Topless protest

[Riddler]

but I do walk through the house half-dressed to get to the dryer

PICS, OR IT DIDN'T HAPPEN

[Riddler]

Im in favor of things that make sense. This double standard makes none. Im against the nonsense.

And that dipshit who wrote the thing about evolution proving that breasts should be hidden because they are attractive... That guy failed miserably.

has this motherfucker seen a wet t-shirt contest at a biker party???

things that make you go .....buuuuhhhhhguuuuddddy  *shiver*

"not all breasts are created equal,
that's why they invented silicone"
                                              - Lord H

[Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith)]

There should be a stripper pole at the protest.

They could just use a stop sign.

Ouch.

[HOO-HAA]

I heard about this on the show - I can't believe it's become such a big issue!  

Surely, whether minarchist or anarchist, political or non-political l(L)ibertarian, the basic rule is always the Wiccan-like principle of 'An it harm none, do what ye will.'

If you're not in favour of the 'protest' then don't go. You can even openly say it's a bad idea in your opinion - I can see no problem with any of that.

But, as a true lover of freedom, every single person on this board should proclaim the freedom-based rights of the women and men involved in the demo/ protest/ whatever to go ahead and do it whatever way they please.

Personally, I'd love to turn up to the event wearing a pair of plastic breasts!  

[Terror Australis]

If only megan fox was part of the topless protest you would have 20 000 sign ups overnight....

[Laetitia]

I wish they would just cut to the chase and go straight for the cannibalism protest.

why not topless cannibalism? 2 for 1 protest.

[Terror Australis]

Breasts not bombs 

[Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith)]

Breasts not bombs 

Why not breasts AND F-bombs?

[freeAgent]

I do not understand why people think that women need to keep their shirts on "for the children".  There is absolutely nothing about female breasts that is harmful to children.  Are they forgetting that women use their breasts to feed babies?  It's nothing they haven't seen before.

All of the women I've seen breastfeeding in public do it discretely.

I thought the point of CIV-DIS was to affect political change.  Why is it being used by some to affect change in people's personal sexual and/or religious beliefs?  Of course, people can agitate for whatever they want but I don't see the urgency of protesting women's lack of right to go topless in a public place.

So tell me, is it possible to be "discrete" with your kid when their face is attached to your breast?  Sure, some people feed with bottles/formula, but many babies and even some toddlers breast feed.  They aren't even sexually attracted to the things.  Why do they need to be "protected" from them?

And as others have said, this isn't about tasteful/polite vs. distasteful/impolite.  This is about whether there should be a law against going topless.  Some muslims are offended by women who don't cover up their entire bodies.  Should we also make that a law?