Welcome to the Free Talk Live bulletin board system!
This board is closed to new users and new posts.  Thank you to all our great mods and users over the years.  Details here.
185859 Posts in 9829 Topics by 1371 Members
Latest Member: cjt26
Home Help
+  The Free Talk Live BBS
|-+  Profile of sectiverdian
| |-+  Show Posts
| | |-+  Topics

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - sectiverdian

Pages: [1]
General / The Uniform Commercial Code and the Common Law
« on: May 29, 2012, 04:18:53 AM »
Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government.
--Congressman James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio)

The causes of this fraudulent bankruptcy can be dealt with in another post, but for now, we will discuss the ramifications of it and a way to escape the oppression thereof.

Via the Emergency Banking Act(March 9, 1933) and the Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause(June 5, 1933), the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments was dissolved. The Uniform Commercial Code is the method chosen to collect the value of the bankrupt entity.

The Uniform Commercial Code recognizes Common Law. If it completely abolished the Common Law, the creditors would be forced to allow congress to admit the bankruptcy of the United States and to admit that it is owned in its entirety by its creditors. However, to preserve the status quo and keep the gravy train rolling with the U.S. Citizens toiling away as usual, the creditors refuse to allow this fact to be released through the main propaganda system. The Uniform Commercial Code was written so that it would not abolish Common Law entirely. If Common Law rights have been reserved in a sufficient, timely, and explicit manner as provided for in Article 1, Section 207 of the Code, a defendant may insist that all statutes be construed harmoniously with Common Law.

If an arresting citizen(cop) is ignorant of Common Law and proceeds with an accusation without recognizing that Common Law rights have been reserved, and if a judge insists on proceeding to process the case,  The following question should be posed:

"Your Honor, has this court made a legal determination that Article 1, Section 207 and Article 1, Section 103 of the Uniform Commercial Code are not valid law before this court?"

At this point, the judge has a dilemna. A court would not disregard one section of the Code and uphold the remainder. However, if the answer is in the affirmative, the following statement should be made:

"Your Honor, on and for the record, I put this court on notice that I am appealing your legal determination."

The appeals court will uphold the Code, and the judge is aware of this. At this point, the judge's dilemna is evident once again, and he must halt the procession of the case or allow the appeals court to overturn his determination.

Pages: [1]

Page created in 0.013 seconds with 29 queries.