 
|
This board is closed to new users and new posts. Thank you to all our great mods and users over the years. Details here.
|
|
The Free Talk Live BBS
Profile of voodoo
Show Posts Messages
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
31
General / Re: Drama in the Free State
« on: January 07, 2011, 07:55:48 PM »Wrong thread...
... unless you're spreading your love around New Hampshire.
32
General / Re: Chaos is the only sensible answer. [TSFW] Cthulhu is awake!!!
« on: January 06, 2011, 02:33:53 PM »
It's entertaining, but full of factual inaccuracies and open calls for violence.
33
General / Re: What to do with intolerant people in the liberty movement?
« on: January 05, 2011, 09:53:12 PM »This jerk is pissing me off, that's what.
Don't pull on Superman's cape.
Don't spit into the wind.
You don't pull the mask off Il Duce's BBS,
and you don't mess around with Jim.
34
General / Re: Drama in the Free State
« on: January 05, 2011, 08:31:17 PM »Sell farmland in WI
use money to buy farmland in NH
money is fungible like that, see
Yes. In fact, don't bother to sell. Just do a straight acre for acre trade for some of the best farmland in the world for a parcel in "the granite state".
Oh, wait. The inbreds would probably want two acres in WI for prime NH disk killing gravel.
35
General / The Circle of Life
« on: January 04, 2011, 10:41:53 PM »
Diapers. Walking. Fast walking. KFC.
http://tv.gawker.com/5724643/watch-a-kfc-employee-completely-lose-it
Cop. KFC. Fast walking. Walking. Diapers.
http://tv.gawker.com/5724643/watch-a-kfc-employee-completely-lose-it
Cop. KFC. Fast walking. Walking. Diapers.
36
General / Re: What to do with intolerant people in the liberty movement?
« on: January 04, 2011, 04:28:30 PM »
Make 'em a mod!
wait...
wait...
37
General / Re: Drama in the Free State
« on: January 04, 2011, 02:34:20 PM »
Sam is creating an economic collapse!
http://freekeene.com/2011/01/03/fare-thee-well-why-some-activists-leave-nh/#more-8716
Quote
Sam Dodson, the talented videographer behind the Obscured Truth Network, is leaving to live on his family’s farm in Texas. He has become convinced that devastating economic collapse is coming and he felt he’d be better able to weather that if he were near his relatives and out away from the city. I do not share his vision for disaster, but I understand why he is making his choice. Personally, I’d rather be going through such a situation nearby hundreds of my fellow liberty lovers, but he has a chance to lower his costs of living significantly by moving to the family farm and wants to focus on self-sufficiency. Maybe someday he’ll get to say “told-ya-so” regarding the supposed disaster, but that remains to be seen.
http://freekeene.com/2011/01/03/fare-thee-well-why-some-activists-leave-nh/#more-8716
38
General / Re: Momma Ally is the new Ed Brown
« on: January 03, 2011, 01:21:32 AM »She probably felt she had a safe place to run, and tried to hide among friends in what she perceived as a safe place when the world had gone mad. She was trying to rebel against the state by not obeying it.
I wonder where she picked up that idea.
Running to NH from financial obligations?
39
General / Re: i had blood drawn by the popo, ama
« on: December 31, 2010, 09:34:54 PM »This isn't fuckin' reddit.
Of course not. Reddit has people participating.
Relevant:
41
General / Re: Momma Ally is the new Ed Brown
« on: December 31, 2010, 05:52:03 PM »Spreading rumors and causing people to prejudge and hurting someones livelyhood goes against the NAP
Though a relatively common belief, this is not true.
A's concept of B belongs to A, not B and is formed solely by A as a result of sensory perception and reason. C's false negative statement, transmitted to A could only influence A's formation of the concept B, not actually form (and, thereby, enhance or harm) it.
C's statement, true or false, positive or negative, cannot be said to be aggression against the property of A (namely, the concept of B) any more than B's statements and actions (true or false, positive or negative).
Likewise, if A can choose to not patronize B's business, the possible transaction is not some property owned by B. So, even if C's false negative statement influenced A's concept of B to the extent that A chooses to forgo trading with B, it is again A who could only possibly be harmed (maybe A missed out on a good deal). But, while you're dealing in maybes, you also have to consider possible positive effects (maybe A found a better deal with someone other than B).
42
General / Re: Momma Ally is the new Ed Brown
« on: December 31, 2010, 02:59:08 PM »So, lets chuck everybody under the bus that shows any character flaw.
How many times does the destructive behavior have to repeat before it becomes more than a "flaw".
How offensive does the behavior have to be before I'm permitted to sever and/or ostracize? Who determines the level, and who's offensiveness scale am I required to use?
44
General / Re: Drama in the Free State
« on: December 30, 2010, 02:42:49 PM »
Sov. Curtis said "20 tickets were sold" on VORD. Is that an accurate number?
45
General / Re: Chaos is the only sensible answer. [TSFW] Cthulhu is awake!!!
« on: December 30, 2010, 02:20:30 AM »
Theft. Priceless.
