 
|
This board is closed to new users and new posts. Thank you to all our great mods and users over the years. Details here.
|
|
The Free Talk Live BBS
Profile of Sovereign Curtis
Show Posts Messages
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
1
General / Re: Drama in the Free State
« on: July 22, 2012, 10:39:21 AM »Please everyone, please donate at least $500 to Rich Paul! Thank you!
bahahaha, no. I can't believe anyone would donate to Rich Paul, after he pocketed the last funds meant for his "legal defense". That's called embezzlement, folks, and its why this new chip-in basically states you will be funding his food, gas, and party supplies, with maybe a little going towards his legal defense.
2
General / Re: Drama in the Free State
« on: July 19, 2012, 12:54:08 PM »Why isn't BonerJoe trumpeting the horns about Rich Paul having a 'survival' chip-in?
No one cares.
Were it Robin and I asking people to pay for our basic necessities, you can damn sure bet Boner Joe would care.
3
General / Re: Drama in the Free State
« on: July 17, 2012, 12:02:16 PM »
Why isn't BonerJoe trumpeting the horns about Rich Paul having a 'survival' chip-in?
Also: ONH GA 7/15/12
Also: ONH GA 7/15/12
4
General / Re: Drama in the Free State
« on: May 31, 2012, 08:38:31 AM »Mackler is a attorney? Explains why his posts from la-la land make little sense to me.
Yes, Mackler is an NH accredited lawyer.
Btw, I'm not the only one who figured out #3. The bank's lawyers, who are very experienced, figured that out, as well. Had that case gone to trial they wouldn't have pulled any punches, and it would have come out that an NH lawyer had used the NH justice system to deprive a corporation of it's property, in felony violation of RSA 545a. Furthermore, the mountain of evidence I have is also damning on another level: his ability to practice law in NH. Just his smear website alone is enough for a complaint to the BAR association (something a lawyer who is unaffiliated with this case tells me I MUST do, to protect the profession. He is/was aghast that another lawyer would act so unprofessionally).
5
General / Re: Drama in the Free State
« on: May 30, 2012, 10:19:14 AM »
You know, I find it very odd that some people persist in believing anything Mackler says, so long as its critical of myself and Robin.
Here is a run-down of just three of the Mackler lies that have been exposed:
1. Lie: Adam Mackler was not responsible for the eviction of Jacob Trombley & co.
Truth: He evicted Jacob Trombley. Despite the elaborate story he weaves on the "Robin Lies" webpage on his personal website, I possess, and have posted online, the Writs of Possession which prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Adam Mackler was in fact the person SOLELY responsible for the eviction of the 1st floor. In his account of what 'really' happened, he swears he is only telling the truth. This is a complete lie.
2. Lie: He was unsure on 11/1/11 if the property had been sold.
Truth: He was completely aware that the property had been sold at an eviction sale. If you listen to the first audio I post from the Nov 1st eviction hearing vs Jacob Trombley, you'll hear Adam Mackler (an NH accredited attorney) lie to the judge and tell him that he has only heard RUMORS of an eviction sale. Fast forward to Mackler's eviction hearing vs Me n Robin and he admits to the judge that he was not only aware of the eviction sale, HE ATTENDED IT.
3. Lie: He claims to have "sold" the property to the bank.
Truth: Adam Mackler NEVER owned this property. If you check with the Registrar of Deeds you'll find out that Adam Mackler's name has NEVER been on the deed to this property. He only had his name on a lease that was severely lacking in consideration ($100/YEAR for a ~$2.5k/month property), a lease meant to DELAY the bank from taking possession of its property (an intentional violation of RSA 545a http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LV/545-A/545-A-mrg.htm
Here is a run-down of just three of the Mackler lies that have been exposed:
1. Lie: Adam Mackler was not responsible for the eviction of Jacob Trombley & co.
Truth: He evicted Jacob Trombley. Despite the elaborate story he weaves on the "Robin Lies" webpage on his personal website, I possess, and have posted online, the Writs of Possession which prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Adam Mackler was in fact the person SOLELY responsible for the eviction of the 1st floor. In his account of what 'really' happened, he swears he is only telling the truth. This is a complete lie.
2. Lie: He was unsure on 11/1/11 if the property had been sold.
Truth: He was completely aware that the property had been sold at an eviction sale. If you listen to the first audio I post from the Nov 1st eviction hearing vs Jacob Trombley, you'll hear Adam Mackler (an NH accredited attorney) lie to the judge and tell him that he has only heard RUMORS of an eviction sale. Fast forward to Mackler's eviction hearing vs Me n Robin and he admits to the judge that he was not only aware of the eviction sale, HE ATTENDED IT.
3. Lie: He claims to have "sold" the property to the bank.
Truth: Adam Mackler NEVER owned this property. If you check with the Registrar of Deeds you'll find out that Adam Mackler's name has NEVER been on the deed to this property. He only had his name on a lease that was severely lacking in consideration ($100/YEAR for a ~$2.5k/month property), a lease meant to DELAY the bank from taking possession of its property (an intentional violation of RSA 545a http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LV/545-A/545-A-mrg.htm
6
General / Re: BBS users who are coming to Porcfest 2012 -
« on: May 13, 2012, 10:17:28 PM »We don't want Robin or Curtis, the Freeloaders to show up at Porcfest.
Nor, Stacy Litz, the Snitch either.
1. Who are "we"?
2. You're obviously ignorant if you still believe we're freeloaders. Mackler has accepted defeat and moved out. We're still here.
3. Why should anyone care if you don't want me or Robin at PorcFest? If you don't want to associate with us, don't. It's that simple.
4. I find it telling that you list Robin and myself, people only accused of 'free-loading', before you list the known snitch. Haters gonna hate.
7
General / Re: Will Porcfest 2012 be the beginning of the end?
« on: May 07, 2012, 09:47:03 PM »
Irresponsible how?
8
General / Re: Will Porcfest 2012 be the beginning of the end?
« on: May 07, 2012, 01:35:43 PM »Last PorcFest was organized by irresponsible persons, and much irresponsibility was the predictable result.
Thank the various Gods, this year some extremely responsible people have stepped up to the plate. The upshot is that PF will continue into the forseeable future.
ಠ_ಠ
Irresponsible personS? Well considering this year's team is basically last year's team minus yours truly, then this year's team must be irresponsible, as well.
9
Guns, Drugs, and Crazy Independence Stuff / Re: Legal pot growers, talking about legal pot
« on: March 19, 2012, 10:12:16 PM »
As far as cold goes, its a big problem for me. I don't like it. I don't like any climate where exposure can kill you, and burning umpteen-million BTU's is a necessity. I don't particularly care how "free" the rest of the society is; in a SHTF scenario, you're fuckin' dead if you need to acquire combustible energy, and thats a fact. Poor planning and a harsh price for a fuckin' buzz. Places where the grid fails easily and has old infrastructure engineering tends to go down more frequently, which is just inconvenient.
Fuel grows on trees, up here.
12
General / Re: Charles Manson: where's the victim?
« on: February 20, 2012, 08:58:59 PM »
Everything else aside, Manson is now a political prisoner and he KNOWS his parole hearings are a joke, and just an excuse to get him on camera acting crazy, so he gives them what they want.
13
General / Re: Anarchojesse's dad?
« on: February 20, 2012, 08:50:13 PM »I am that 'dude'. He didn't actually pull his weapon, he 'just' made as if to unholster it once (after squaring up on me like we were in the OK Corral), and then when I STILL didn't leave 'his' porch he did the same though this time unsnapping the holster and cocking the pistol. He never actually unholstered his weapon or point it at me, but that was enough for me to end my association with his crazy ass
Did the thought ever enter into your mind to draw on him and pop him one right between the eyes? Like, even in fantasty land?
Honestly, no, as I am a felon and thus not allowed to own or possess a firearm. And I don't fantasize about such. I knew what he was doing was destroying his reputation and credibility, and really until then I considered him a friend and I held out hope while this was going on that he would realize the error of his ways and immediately reverse course. But he persisted in threatening to shoot me if I didn't leave 'his' porch, so I left 'his' porch.
Btw he was upset at me because a bunch of us were going to Dale's that night for a party, and we were talking about it on the porch. Jesse lamented that he couldn't go because he wasn't allowed at Dale's, and tried to guilt us for going without him. I said "It's not my fault you can't keep your mouth shut". That wasn't the reason he wasn't allowed at Dale's, as he demonstrated just after I said that by flying off into a rage and demanding I leave his property 'or else'...
14
General / Re: Anarchojesse's dad?
« on: February 20, 2012, 05:54:06 PM »Anarcho-Jesse did have that infamous and embarrassing "gun on a string" incident during his embarrassing and not well known "gardening in the park at random with no planning like a fool" incident. It showed the world that not only did he not know how to handle a gun, but he didn't know how to garden either.
Yeah he also brandished at some dudes who lipped off at him across the street and then pulled a gun on another dude who didn't move off of "his" (Rented) porch quickly enough.
I am that 'dude'. He didn't actually pull his weapon, he 'just' made as if to unholster it once (after squaring up on me like we were in the OK Corral), and then when I STILL didn't leave 'his' porch he did the same though this time unsnapping the holster and cocking the pistol. He never actually unholstered his weapon or point it at me, but that was enough for me to end my association with his crazy ass
15
Serious Business / Re: Goddammit, Brasky
« on: February 19, 2012, 06:09:09 PM »Hey, motherfucker.
You think I give a fuck?
No, I do not.
This bitch is sociopathic. And yes, you may love her. I completely feel that. But I'm not gonna hold your hand while you hold the hand of a sociopathic motherfuckin bitch. I already done that, like eight times.
I completely feel you bro. I like bitches.
But straight up. She's just a fuckin bitch.
Thats all.
If you can prove to me she's NOT a fuckin bitch, I'll suck your dick. And hers.
Wait, what? Boner Joe has the hots for Michele Seven?!?
That explains SOOO much.