Welcome to the Free Talk Live bulletin board system!
This board is closed to new users and new posts.  Thank you to all our great mods and users over the years.  Details here.
185859 Posts in 9829 Topics by 1371 Members
Latest Member: cjt26
Home Help
+  The Free Talk Live BBS
|-+  Profile of SecretAgent
| |-+  Show Posts
| | |-+  Messages

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - SecretAgent

Pages: 1 [2]
16
General / Re: Sweet JUSTICE
« on: June 06, 2011, 08:47:11 AM »
Except self-defense.

The cop was on a sworn mission to uphold, to the best of its ability, the unjust laws of an unjust government. The cop was on a mission to intimidate citizens into giving up rights.

When a cop is committing unprovoked violence, people are scared to step in and do something about it. They know the cop will become harmless if they kill it, but they know there are other cops that will swarm in and hunt down the person who did it. Dead cops do not respond to calls when another cop starts trouble and cannot finish it. In my correct opinion, the killing of that cop was totally justified.

On 21 February 2007, cops in Toledo, Ohio were chasing a 15-year-old boy who was out after curfew. A curfew is a police state measure. In a police state, the police are the enemy. The victim fought back like a man to defend himself, and the undertaker straightened out one of those cops. It's so simple a child can do it. If voters don't want to wake up one morning and have no police protection, they shouldn't vote for candidates who show depraved indifference or open hostility to the rights of innocent citizens.

Our predecessors, the Abolitionists, made a big mistake, trying to rely on the system controlled by crazy people. Abolitionists tried to reason with crazy people but it doesn't work.

The War on Drugs is the cops versus liberty. Which side are you on?

17
General / Re: Sweet JUSTICE
« on: June 05, 2011, 07:00:09 PM »

Why do I get the feeling that a more accurate name would be AgentProvocateur?  Seriously do you expect people here to get behind the drive by shooting of a cop?  Most here subscribe to the NAP and those that don't realize that these cops will take this as an excuse to crack down on others that don't have the power to resist.  Especially in Texas where "he needed killin" is a legal defense.

Then you can count Ron Paul as an agent provocateur, too.

"But whether the resistance against
government tyrants is nonviolent or
physically violent, the effort to overthrow
state oppression qualifies as true
patriotism."

Congressional Record, 22 May 2007 page H5610
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?dbname=2007_record&page=H5610&position=all

18
General / Re: Sweet JUSTICE
« on: June 05, 2011, 06:55:45 PM »
I'm a FED.

Be careful what you say here.

First and final warning.

An attempt to censor by intimidation.

19
General / Re: Sweet JUSTICE
« on: June 05, 2011, 04:28:39 AM »
Sweet Justice? Guy was just sitting there at a traffic light and some criminal does a cowardly drive by. How can this be construed as self defense?

On 26 December 1776, the British were mostly just passed out from celebrating Christmas when Washington's troops attacked them at Trenton. In a police state, the police are the enemy wherever they are, whatever they happen to be doing.

20
General / Sweet JUSTICE
« on: June 04, 2011, 08:06:15 PM »

On Saturday, 28 May 2011 at two in the morning, a Bexar County cop in San Antonio, Texas was waiting at a traffic light when somebody drove up and opened fire. Victims of police brutality, perjury, enforcement of unjust laws and unreasonable searches and seizures can take comfort that this does happen, cops do get brought to justice.

A lot of men from New Hampshire were at the Battle of Bunker Hill, 17 June 1775. There weren't "good" and "bad" Redcoats and nobody tried to spot the same one that wounded him two months earlier in Concord.

Believe it or not, the cops in Texas are still trying to determine a motive! Like, duh! They're still looking for who did it. They never know who will strike, nor when nor where nor how, and the dispatcher always responds by sending in swarms of targets.

I advocate not catching the license plate of the cop-killer's vehicle if you see something like this.


Pages: 1 [2]

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 30 queries.