Welcome to the Free Talk Live bulletin board system!
This board is closed to new users and new posts.  Thank you to all our great mods and users over the years.  Details here.
185859 Posts in 9829 Topics by 1371 Members
Latest Member: cjt26
Home Help
+  The Free Talk Live BBS
|-+  Profile of LordMarius
| |-+  Show Posts
| | |-+  Messages

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - LordMarius

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8
The Show / Re: What's the Harm
« on: December 20, 2009, 01:02:08 PM »
I wonder how many people science has killed.

Conventional medicine is dangerous, the only thing that is worse is the alternatives.

General / Re: Obama, Bringer of Peace, in Oslo
« on: December 10, 2009, 06:23:26 PM »
What do you think this is? Weird shit.

Plasma discharge, if its not a man-made artifact (camera fuzzing etc). If its what people claim they saw, then its explained rather easily by Plasma Physics. Nature, if what I've read is true, tends to favour certain 'shapes' which is why plasma/electrical phenomena often look similar over many scales: from small plasma clouds modeled in labs, up through cyclones/hurricane all the way to galaxies.
It's the Russians.  They reported having a failed ICBM launch from a submarine.  I guess one of the fins failed causing it to spin out of control in the way it did.

It's always the damn russians.

General / Obama, Bringer of Peace, in Oslo
« on: December 10, 2009, 09:04:44 AM »
This has been quite a day here in Oslo. Your wonderful President, the leader of both The Land Of The Free and The Free World has just been given the Nobel Peace Prize in our City Hall.

It's ironic that such an event has brought our city to a total lockdown. Police officers, armed to the teeth with submachineguns, guard every corner. Gunships hovers low above our fair city. The American police state has descended upon Oslo, and everyone smile proudly, because "we" have awarded the Peace Prize to a man responsible for two wars on foreign soil. The so-called media has played their role as lapdogs by accepting that the Messiah could only be asked one - ONE - question by a Norwegian journalist. Who would be The Chosen One? Of course, one of the government TV station NRK's journalists, Anette Groth. But of course, not even The One Question was answered.

This whole ordeal is embarassing and depressing.

The Show / Re: Oppinion: spanking children
« on: October 25, 2009, 04:02:56 AM »
I have this to say on spanking:

The ones who never spank are either saints, or they don't have children.

Or, they are just not psychos who use violence against their kids.
Do you consider giving shots and drawing blood from a kid as violence?

I'm pretty sure sticking sharp metal objects into a person is considered initiation of force.

Please tell me you didn't just equate providing medical treatment and hitting children!
Hitting children! I guess it's more fun than trying to be violent against someone who can actually defend themselves. Is this something one can talk about openly in the US? "Hey, I just kicked my kids ass, I'm such a great fucking parent with my medieval parenting techniques  based on using violence against my own kids".

The Show / Re: Oppinion: spanking children
« on: October 23, 2009, 09:49:04 AM »
I have this to say on spanking:

The ones who never spank are either saints, or they don't have children.

Or, they are just not psychos who use violence against their kids.

Whut? If you hit your own kids you're a damn psycho. How the fuck can a sane person hit his or her own kids?

The Show / Re: Oppinion: spanking children
« on: October 23, 2009, 07:58:36 AM »
I have this to say on spanking:

The ones who never spank are either saints, or they don't have children.

Or, they are just not psychos who use violence against their kids.

General / Re: One third of doctors do not want swine flu vaccination
« on: October 03, 2009, 04:36:04 AM »
obviously you ain't gonna live in no plastic bubble but you can consider the things you ingest or do to your own body and figure out what you are or aren't comfortable with doing. It's always worth considering. How would the free market react if people were opting for healthier products?

People just don't seem to be aware of how much mercury is in the environment.  It isn't a conspiracy.  It is a bunch of different manufactures looking for the cheapest way to preserve their products so they can be competitive in the market place.   All an individual consumer can do is search for ways to minimize their own personal exposure.  This goes doubly for a pregnant woman or a woman looking to get pregnant.   

There are many things which can limit your exposure.  I doubt anyone could totally avoid mercury.  I would think Libertarians understand that it is an issue of personal responsibility. 

Don't live in a home next to a hwy.  And try to not get caught in heavy traffic as much as possible.
If you have dental amalgams and can't get them removed consider getting a grindguard for sleeping and avoid whitening toothpaste and products.  Also if you are an ice cruncher stop it. 
Don't eat fish choose flax oil or hemp oil for omega 3 source
Purchase organic fruits and veg
Don't handle broken florescent bulbs (that is what men are for.) 
Get spring water for drinking, least contaminated.  Scientist are working on ways to eliminate mercury from water supplies http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090517143341.htm Currently there is no economical home water filtration which will eliminate mercury. 
Select products which don't have mercury listed as an ingredient opt for the non-mercury version or substitute.  Usually there is another choice available. 
Batteries get non-mercury ones.  Manufactures have voluntarily started removing mercury.  They hope all batteries will be mercury free by 2011. 
Don't take or inject medical products to include some vaccines which contain Thimerosal especially if you are pregnant. 

The alternative is to have Government handle it, like they did with lead and ddt pollution, by banning the use of mercury in most products if not all products.   

Either this, or one might choose to go on with ones life eating delish sushi celebrating the fact that the average lifespan in increasing because of things like modern agricultural technolofy, and vaccines and other medical developments.

General / Re: One third of doctors do not want swine flu vaccination
« on: October 01, 2009, 10:44:50 AM »
And BTW:

My son got his first vaccinations on Monday, the evil autism fairy has not yet come by.

And no, I will not take the swine flu vaccine. It's not dangerous, but it's not necessary. It's the damn flu.

Why not don't you want him to be protected?  Doesn't your son need a dose of thimerosal.  Won't you be so angry if he catches the flu and dies.  You must run out and get him that vaccine right now.  The fact that you are not getting him this vaccine proves you don't believe what you write.  You do not see the vaccine as safe.   And any bullshit argument about it is just the flu is just that bullshit.  If you thought that the vaccine was safe you would get your son vaccinated. 

I know that what's real and what's not does not matter too much to kooks like you, but I'll answer you anyway for the benefit of other people reading this.

I would not be able to have my kid vaccinated if I had wanted to, because the vaccine is not given to infants younger than six months. The reason for that is that they are more at risk of flu complications, and flu vaccines actually cause the flu or flulike symptoms in some cases. It has nothing to do with thiomersal, autism or any other kooky conspiracy theories.

General / Re: Is a free-economy perfect?
« on: October 01, 2009, 07:56:33 AM »
If we were without government or any other means of coercive interference in the market, what would we have?

We would have far more prosperity, development and progress.

But would it be perfect?

Another way to ask this question is: Are all the problems/deficiencies in the current un-free economy due solely to government/coercive intervention?

Yes, the problem of government force is due solely to government force. Getting along with others on a voluntary basis, without utilizing force is perfect.

General / Re: One third of doctors do not want swine flu vaccination
« on: October 01, 2009, 07:30:31 AM »
And BTW:

My son got his first vaccinations on Monday, the evil autism fairy has not yet come by.

And no, I will not take the swine flu vaccine. It's not dangerous, but it's not necessary. It's the damn flu.

General / Re: One third of doctors do not want swine flu vaccination
« on: October 01, 2009, 07:28:15 AM »
There's two different questions here that should not be mixed:

1. Whether it is OK for gooberment to force medical treatments, preventative or reactive, on people.

2. Whether your paranoid conspiracy bullshit crap ass idiot ideas about evil vaccines are true.

The answers are:

1. No.

2. No!

General / Re: Pictures of Your Pets!
« on: October 01, 2009, 05:22:47 AM »

Here's my pug Gonzo trying to eat my three months old Willum :D

General / Re: Last movie you've watched
« on: September 19, 2009, 12:41:35 PM »
District 9! Excellent South African scifi.

General / Re: Statistical Confusion
« on: September 19, 2009, 12:01:39 PM »
The kids are outnumbered, but they arent loud and angry. Thats bizarre. If I were told to support other peoples parents because they screwed up their finances, and legally there was nothing I could do about it, I would at least get angry. Maybe even take to the streets in protest.

Why would the kids, who are promised sweet, sweet, welfare benefits by the state, take to the streets?

General / Re: Vaccine Nation directors cut
« on: September 19, 2009, 11:59:05 AM »
Ok, tell me about interests. I became a father three months ago, and my son will be vaccinated. Now, what the fuck is there to gain for the evil Vampire NWO Big Pharma Bilderbergers from turning my Willum into an autist?

That isn't the point at all.  They (big pharma and their stockholders) stand to lose massive amounts of money if you and other parents don't vaccinate or simple vaccinate on an alternative schedule.  Their profits won't be as high if they don't have vaccine mandates.  They stand to lose money if vaccine damages can be proven in court from the injured parties.  

Let's see... They stand to lose money if vaccine damages are proven, and yet they CONTINUE to manufacture the same vaccines with the same components that causes autism. By that they put themselves at even greater risk of losing even more money. Now why the hell would they do that? Why the hell would their big, fat lawyers not tell them how incredibly stupid that would be? This makes no sense!
I made no mention of NWO or Bilderbergers or any such thing.  That is a strawman argument completely.  I don't know where you came up with that shit it isn't in the movie either.  These people aren't setting out to injure kids but at the same time they justify their profits with what they will call justifiable risk.  So if 1% of kids or 1 in 150 or so children already has a toxic load or illness or genetic predisposition or prematurity to which a vaccine toxin pushes them over the edge into autism it is worth the preconceived benefit or the greater good.  

Ok, we've got Big Pharma by the balls. These greedy bastards think of my lil'un developing autism as a justifiable risk. Now, let's take a look at who else would have to be in on this conspiracy. Every god damn person able to read a fucking researh paper in the entire western world! Every god damn government, every god damn pediatrition, every god damn research scientist, every god damn health care professional! Both in the public and the private sector! Thousands upon thousands of people, PARENTS, would have to be in on it! Yet, there's a STRONG consensus that the autism claims are nothing but bullshit. This is why I bring in NWO, Bilderbergers and so on, because this is NOTHING but kookery all the way through! This is a practically religious belief in an all-mighty power that can control everyone and everything!

Are you anti-vaccine Lord Marius?   Cause you are already off the vaccine schedule if your child hasn't been vaccinated with HepB according the CDC.   That vaccine is suppose to be done within the first 24 hours of life no mater what the child's body weight or prematurity.  

Here in Norway the schedule starts at 3 months with HiB, DTaP and polio.

I remember distinctly when my son was born.  He pulled out his neonatal blackberry and checked his calendar.  First order of business birth, second day of life become a gay prostitute so as to pay for tattoos and a preplanned intravenous drug addiction by the third day of life.  Oh thank-god the doctor's injected his 5.5 ounce little body with HepB so as to avert a global catastrophe as he ran am-muck infecting the world with his diabolical plans. (Are you certain you haven't been watching too much Family Guy?)  HepB is a blood born illness meaning infants are not at risk unless the mother tests positive for HepB.  I didn't receive the HepB vaccine until I was and adult and I tested negative for HepB prior to giving birth.  His prematurity and my negative HepB status should have counter indicated giving him that vaccine.  Because his risk of contracting HepB was so minuscule it wasn't worth any risk even a 1% risk to vaccinate him on his first day of life.  Point of information I had no plans to hire a gay prostitute pedophile nanny who was an amateur tattoo artist either.

Yeah, I bet it looks damn scary when your newborn is innoculated. But a lot of stuff that looks dangerous to the layperson isn't really any dangerous at all.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 31 queries.