Welcome to the Free Talk Live bulletin board system!
This board is closed to new users and new posts.  Thank you to all our great mods and users over the years.  Details here.
185859 Posts in 9829 Topics by 1371 Members
Latest Member: cjt26
Home Help
+  The Free Talk Live BBS
|-+  Profile of Temper
| |-+  Show Posts
| | |-+  Messages

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Temper

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8
1
The Polling Pit / Re: Demographics - Smoking?
« on: February 11, 2015, 06:59:47 PM »
What type of smoking is the poll about?

2
General / Re: WWJD?
« on: February 24, 2014, 02:14:36 AM »
haha it took me forever to figure out what you were saying..


Pretty sure Jesus wouldn't do anything because last I heard he is DEAD and hasn't been resurrected yet.

Plus when he is resurrected he will run around saying he is talking to god and the Psychiatrists will drug him into a drooling bed ridden [not sure what to even call it..]

3
General / Re: You're eating poo
« on: February 24, 2014, 02:11:35 AM »
http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/02/21/baby_poop_sausage_probiotics_from_human_feces_aren_t_as_gross_as_they_sound.html

Oh WTF. We have so much food in the western world we throw TONS of it away everyday and people are making SHIT SAUSAGES?!

SERIOUSLY.

4
General / Re: Excellent Butts desegregated version 2.0
« on: February 24, 2014, 02:08:58 AM »
Why you should let me touch your butt. Click.


Umm.. pass. Plus I know you don't like extra sized asses like mine..

5
General / Re: The Most Non-Liberty Oriented Position I Hold
« on: February 03, 2014, 11:04:23 PM »
Like imagine for a second god arrived, he is the biggest fag (no offense i mean flamboyant gay) ever.. Is that the god in the Bible that the Bible beaters are talking about with the homosexuality is a sin shit? Or do you conclude their god never existed?

That's why if anyone wants to start having a discussion about the existence of "God", I say the first thing we have to do is establish exactly what their version is. I find some notions of a god to be less absurd than others.

You missed the point. The case is, whatever they have in their mind isn't want is to their thing doesn't exist!

A broad lack of evidence for the existence of something is evidence for it's nonexistence. Like when they scanned the entire Loch Ness from one side to the other and giant lizards are kind of hard to hide from that, and when you combine that with the lack of any evidence of any scientific substance for decades of people actively looking for it, that's still not 100% conclusive forever and always. But concluding there is no lochness monster* is not a faith-based conclusion. It's an evidence-based conclusion. I don't believe in the lochness monster means I'm fairly confident it doesn't exist due to the complete lack of evidence when a giant creature like that would be rather difficult to hide and there'd probably be substantial evidence by now. If they catch him some day and I can go see him at Sea World, I'll be all "Shit! I was WRAWNG!" and I will change my belief.

*Keeping in mind that the claim is it's based in a specific lake; hence the name. There might be something like it on a planet in another galaxy or something.

Then that would not be the lochness monster.. for the "lochness moster" is defined as lizard thing that lives that that specific lake.. If you find something on another planet, you concluding that it was that just proves that you should not be making determinations of any kind..

6
General / Re: The Most Non-Liberty Oriented Position I Hold
« on: February 03, 2014, 10:58:05 AM »

But I exist and I'm right here. That's a case being made about the state of something that's right here. The existence of me is not the dispute. That might make for a fun thread though.  8)


Yes you exist bit not in the configuration where you are straight. And if there was then it would not be you.

Quote
In the same fashion, you can prove there is no "god" since man is incapable of understanding such a thing (irregardless of it's actual existence or not) so whatever we perceive is the case is actually not.

You're back to arguing about the state of something; not whether it actually exists. That's not a particularly meaningful thing to me. "We can't possibly understand God" is a statement that a lot of believers will agree with you on. It's the justification for saying "It's God's plan" and "God works in mysterious ways". I agree, however, that you could argue that a specific notion of something posited to exist in a specific state might be paradoxical. In that case, you can argue that it's not possible to exist in the state described, and that wouldn't be a scientific argument but rather a logic argument.

My point is if you can't define such a thing then even if later you had all knowledge for everything for all time and wanted to say "see there was/wasn't a god." You couldn't because what you didn't understand changes the nature of the thing. Ultimately, you are saying that anything close enough would be confirmation. So the star trek movie where they get stuck on a planet with "a god" wanting the ship to get out.. Is that god? Would you then point to that thing and proclaim it was what you were taking about? Or would you be a fool like Spock's brother?

Like imagine for a second god arrived, he is the biggest fag (no offense i mean flamboyant gay) ever.. Is that the god in the Bible that the Bible beaters are talking about with the homosexuality is a sin shit? Or do you conclude their god never existed?

7
General / Re: The Most Non-Liberty Oriented Position I Hold
« on: February 03, 2014, 01:26:55 AM »
Of course, because you can't prove the nonexistence of anything

I am not so sure of this, I can prove there is not a heterosexual version of Dalebert. For there can be only one Dalebert, and he is self proclaimed homosexual.

In the same fashion, you can prove there is no "god" since man is incapable of understanding such a thing (irregardless of it's actual existence or not) so whatever we perceive is the case is actually not.

In other words, our interpretation of such a thing will not cover the actual concept.

Like it is funny that god is usually portrayed as a man..

8
General / Re: Excellent Butts desegregated version 2.0
« on: February 03, 2014, 12:59:03 AM »
Do you want to get lost in there?

YES!

9
General / Re: Excellent Butts desegregated version 2.0
« on: February 02, 2014, 06:48:34 PM »
*ahem* From the very first post of this thread...

Butts of a clearly less than excellent nature subject to deletion by OP.

You'll just have to start a new thread for less than excellent butts. That can be your fap thread. I'm not one to judge whatever you're into.

Now you are just being buttist.. Well you never defined the qualities of an excellent butt..

I figured with gay guys it was like penises, the bigger the better.. You know "size matters".. kind of thing..

10
General / Re: Excellent Butts desegregated version 2.0
« on: February 01, 2014, 11:27:32 PM »
I have so been CENSORED..

Going to cry foul now Dalebert..

!!

11
General / Re: I hereby offer my letter of resignation
« on: January 31, 2014, 07:32:44 PM »
... but the fact that it's advertised as a "BBS" means that anything aged on the site is acceptably "retro", and actually kinda cool. See?

Umm.. a BBS was very progressive in it's day.. I knew people who ran them - they changed the code and scripting almost constantly..

And Retro is cool as long as it is usable.. if Dalebert quit because the software sucks that's not cool..

12
General / Re: I found out where Richard III went after leaving the BBS
« on: January 31, 2014, 07:30:14 PM »
Wait, you still use email filters?!
Okay, I'll bite.
Why would someone not use email filters? Are they like so 2010 now? What is technocooler than email filters?

I have a spam button now.. I guess it is just a filter in some way.. but it is way easier to use..

13
General / Re: I found out where Richard III went after leaving the BBS
« on: January 30, 2014, 07:08:57 PM »
You just couldn't let me have my little fantasy, could you?

Of course not, you said no lube..

Now any gay guy should know you don't ever want to do that..

14
General / Re: I found out where Richard III went after leaving the BBS
« on: January 30, 2014, 06:14:21 PM »
And he whined to me to unban him... on my website... which is completely inappropriate. For all of you who want to whine to me, I would like to state for the record that I don't give a shit if you get banned, unfairly or otherwise. Filters on email are easy to create so that future attempts to contact me that way will just go str8 to the trash.

Wait, you still use email filters?!

I'm not going to be a moderator much longer. It's probably a good thing that I don't want this role. If you think Brasky is abusive with a ban hammer, I would gleefully shove the ban hammer up your ass and spin it without lube. Then I would drink your pain-induced tears. They give me strength.

HAHAH you are funny when you talk dirty.. you do know the ban hammer is metaphoric right?

15
General / Re: STOP FREE KEENE
« on: January 30, 2014, 06:10:16 PM »
These people are costing ALL of us money. They moved to Keene with the intent to infiltrate any local elected office they can, with the intent of blocking progress, disrupting city function and finance, eliminate the tax code, depend on volunteers for key positions, clog the courts by committing intentional violations so they can argue their cause before a judge, destabilize law enforcement as well as other city services, and repeal or eliminate the city charter to eliminate the mayor’s office."

I mean what about this upsets you? Take a bow..

I mean besides the loaded and ridiculous terminology that acts like only some people are eligible for "legitimate" holding of local office where is the problem?

That is EXACTLY what you aim to do and are being so effective at it they are scared.. SO TAKE A FREEKIN BOW ALREADY.. lool

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 31 queries.