Welcome to the Free Talk Live bulletin board system!
This board is closed to new users and new posts.  Thank you to all our great mods and users over the years.  Details here.
185859 Posts in 9829 Topics by 1371 Members
Latest Member: cjt26
Home Help
+  The Free Talk Live BBS
|-+  Profile of atomiccat
| |-+  Show Posts
| | |-+  Topics

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - atomiccat

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
General / Guy uses sovereignty stuff on cops
« on: August 01, 2011, 07:49:10 AM »

General / What was the last thing you purchased
« on: May 11, 2011, 03:24:56 AM »
Just post the last thing you purchased or if you want to talk about something you bought recently post that.

I bought a moose knuckle dog bog for my dog and a pig ear thing. he doesn't seem to like raw hides so hopefully he likes the bone.

General / Happy 4/20/11
« on: April 20, 2011, 10:35:31 PM »
 smoke any good stuff today?

The Polling Pit / What did you buy for black friday/cyber monday?
« on: November 29, 2010, 02:21:12 AM »
I woke up at 3 am, went to JC penny got some towels and a leather jacket and the free snow globes they give out here,
then I went to Fred myers for the 20% off all video games and accesories and bought kinect sports and 40$ in xbox points.
then I went to target but all the good stuff was taken and it was a 45 min wait to checkout anything so i left.
and went to shopko, got my girlfriend a electric razor, and a clock radio that plays and charges her ipod, and I got a projector for 60$ and So i could hook it up to my xbox and play games on my wall.

General / North Korea fires artillery into South Korea
« on: November 23, 2010, 03:33:47 AM »

South Korea says it has returned fire after North Korea fired around 200 artillery shells onto one of its border islands, reportedly killing one marine.

The South's military was placed on its highest non-wartime alert after the shells landed on Yeonpyeong island.

North Korea has not yet commented on the incident, in which three marines and two civilians were also injured.

Correspondents say this is one of the most serious since the Korean War ended without a peace treaty in 1953.

There have been occasional cross-border clashes since, but the latest incident comes at a time of rising regional tension.

North Korea's reclusive leader Kim Jong-il is believed to be ill and trying to engineer the succession of his youngest son. And on Saturday, North Korea showed off what it claimed was a new uranium enrichment facility - potentially giving it a second route to a nuclear weapon.

The move prompted the US special representative for North Korea, Stephen Bosworth, to rule out the resumption of six-party talks on resolving the nuclear issue.

South Korean presidential spokesman Kim Hee-jung also said it was investigating a possible link between the artillery attack and recent maritime exercises near the western sea border earlier on Tuesday.
'Illegal firing'

South Korean officials said artillery rounds began landing on Yeonpyeong island, near the disputed inter-Korean maritime border about 100km (60 miles) west of the Korean Peninsula.

"A North Korean artillery unit staged an illegal firing provocation at 1434 (0534 GMT) and South Korean troops fired back immediately in self-defence," the defence ministry said.

A resident on the island, where between 1,200 and 1,300 people live, told the AFP news agency that dozens of houses were damaged, while television pictures showed plumes of smoke rising above the island.

"Houses and mountains are on fire and people are evacuating. You can't see very well because of plumes of smoke," a witness on the island told YTN television station. "People are frightened to death."

The military said one marine was killed and three others were injured, according to South Korea's YTN television. Two civilians were also hurt.

The South Korean military has fired 80 artillery shells in response and also deployed fighter jets to Yeonpyeong.

However, President Lee Myung-bak urged officials attending an emergency cabinet meeting to try to prevent any further escalation.

A spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry said that both countries should "do more to contribute to peace".

"What's imperative now is to restart six-party talks as soon as possible," Hong Lei told a news conference in Beijing.

The impact has already been felt on financial markets, with both the Korean won and the Japanese yen falling in value.

This western maritime border, also known as the Northern Limit Line, has been the scene of numerous clashes in the past.

In March, a South Korean warship went down near the border with the loss of 46 lives. International investigators say a North Korean torpedo sank the ship, although Pyongyang has denied any role in the incident.

Since then relations between the two neighbours have remained tense.

General / Funny John Dennis campaign ad
« on: September 13, 2010, 03:33:40 PM »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7jJI1cfEgc  :lol:


General / What are your fetishes
« on: June 23, 2010, 03:05:44 AM »
Going off the last Sunday show with dale, what are your fetishes or what weird sexual things have you done.

and starting off I have peed on my GF, I did it in the shower and she got mad :D .  though its not a fetish.

General / Two Dumb Christian Girls Trying to convert a Hindu Girl
« on: May 05, 2010, 03:21:37 AM »


General / Thank you satan!
« on: January 19, 2010, 03:39:36 PM »
Barack obama's "Yes we can" = Thank you satan.

Here is the video


Youtube insert seems not to be working so I added link above

General / Truckers Delight vid (NSFW)
« on: December 20, 2009, 02:24:06 PM »

General / Burns cured for free over the phone! As heard on FTL!
« on: December 16, 2009, 04:41:21 PM »

Anyone Care to burn them selves and call the fire burn doctor?

General / h1n1 vaccine recall
« on: December 16, 2009, 04:38:28 PM »
Non-safety recall, on that some of the vaccines has very little of the Anti-gen in it... so they are basically worthless, if they weren't already

This is an official
CDC Health Update

Distributed via Health Alert Network
December 15, 2009, 10:04 EST (10:04 AM EST)

  Non-Safety Related Voluntary Recall of Certain Lots of Sanofi Pasteur H1N1 Pediatric (0.25 mL, for 6-35 month olds) Vaccine in Pre-Filled Syringes

As part of its quality assurance program, Sanofi Pasteur, Inc., performs additional routine, ongoing testing of influenza vaccines after the vaccine has been distributed to health care providers to ensure that vaccines continue to meet required specifications. In recent testing of the amount of antigen in its influenza A (H1N1) monovalent vaccine, Sanofi Pasteur found four distributed lots of single-dose, pre-filled syringe pediatric (0.25 mL.) vaccine with antigen content lower than required potency levels. The manufacturer is conducting a non-safety related voluntary recall of these affected lots of vaccine.

After performing these tests, Sanofi Pasteur notified the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that the antigen content in one lot of pediatric syringes that had been distributed to providers was later found to have dropped below a pre-specified limit. As a result of this finding, Sanofi Pasteur tested additional lots and found that three other lots that had been distributed also had an antigen content that had fallen below pre-specified limits. This means that doses from these four vaccine lots no longer meet the specifications for antigen content. 

While the antigen content of these lots is now below the specification limit for the product, CDC and FDA are in agreement that the small decrease in antigen content is unlikely to result in a clinically significant reduction in immune response among persons who have received the vaccine. For this reason, there is no need to revaccinate persons who have received vaccine from these lots.

Providers are being asked to return any vaccine to the manufacturer in the following lots that remains unused to the manufacturer:

    * 0.25 mL pre-filled syringes, 10-packs (NDC # 49281-650-25, sometimes coded as 49281-0650-25):


    * 0.25 mL pre-filled syringes, 25-packs (NDC # 49281-650-70, sometimes coded as 49281-0650-70):


These lots were shipped in November and are intended for children 6 months through 35 months of age. Sanofi Pasteur will send directions for returning unused vaccine from these lots to providers.

All vaccines are thoroughly tested prior to release and shipping to determine that they meet all manufacturer and FDA standards for purity, potency and safety. The affected vaccine met all specifications at the time of release. CDC and FDA have determined that there are no safety concerns for children who have received this vaccine. Sanofi Pasteur has discontinued distribution of the 0.25 mL syringes of H1N1 pediatric vaccines.

The drop in antigen content below the required specification that is described here is specific to Sanofi Pasteur’s pediatric H1N1 monovalent vaccine in 0.25 mL pre-filled syringes. The same vaccine packaged in other forms, such as 0.5 mL pre-filled syringes for older children and adults and multi-dose vials, continue to meet specifications.

The antigen content in the affected lots of vaccine is only slightly below the specification limit. The slightly reduced concentration of vaccine antigen found in retesting these lots is still expected to be effective in stimulating a protective response. There is no need to re-administer a dose to those who received vaccine from these lots. However, as is recommended for all 2009 H1N1 vaccines, all children less than 10 years old should get the recommended two doses of H1N1 vaccine approximately a month apart for the optimal immune response. So, children less than 10 years old who have only received one dose of vaccine thus far should still receive a second dose of 2009 H1N1 vaccine.

For children 6 months of age and older, vaccine is available in multidose vials. The vaccine in multidose vials is safe and effective vaccine for children. One difference between vaccine in pre-filled syringes and the multidose vials is that the multidose vials contain a preservative (thimerosal) to prevent potential contamination after the vial is opened. The standard dose for this preparation for administration to infants 6-35 months old is the same as for the pre-filled syringes, 0.25 mL. For healthy children at least 2 years of age, the nasal spray (live, attenuated influenza vaccine) is also an option.  The nasal spray vaccine is produced in single units that do not contain thimerosal.   

For More Information:

    * For Questions and Answers related to the withdrawn vaccine see http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/syringes_qa.htm
    * Call CDC’s toll-free information line, 800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348, which is available 24 hours a day, every day.


Categories of Health Alert messages:
Health Alert        conveys the highest level of importance; warrants immediate action or attention.
Health Advisory provides important information for a specific incident or situation; may not require immediate action.
Health Update    provides updated information regarding an incident or situation; unlikely to require immediate action.

##This Message was distributed to State and Local Health Officers, Public Information Officers, Epidemiologists and HAN Coordinators as well as Clinician organizations##


You have received this message based upon the information contained within our emergency notification data base. If you have a different or additional e-mail or fax address that you would like us to use please contact your State-based Health Alert Network program at your State or local health department.


The CDC and HHS logos are the exclusive property of the Department of Health and Human Services and may not be used for any purpose without prior express written permission. Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Links to non-Federal organizations are provided solely as a service to our users. Links do not constitute an endorsement of any organization by CDC or the Federal Government, and none should be inferred. The CDC is not responsible for the content of the individual organizations.

Please send us your feedback or comments: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/coca/feedback.htm.

Our Clinician Communication Team is committed to excellence in reporting our weekly updates.  Please e-mail coca@cdc.gov should you note any written errors or discrepancies.

If you need to unsubscribe or update your information, please go to our website: http://www.bt.cdc.gov/clinregistry.

If you need further information or technical help, please send an e-mail message to: coca@cdc.gov.

General / Cute kitten :D
« on: November 28, 2009, 10:36:15 PM »

General / U.N. Wants to kill people to fight climate change
« on: November 24, 2009, 03:45:34 AM »

Sounds like they want to sacrifice people to their evil gods to make sure the weather stays the same


The United Nations Population Fund has released its annual State of the World Population Report entitled "Facing a Changing World: Women, Population and Climate".  This report goes farther than any U.N. report before it by unequivocally linking population growth with climate change, and it suggests that the only way to avoid climate "disaster" is to increase "family planning" services around the world, reduce fertility rates and encourage families around the world to have less children.  As if to underline this point, in a statement accompanying the release of this new report, UNFPA Executive Director Thoraya Obaid stated that "rapid population growth and industrialization have led to a rapid rise in greenhouse gas emissions. We have now reached a point where humanity is approaching the brink of disaster."

The brink of disaster?

Doesn't that seem just a little bit alarmist?

Well, the truth is that environmental extremists have resorted to increasingly strong language in an attempt to whip up the fear of climate change.

Unfortunately, humans are not even causing climate change.  If you do not know this, then we recommend that you read the comprehensive article that we posted about this on our sister site entitled "How To Save The Environment? Get Al Gore The Heck Away From It".

But even if humans were causing "climate change" (which they most certainly are not), there is still no justification for trying to reduce the population in order to fight it.

But apparently the authors of this new U.N. report are convinced otherwise.  The authors of the report were very clear about how they feel about the link between population growth and climate change....

"The importance of the speed and magnitude of recent population growth in boosting future greenhouse-gas emissions is well recognized among scientists, including the authors of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's reports."

In fact, the authors believe that population growth has been responsible for approximately half of the growth of carbon emissions....

"Still, calculations of the contribution of population growth to emissions growth globally produce a consistent finding that most of past population growth has been responsible for between 40 per cent and 60 per cent of emissions growth."

So according to the authors of the report, it is the growth in the human population that has brought us to the very brink of a planetary disaster....

"The harsh realities of high per capita emissions among industrialized countries and swiftly rising ones among developing countries highlight the urgency of mobilizing all of humanity to stop collectively at the brink of this possible climate disaster zone."

So what is the very best way to reduce climate change?  According to the authors of the report, each future person that can be eliminated can have a huge impact on reducing carbon emissions.....

"Each birth results not only in the emissions attributable to that person in his or her lifetime, but also the emissions of all his or her descendents. Hence, the emissions savings from intended or planned births multiply with time."

But the authors of the report also recognize that the idea of "population control" is very unpopular in many areas - but that also it is time to seriously address it as part of the climate change debate....

"fear of appearing supportive of population control has until recently held back any mention of 'population' in the climate debate. Nonetheless, some participants in the debate are tentatively suggesting the need at least consider the impacts of population growth."

So if "climate change" is the problem, who is the enemy?

Well, it turns out that humanity is the enemy.

The report is very clear that no human can ever be "carbon neutral"....

"No human is genuinely "carbon neutral," especially when all greenhouse gases are figured into the equation. Therefore, everyone is part of the problem, so everyone must be part of the solution in some way."

Everyone is part of the problem?

So that means that the authors of the report are saying that you and I and are families are part of the problem.

The fact that we exist is part of the problem to them.

So what is the solution according to the authors?....

"Strong family planning programmes are in the interests of all countries for greenhouse-gas concerns as well as for broader welfare concerns."

In other words, we need to pass out more condoms, encourage more women to get abortions and tell more women they need to focus on their careers instead of their families so that we can get them to have less children.

You see, the term "family planning services" is just code in the report for things like "lower fertility rates" and "smaller families"....

"family planning services and supplies are especially powerful in delaying the age of first pregnancies and reducing the size of completed families"

The truth is that the report uses a lot of thinly veiled, politically correct language to suggest that in order to fight climate change, radical population control measures should be implemented.

For example, the report specifically mentions Barack Obama's top science czar, John P. Holdren, and his belief that population growth is driving consumption growth....

In 1991, physicist John P. Holdren, now chief science advisor to U.S. President Barack Obama, noted that "changes in settlement patterns necessitated by population growth result in more transport, per person, of resources, goods, and people," making a case that population growth directly stimulates consumption growth.

So what does John P. Holdren believe about population control?  Well, the truth is that he once co-authored a textbook entitled "Ecoscience" in which he advocated population control measures that are so extreme that it is hard to believe that a sane man authored them.  The following are real quotes from Holdren's textbook.....

Pages 787 and 788....

“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would haveto meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.”

Pages 786 and 787....

“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

Page 838....

“In today’s world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?”

Are you starting to get the picture?

Keep in mind that John P. Holdren is the number one science advisor in Barack Obama's administration.

This is the kind of stuff that the guy actually believes, and he is not being forced to resign.

The truth is that the Obama administration is fully behind the population control agenda.

Back in March, the Obama administration reversed the Bush administration's policy and directed that 50 million dollars be given to the United Nations Population Fund - the authors of the report discussed above.

So not only is the United Nations Population Fund promoting their populaton control agenda around the world, they are also using your tax dollars to do it.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 29 queries.