Where do you go. Please don't say New Hampshire.
The problem with NH is that you cannot possibly LIVE like you're free because of the way the base of government is set up. Even if you successfully control a town government and stop enforcing victimless crime laws at the local level and abate propety taxes, there's still the State cops.
I think in 10 years the ones that have moved will have pretty much given up. Maybe they'll be smart enough to get together to take over the government of a low population western US county. Which is about the only chance of freedom we have in this country. To have Anarchy, we must have Minarchy...
Are there a lot of State Cops in NH? In CA the only state police anyone sees are the Highway Patrol, and they only pull people over on the freeways.
State Police usually show up for the big events like murder, and policing state highways because they have legitimate jurisdiction there. Stuff on city and town level are handled by locals, and in some cases Sheriff departments like in LA County share jurisdiction with City, like the LAPD. Staties don't involve themselves in an area with structured law enforcement unless requested. California is an oddball in the traditional state police design, their purpose (according to Wiki) was to provide security for state dignitaries and do some law enforcement in unincorporated areas, and eventually merged with the CHP. Together they still only have 500 officers.
Comparatively, PA has 4500 troopers, and get very involved with small-town situations, again like murder and other stuff that needs more professional forensics support where the locals can't handle the technicalities.
NH only has about 300 troopers, but has some rules about where it patrols - mostly small towns that don't have much of a police force, and they do highway patrol stuff.
Each state agency has its own history and structure, but can always be counted on to be more professional and elite, and their training and tactics are far superior to the normal locals. The size doesn't matter much because they always have special-purpose ad-hoc units that will organize in special situations and will sometimes use Federal Marshals in taskforces if warranted, which can get pretty serious in short order.
Often when there are wide discrepancies in these numbers, there are other agencies that perform the duties and balance out the numbers. Like sheriffs agencies and their deputy sheriffs. In Pennsylvania, sheriffs deputies don't really patrol. You almost never see a sheriffs car, unless they're serving a warrant or escorting prison inmates. In states with less State Troopers, sheriffs have more prevalence. Here, the sheriffs are almost symbolic and the deputies are nearly a joke, mostly working the courthouses like goons. In NH, it says the High Sheriff is the top law enforcement position in the state, and each county has one, so it seems the sheriffs and deputies take the place of traditional state police functions. California seems to follow the same structure with county sheriffs and deputies being regional support, rather than state cops- who are more specialized to certain duties and have state-wide jurisdiction.