-curtis-and-robin/

Part of Mackler's response to our "massive smear campaign". This is one of three posts on three different websites, one of which he created just for the purpose (defending himself against our "massive smear campaign").

The truth is Mackler now senses defeat in court and this is one of the ways in which he has chosen to respond (the other is by dumping a mountain of legal paperwork on us). It tickles me! He's really frightened of having Jake testify. We think one of the reasons for all the paperwork is a legal rule which allows the judge to make a decision based upon the paperwork, without hearing any witnesses.

I'll be sure to post the video from the Feb 23rd hearing, but I bet by then people will no longer care (especially when such will prove to vindicate us). Until then we're just preparing ourselves for court, as honestly responding to all the lies hes been posting would take up too much time (ironic considering he claims we've got nothing better to do than spend all day making up lies about him). Seriously I tried to count all the intentional lies in that post and gave up because its so long and there are so many. I'll just be taking screen shots of everything he posts and have it with me in court.

36

The Rubber Room - Not Safe for Work / Re: Does Dalebert assert his homosexuality too much?

« on: January 20, 2012, 09:48:46 AM »

No way! I haven't heard him mention the house boy opening in quite some time, and he now has TWO houses! That should mean DOUBLE the house boy mentions, not less!

37

General / Re: Boner Joe Owes Me Money

« on: December 24, 2011, 09:33:29 PM »

ITS DOCUMENTED FACT that this is the highest crime area of the state.

Its all relative. There is absolutely no where in NH that compares to the ghettos in Wilmington, NC, which is nothing compared to so many other areas.

I was just thinking in the car on the way home that this website and forum post is not helping me one bit in repaying this debt. I pretty much wasted the past 24 hours feeling I need to defend myself over everyone's critiques.

Now you understand why I didn't respond to your stolen food bullshit.

38

General / Re: Boner Joe Owes Me Money

« on: December 24, 2011, 09:52:51 AM »

For the record, I've YET to see a 'ghetto' in New Hampshire.

39

General / Re: Dllama in the Free State

« on: December 23, 2011, 01:36:13 PM »

I'm told the PF2012 organizer(s) have seen it and found it very interesting/insightful.

So, why weren't you picked to organize Porcfest for next year? With the claim that you raised all those funds on your own and your privatizing idea, I don't see why they would let you go.

Because I made FAR too many people butthurt. Not out-of-staters, and first time PorcFest attendees, but the old timers who think they need to be worshiped because they moved before you or I did. Basically damage control got to be too much for the prez so she made the expedient political decision. (also, a week or two before PorcFest the stress got to me and I told her I didnt want to do it again. She wouldn't let me change my mind)

btw its not a claim. Its documented fact.

40

General / Re: Dllama in the Free State

« on: December 23, 2011, 01:12:54 PM »

Nothing I've said in this or any other drama thread hasn't been sourced by me either through a conversation with someone I trust isn't lying or by a forum or Facebook post.

in other words, absent a citation, HEARSAY

see sig

41

General / Re: Dllama in the Free State

« on: December 23, 2011, 12:59:57 PM »

Yes I have an unpaid debt. I fail to see how that has anything to do with the drama I just posted.

What drama? The drama you're making up? The drama you "heard" but didn't bother to source or cite?

See sig

42

General / Re: Dllama in the Free State

« on: December 23, 2011, 12:48:35 PM »

Why are you defending yourself? I never named names or the venue.

Oh no! Guess I'm feeling guilty, eh? LOL

Come on, who else could you be rumor mongering about?

Boner Joe, FTL drama whore, repeatedly defaults on $5k loan from Coconut, owes $7115

43

General / Re: Dllama in the Free State

« on: December 23, 2011, 12:43:37 PM »

Boner Joe, FTL drama whore, repeatedly defaults on $5k loan from Coconut, owes $7115

44

General / Re: Dllama in the Free State

« on: December 23, 2011, 12:42:00 PM »

In fact, I've heard (from two different sources) that this person has left the festival fund so dry that they weren't able to reserve the premises for the following year. There is enough concern with lack of funds that someone has proposed renting at least one building using their own money and donations to make sure that the event happens on the scheduled date.

BWA HA HA HA HA

Either YOU are being sold a bill of goods, or you're making this bs up yourself.

There is no 'Festival Fund'. *I* raised ALL funds for PorcFest 2011 starting from scratch, and without taking one dime from the FSP. Previously, as I've been quoted saying, PF Organizers had money/credit they could invest at the beginning of the organization, only to repay themselves on the back end. I did not have this option, so I had to raise every dollar needed, starting with zero (I also wanted to show that PF didnt need FSP investment/involvement. I succeeded.). It sure would have been a lot easier had someone given me this $25k fictitious loan, but that never happened.

Furthermore, Roger's campground does not require upfront payment for facilities. They take that one the last day of the festival. Given the relationship they know 'we're' good for it, and they've never been let down.

On top of that the proposal for selling off the venues to third parties is MINE. I have the proof, and plenty of witnesses. The proposal is called "A Proposal for Decentralizing and Privatizing PorcFest". I can send you a pdf copy, if you like. It was finished/'published' just a few weeks after PorcFest 2011. I'm told the PF2012 organizer(s) have seen it and found it very interesting/insightful. I was asked not to make it REALLY public, as that might confuse people, and skew the new organizer(s) plans, so it made the rounds on the DL, informally.


But all this stupidity is just your attempt to make people pay attention to anything but YOUR inability to fulfill contractual obligations. Its not even a good attempt.

45

General / Re: Dllama in the Free State

« on: December 23, 2011, 12:19:52 PM »

Freestater refuses to pay back $25k loan and misappropriates $10k in festival funds...story developing.

You mean you haven't had time to make the story up, yet?

Notice the difference between what you post and what I post.

You: "I heard..."

Me: "Quote, link"