The Free Talk Live BBS

Free Talk Live => General => Topic started by: Alex Libman on August 11, 2010, 12:30:16 AM

Title: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 11, 2010, 12:30:16 AM
I hereby proclaim that faggotry has gone far enough!  It's one thing to leave people alone to suffer the consequences of their actions, but condoning it is completely different and that needs to stop right now!

First of all, the use of the word "gay" is completely inappropriate, and harmful because it totally screws up all English literature written prior to 1970s (most notably Ayn Rand) - there's nothing cheerful about having a hormonal disorder that makes you addicted to emotions associated with the wrong gender!  What homosexuality really is is evolution's way of telling you to EAT SHIT AND DIE, because you subconsciously know you aren't fit to pollute the human gene pool with more fucked up fagcopies or your fagself!  So, from this time forth, all faggots should be referred to as "shit-eating extinction commies".  Agreed?  Agreed.

The next order of business is how the "shit-eating extinction commies" are to be identified, without violating their Natural Rights but still protecting the Rights of people who don't want themselves, their loved ones, and especially their children influenced by shit-eating extinction commies.  A society that fails to quarantine its members who are infected with a rapidly-communicable disease will not survive for long!  This is why I call for all libertarians to support the freedom of shit-eating extinction commies to do as their please, just as long as they tatoo the words "I AM A SHIT-EATING EXTINCTION COMMIE" in big bold red letters on their foreheads.  Those letters should also glow in the dark, be followed up with translations in Spanish, Chinese, Arabic, Russian, and Braille, and come with free sanitary hand-wipes for any blind person who had to touch a shit-eating extinction commie in order to read them.  Any shit-eating extinction commie who fails to property identify him / her / itsself by those means will be considered to be committing an act of aggression against anyone in its proximity who may not know that it is a shit-eating extinction commie.  When using the Internet, all shit-eating extinction commies should be required to append the letters SEEC (for Shit-Eating Extinction Commie, pronounced "sick") to any alias or screen name they use.


NOTE: posts from shit-eating extinction commies trying to hijack this noble thread will be deleted.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Amazing Richard on August 11, 2010, 12:36:15 AM
how did you delete my shit? it's not even in high jack free zone, and it doesn't show that you are amping
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 11, 2010, 01:50:09 AM
Elemenrary, my dear shit-eating extinction commie.  Elementary.

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e0/Dukenukemforever2007.jpg)

Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 11, 2010, 04:17:09 AM
Fuck you Libman, just... fuck you.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 11, 2010, 06:11:23 AM
Save it for The Definitive Jewhate Rant Contest in two weeks.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on August 11, 2010, 06:30:16 AM
Save it for The Definitive Jewhate Rant Contest in two weeks.

"L.L." should win that one pretty easily.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: libertylover on August 11, 2010, 09:29:50 AM
Save it for The Definitive Jewhate Rant Contest in two weeks.

"L.L." should win that one pretty easily.

Typical all you can do is slander me.  ZIONISM IS NOT JUDAISM, and the country of ISRAEL is not JUDAISM.
Judaism is a religion.    I have no problem with Jewish people or their religion.  I have a problem with people who twist a religion to harm others.  And this is true for many religions not specifically Judaism.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: davann on August 11, 2010, 12:45:22 PM
Was Alex recently shot down by a homo?
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: libertylover on August 11, 2010, 01:09:54 PM
Was Alex recently shot down by a homo?

Probably
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 11, 2010, 01:25:52 PM
What a stupid thing to suppose...  As stupid as saying that "Einstein got shot down by a relative before he came up with the Theory of Relativity".  Clearly my art flies light-years above your hollow little heads...

Since when does one need a reason for a faghate thread?!  It is an end in of itself, a triumph of evolutionary innovation, a monument to human dignity and the human capacity to overcome, to conquer, to strive forth to ever-greater glory, never to compromise, never to yield!

Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Rillion on August 11, 2010, 01:28:28 PM
I'm sure listeners to FTL who think "Hey, maybe I'll check out that forum they mentioned" and come here, and see this thread, will feel so at home.  Clearly this is a place that advocates sanity, wisdom, and freedom.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 11, 2010, 01:36:56 PM
Yes, the freedom to hate fags - logically, constructively, and for all the right reasons.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on August 11, 2010, 02:51:46 PM
Save it for The Definitive Jewhate Rant Contest in two weeks.

"L.L." should win that one pretty easily.

Typical all you can do is slander me.  ZIONISM IS NOT JUDAISM, and the country of ISRAEL is not JUDAISM.
Judaism is a religion.    I have no problem with Jewish people or their religion.  I have a problem with people who twist a religion to harm others.  And this is true for many religions not specifically Judaism.
Ok, go defend another holocaust denying website covered in anti-semetic cartoons.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Stoker on August 11, 2010, 02:58:00 PM
Foghat Rant?
[youtube=425,350]
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DiUCE7w0_d4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DiUCE7w0_d4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>[/youtube]
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: libertylover on August 11, 2010, 03:34:50 PM
Was Alex recently shot down by a homo?

Actually, on second thought it did not necessarily have to be recently.  Alex hangs on to grains of sand life hands him until they develop into warped pearls of ranting hatred.  He strings them together in a masturbatory necklace of homophobia.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 11, 2010, 04:38:31 PM
Fucking faggots identify as men, and should be killed like all piggish men.

Lesbians however will conquer the Earth and will be the only people around once superior lesbian geneticists find a way to completely get rid of the Y chromosome in men.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Stoker on August 11, 2010, 05:07:42 PM
Fucking faggots identify as men, and should be killed like all piggish men.

Lesbians however will conquer the Earth and will be the only people around once superior lesbian geneticists find a way to completely get rid of the Y chromosome in men.

Wow.  :shock: And here the OP thought he was being outrageous because he wanted to spew hatred about a measely 5% of the population, and TLV trumps his ass with a rant placing her as a supreme hater of half of humanity! Hell, Nazis only hate around 30% of humanity...

(http://c4.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/19/l_9a662397268d64f37a5b7f63b8bba743.jpg)
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: alaric89 on August 11, 2010, 05:27:59 PM
[youtube=425,350]<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lyl5DlrsU90&amp;hl=nb_NO&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lyl5DlrsU90&amp;hl=nb_NO&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>[/youtube]

Hey this fits in two threads at once.

The gayer video was denied to embedding.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLGbXHc-Ce0&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLGbXHc-Ce0&feature=related)
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 11, 2010, 05:39:29 PM
Fucking faggots identify as men, and should be killed like all piggish men.

Lesbians however will conquer the Earth and will be the only people around once superior lesbian geneticists find a way to completely get rid of the Y chromosome in men.

Wow.  :shock: And here the OP thought he was being outrageous because he wanted to spew hatred about a measely 5% of the population, and TLV trumps his ass with a rant placing her as a supreme hater of half of humanity! Hell, Nazis only hate around 30% of humanity...

(http://c4.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/19/l_9a662397268d64f37a5b7f63b8bba743.jpg)

Only April can out-Libman the Libman.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 11, 2010, 06:21:52 PM
I wonder if ian hates homophobia as much as racism, you better watch out alex  :roll:
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: davann on August 11, 2010, 07:46:08 PM
Fucking faggots identify as men, and should be killed like all piggish men.

Lesbians however will conquer the Earth and will be the only people around once superior lesbian geneticists find a way to completely get rid of the Y chromosome in men.

Thank the lord, I've always wanted to be a lesbian. Watch out world, here comes the biggest lipstick lesbo slut to ever live!
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 11, 2010, 11:42:50 PM
Lesbians however will conquer the Earth  [...]

Bullshit.  Men convinced women that they are their equals only to get inside their vaginas, which is a very noble lie, but a lie nonetheless.  A civilization run entirely by women would not progress beyond the advent of bubble bath and trashy love novels.  Only heterosexual non-socialist men are human beings, everyone else is mentally defective.  Even the smartest woman that ever lived (Ayn Rand, by far) got her best ideas from men, and screwed them up with her womanly need for romanticism and aesthetics.


[...]  he wanted to spew hatred about a measely 5% of the population  [...]

Measly 5%?!  Where did whatever commie "scientists" you're mindlessly quoting get that number, their butts?  Homosexuals range between ~1% and ~99% of the population depending on environmental factors, which is why faghate is so essential to the survival of human civilization.  You take healthy young boys w/o any prior faghate education and put them on an island with no girls, and all of them will learn to enjoy gay sex.  You create a society where being gay means you can enjoy more sex, less nagging, less responsibility, and no guilt, and your population will collapse while the more rightfully-faghating cultures will inherit the world.  Perhaps a thousand years from now no one will remember Michelangelo or Alan Turing, simply because their culture failed to hate fags properly!


I wonder if ian hates homophobia as much as racism, you better watch out alex

Race is a cultural concept assigned at birth, sexuality is a self-cultivated behavior over which people have as high a degree of control as they do over anything else.  No one is born a fag any more than anyone is born a serial killer!  Sure, some people might be more predisposed to murder by circumstances beyond their control, but they must nonetheless be held responsible for the consequences of their actions!

I'm not "homophobic", and I've had a couple homosexual experiences to prove it.  I'm actually probably one of the least homophobic people in the world, which is why I am qualified to talk about this openly and constructively.  What I'm introducing here is a whole new concept of faghate that is based on pure reason.

I believe that even snorting heroin mixed with rat poison from the eye-socket of a dying baby chimp should be legal, but in a rational society people would be culturally discouraged from doing these things, and when it comes out that a person does this a lot of people would choose to ostracize this person.  Homosexuality should be treated the same way.

What does it say about a person when he is addicted to pain in the ass - an organ that was designed to expel shit, and is very fragile and prone to all sorts of infections?  Oral sex is logical from the evolutionary standpoint only if you plan to bite off your partner's testicles when he least expects it, which is what male rabbits and other animals do to each-other all the time.  The life expectancy for fags is lower than anyone brainwashed by politically convenient pro-fag propaganda will ever admit, and their life expectancy would be much lower still without heterosexuals being forced to pay for their vices through higher medical costs, in addition to also having to pull the fags' demographic weight.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: yamnuska on August 11, 2010, 11:51:02 PM
What if I am bi, do I count as a fag? I'm nowhere being a commie either.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 11, 2010, 11:56:38 PM
Everyone is bi.  Faggotry describes behavior, not the person.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 12, 2010, 01:20:17 AM
Everyone is bi.  Faggotry describes behavior, not the person.

Right. Like how you're a total faggot without being a faggot.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 12, 2010, 04:39:01 AM
Yes.  It's like Ron Paul is an OB/GYN without being a woman.  Or an abortionist.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: alaric89 on August 12, 2010, 05:54:39 AM
I enjoy anal sex, Mr. Libman. No bleeding no problems.
Do you honestly believe people choose their sexual orientation? I have been with only men for long periods, I never wanted to fuck a guy. I don't think real queers would suddenly want pussy if they went to a "Sex in The City" film festival for a month either. I don't want to hate gays, they bring a lot to the table for progress. One of the libertarians I most admire is bi. (John Stagliano)
And Dale is my favorite guesthost on FTL.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 12, 2010, 07:16:00 AM
I enjoy anal sex, Mr. Libman. No bleeding no problems.

Bleeding is just one on the very long list of problems, physical as well as psychological, that can be caused by anal sex.  Tissue walls tear.  Sphincters overexert / overstretch / weaken.  Healthy bacteria that are supposed to exist in the anus and lower digestive tract get displaced.  Harmful bacteria that the body is trying to get rid of gets spread around, both inside the body through weakened wall linings and elsewhere.  New microorganisms (and I don't just mean sperm) and hormones are introduced into the body via a means through which immune system is almost completely ineffective to defend against.  Etc, etc, etc.


Do you honestly believe people choose their sexual orientation?

Absolutely.  To deny that is to deny free will entirely.


I have been with only men for long periods, I never wanted to fuck a guy.

Genes do play a role, but not a definitive one.  Individuals are shaped by all of their experiences, including their own thoughts and choices, from the moment they are born.  You never experienced the same environmental factors that others experience.  Anyone can be "straight" or "gay".

I also firmly believe that human beings are not helpless twigs tossed about by the waves of predisposition!  Human beings can change; rebuild themselves, physically as well as mentally!  It isn't easy, but it can be done, even in spite of a culture that will try to destroy people for wanting to change themselves, call them "self-hating faggots" or whatnot...  The most important freedom is the freedom to be rational - everything else is just another form of slavery!


[...]  And Dale is my favorite guesthost on FTL.

Like all of my threads, this thread mixes humor with expression of some very serious and rational ideas.  This is the combination that I find most fulfilling, so I don't dumb my troll arts down to the lowest common denominator.  The reader is expected to know the difference between "faghate", which is obviously a joke, and constructive criticism of "gay" lifestyle / culture.

I have nothing but respect for Dale, and I treat all human beings as individuals.  And I want all of them to be healthy.  And heterosexual.  That doesn't mean all fags must quit cock cold turkey, but they should broaden their horizons beyond their irrational sexual addictions.  Everyone should get hetero-married for the purpose of biological reproduction (polygamy == a-OK), and everyone should raise their children to do the same thing.  A little bit of recreational fagsex won't kill you, but it's like smoking - it's easier to quit if you simply never start!

The human civilization stands at the crossroads between greatness and collapse, with our capacity to think and act rationally being the deciding factor.  The forces of darkness -- governments, religions, eco-nazis, anarcho-commies, and so on -- they feed on our weaknesses!  They want us to be gay, to be destructively hedonistic, incapable of commitment, drifting, shallow, incompetent, lazy, psychologically deformed, infertile!  They don't want to see men become men, and master all the masculine arts that make men capable of providing for and defending their families!  They don't want to see women become women, and master the feminine arts of compassion, healing, love, forming strong family bonds, and birthing / raising many healthy children!  It takes both to provide for the children's psychological needs, which is the basis of all human capacity for self-esteem and will-power, and to educate those children to be capable of rational thought!  Gender roles are an essential part of human survival and prosperity!  When you try to be both you wind up as neither!  When you try to swim against the current of nature you drown!
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Terror Australis on August 12, 2010, 08:08:05 AM
(http://bieniosek.com/gallery/albums/goatse/mr_goatse_wallpaper.sized.jpg)
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: alaric89 on August 12, 2010, 08:52:18 AM
To anybody with a lick of experience Mr. Libman's ass sex theories are stupid, a little like the paranoid "abstinence" church freaks teaching kids these days. People like to discuss sex with me for two reasons, I am honest, I don't talk about shit I haven't tried. I can't discuss S/M because I have neither tried it or want to, but it sure as hell looks nasty and dangerous to me. There is a bunch of extreme sports that I suck at but love to do, if someone doesn't like it they can go fuck themselves.
Can you start labeling your threads JOKE, or TROLL, or something? You and R3 have a strange combination of intelligence, humor, and some silly ideas and it can be hard to tell if you are a dumbass or not.
I love U2
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 12, 2010, 08:59:35 AM
To anybody with a lick of experience Mr. Libman's ass sex theories are stupid, a little like the paranoid "abstinence" church freaks teaching kids these days. People like to discuss sex with me for two reasons, I am honest, I don't talk about shit I haven't tried. I can't discuss S/M because I have neither tried it or want to, but it sure as hell looks nasty and dangerous to me. There is a bunch of extreme sports that I suck at but love to do, if someone doesn't like it they can go fuck themselves.
Can you start labeling your threads JOKE, or TROLL, or something? You and R3 have a strange combination of intelligence, humor, and some silly ideas and it can be hard to tell if you are a dumbass or not.
I love U2

If its Libman, its troll.

R3 is turning around.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: alaric89 on August 12, 2010, 09:02:29 AM
That easy for you to say, you were invited to the party. :lol:
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Terror Australis on August 12, 2010, 09:20:22 AM
It would be bizarre if they were the same person....
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 12, 2010, 09:20:50 AM
It would be bizarre if they were the same person....

Nah, Libman's photos look different thatn the R3 in his videos.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Rillion on August 13, 2010, 07:59:54 PM
To anybody with a lick of experience Mr. Libman's ass sex theories are stupid, a little like the paranoid "abstinence" church freaks teaching kids these days. People like to discuss sex with me for two reasons, I am honest, I don't talk about shit I haven't tried. I can't discuss S/M because I have neither tried it or want to, but it sure as hell looks nasty and dangerous to me. There is a bunch of extreme sports that I suck at but love to do, if someone doesn't like it they can go fuck themselves.
Can you start labeling your threads JOKE, or TROLL, or something? You and R3 have a strange combination of intelligence, humor, and some silly ideas and it can be hard to tell if you are a dumbass or not.
I love U2

I prefer REM.

But yes, it's safe to assume that anything Libman says is trolling, or else it is meant sincerely but is still safe to disregard. 
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 14, 2010, 01:42:23 AM
Every person who uses the word "troll" (except when mocking the concept as I do) is a troll.

Here's a little something you might have missed: the word "trolling" has no meaning whatsoever.  None.  Zilch.  I can call you a troll.  You can call me a troll.  Everyone and no one is a troll.  If we lived in a Monty Python sketch about the dark ages, you might as well have been using the word "witch".  I mock this concept by calling myself a troll, but that doesn't mean jack shit.  All of human civilization is nothing but "trolling", if you want to call it that, or it's "jhdfpwuiodfhing" if you choose to call it jhdfpwuiodfhing instead.

Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: DontTreadOnMike on August 14, 2010, 04:59:57 PM
Oh Jesus. I Libman still around? Make I'll take another few months off from this board.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: DontTreadOnMike on August 14, 2010, 05:01:05 PM
It would be bizarre if they were the same person....

http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=33160.msg594626#msg594626
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 15, 2010, 06:53:19 AM
C'mon!  Stop comparing me to some two-bit one-trick attention whore!  This is a very serious thread!  It addresses a very serious issue!  Faggotry is all around us!  Disguising itself, sneaking into our heads!  Subverting!  Suffocating!  Chiseling away at the last vestiges of normal rational non-extinction-bound heterosexual culture!

I always seem to be the last to figure things out (http://www.google.com/search?q="GAY+OR+NOT,+round"+site:bbs.freetalklive.com)...  Can you imagine going through life not knowing that Neil Patric Harris is gay?!  That makes Harold & Kumar gay by association!  I really enjoyed those movies, but in a way that is now just totally betrayed...  And I literally cried when I found out Chuck Palahniuk (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Palahniuk) was gay!  And Douglas Coupland (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Coupland)!  And Bret Easton Ellis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bret_Easton_Ellis)!  That's pretty much half of good transgressive literature of my generation right there!!!  All things I ever felt while reading those books were completely -- ah, fuck, I don't even know how to finish this sentence -- just totally fucked!  It seems like every day I'm discovering homos jizzed into my head without me knowing it...  Horatio Alger (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horatio_Alger,_Jr.)!  Samuel Barber (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Barber)!  Tchaikovsky (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyotr_Ilyich_Tchaikovsky)!  I feel like I was mind-raped, over and over again, for years, in the worst way possible!

:cry:
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: DontTreadOnMike on August 15, 2010, 11:04:11 AM
C'mon!  Stop comparing me to some two-bit one-trick attention whore!  

Prove that you're not
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 15, 2010, 11:32:08 AM
Me?  One-trick?!  One South Korean graduate student did his Ph.D. dissertation on classifying my posts according to the newly invented Libman Troll Categorization Decimal System!  This one goes into 269.19.6.0.0.2.

Now back to faggots jizzing into my head.  Seriously.  Every piece of dramatic presentation that ever used Samuel Barber's Adagio for Strings (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adagio_for_Strings#Popularity_and_influence) - fucking ruined!  I no longer feel sorry for Elephant Man.  Heck, might as well re-invade 'Nam for all I care - we might have left for all the wrong faggy emotions that've been smuggled into our (sub)consciousness by the vast gay conspiracy in arts, media, entertainment, and who knows what else!

I'm even afraid to sign the Shire Society deceleration thingie - Ian McKellen totally fagged it up already, and if Elijah Wood turns out to be gay I will never think about Tolkien the same way again!
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Amazing Richard on August 15, 2010, 03:58:28 PM
This shows just how bad my gaydar is. I was stunned to find out that Ricky Martin is gay. I may be the only person on the planet that did not question Ricky Martin's sexuality. I actually still don't believe that he is gay. I reckon that Ricky Martin is calling himself gay in order to get attention. Ricky Martin is NOT gay....Ricky Martin is insane.

It's good to be aware that gay activists will list people as "gay", with virtually no evidence to support it. James Dean is often listed as "gay", but the reality is that he swung both ways, and didn't care.

There is a conspiracy going on with gay activists who have a thing against "bi-sexuals". Lots of gays think that "bisexuality" is not real, and so if a dude gets busted with a dick up in his ass, he automatically becomes "gay" in the eyes of the gay activists. And if the dude insists that he is not gay, but likes to swing both ways, then the gay activists will call the dude "confused", and insist that he's gay. This sort of shit that the gays like to pull is quite offensive to the bisexual/pan/fluid/kinky crowd. The bisexual activists are starting to realize that they are getting used by the gays, in order to make the gay agenda stronger.

The "fluid" crowd needs to tell the gays to fuck off and mind their own business, and stop getting involved with gays.
The gays like to say that the fluid crowd is bad for gay and lesbian politics. The gays can also notice that the "bisexual" has no loyalty to the gay agenda, and the gays hate that, too.

Since the "bisexual" is not interested in conforming to a "straight" or "gay" thing, he/she will notice that it's more comfortable to be around a more "fluid" type of crowd.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: dalebert on August 16, 2010, 03:50:14 PM
I am embarrassed to admit that I'm actually finding Libman's trolling entertaining.  It's like admitting you like Monster Truck Sunday Sunday SUNDAY!  It's like Libman is jizzing in my head and I'm a little turned on by it.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 16, 2010, 04:27:34 PM
Glad you can appreciate where I'm coming from.  Now go sham-marry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sham_marriage) a nice Chinese girl who needs an American citizenship to escape Communist oppression and make lots of libertarian anchor babies (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchor_baby) to help outbreed the Massholes moving to New Hampshire.  And if she has a faghot twink (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twink_(gay_slang)) brother, hey, you get two for the price of one!  :lol:
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 16, 2010, 06:05:55 PM
Glad you can appreciate where I'm coming from.  Now go sham-marry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sham_marriage) a nice Chinese girl who needs an American citizenship to escape Communist oppression and make lots of libertarian anchor babies (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchor_baby) to help outbreed the Massholes moving to New Hampshire.  And if she has a faghot twink (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twink_(gay_slang)) brother, hey, you get two for the price of one!  :lol:


Too bad the Red Chinese have more freedom in her "Communist oppression" than we have here in the USA.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 16, 2010, 06:52:59 PM
Glad you can appreciate where I'm coming from.  Now go sham-marry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sham_marriage) a nice Chinese girl who needs an American citizenship to escape Communist oppression and make lots of libertarian anchor babies (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchor_baby) to help outbreed the Massholes moving to New Hampshire.  And if she has a faghot twink (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twink_(gay_slang)) brother, hey, you get two for the price of one!  :lol:

Too bad the Red Chinese have more freedom in her "Communist oppression" than we have here in the USA.

I'm really insulted that you'd say that.  Sure, they might have fewer stop signs and other trivialities, and things are improving, but they're still living under a shitty corrupt dictatorship with no personal or economic freedom whatsoever, especially if you can't afford to pay commie bureaucrats enough bribes.

So I'm sure plenty of Chinese chicks would marry Dale in a flash!

(http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn187/mrStriker1/akb48200806162.jpg)

 :P
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: dalebert on August 17, 2010, 10:33:08 AM
Glad you can appreciate where I'm coming from.

That's not what I said.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: John Shaw on August 17, 2010, 11:01:10 AM
Technically this thread could get Alex banned for violating the hate speech clause in the TOS.

Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: ForumTroll on August 17, 2010, 12:09:47 PM
Technically this thread could get Alex banned for violating the hate speech clause in the TOS.

All I see is:

"Spam, racism, flooding, advertisements, chain letters, pyramid schemes, and solicitations are forbidden on this forum."
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: John Shaw on August 17, 2010, 12:21:39 PM
Technically this thread could get Alex banned for violating the hate speech clause in the TOS.

All I see is:

"Spam, racism, flooding, advertisements, chain letters, pyramid schemes, and solicitations are forbidden on this forum."

Oh, he removed "Hate speech" and "Death Threats"?

Wasn't threatening to ban him, anyhow. Alex has long since had a free pass to do whatever he wants, apart from spamming. Some misguided folks want him around. I've successfully punished them by giving them what they want.

<<<Doesn't give a fuck, anymore. Just thought it was funny.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 17, 2010, 12:49:23 PM
Technically this thread could get Alex banned for violating the hate speech clause in the TOS.

C'mon, Shaw, you know I'm all about love (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=34218)!   :P

This BBS is about free speech, and I am expressing an honest and valuable opinion, valuable because a lot of people just don't have the balls to confront issues such as these honestly and constructively.  Do you violate the "hate speech clause" when you say what socialists are doing is illogical and they should try to change?


Some misguided folks want him around.  I've successfully punished them by giving them what they want.

I promise not to disappoint.  :D
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 17, 2010, 06:12:58 PM

This BBS is about free speech

bollocks
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 17, 2010, 07:08:02 PM
OK, 99% free speech.  The name of the site is "Free Talk Live".  I would be banned from pretty much anywhere else with the sort of shit I pull here almost every week.  Niggercock.

So, anyway, am I going to win this contest by default?  I hate winning!  Does anyone else feel a faghate rant coming on?  C'mon, let it rip!  Venting is good for the soul, they say.  This thread will be there when you're ready.

:lol:
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: ForumTroll on August 17, 2010, 07:09:50 PM
Technically this thread could get Alex banned for violating the hate speech clause in the TOS.

All I see is:

"Spam, racism, flooding, advertisements, chain letters, pyramid schemes, and solicitations are forbidden on this forum."

Oh, he removed "Hate speech" and "Death Threats"?

Wasn't threatening to ban him, anyhow. Alex has long since had a free pass to do whatever he wants, apart from spamming. Some misguided folks want him around. I've successfully punished them by giving them what they want.

<<<Doesn't give a fuck, anymore. Just thought it was funny.

I just looked because I seem to remember the death threats part too, and Richard has been sorta saying that in his thread.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 17, 2010, 07:16:53 PM
(http://www.pinknews.co.uk/images/godhatesfagschild.jpg)
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 17, 2010, 10:16:44 PM
All of your existence is a consequence of your parents succeeding at heterosexual reproduction.

And the four of your grandparents.

And eight of your great grandparents.

And 16 of your great-great grandparents.

And 32 of your great-great-great grandparents.

And 64 of your great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 128 of your great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 256 of your great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 512 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 1024 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 2048 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 4096 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 8192 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 16384 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 32768 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 65536 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 131072 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 262144 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 524288 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 1048576 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 2097152 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 4194304 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 8388608 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 16777216 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 33554432 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 67108864 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 134217728 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 268435456 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 536870912 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 1073741824 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 2147483648 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

And 4294967296 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

Etc, etc, etc, with lots of incest and inbreeding and all that good stuff along the way.

for x in range (40): print 'And %d of your %s grandparents.' % (2**(x+2), '-'.join(list(('great',)*x)))  # All your base are belong to us!  (See GPLv9.vrml for details.)

So, anyway, what was my point?

Oh, right, faghate.

Fags break the cycle.

All those great-great-great-greats had to work a lot harder to raise a family than you would.  Hunting mammoths and inventing the wheel 'n stuff.

Just one of those great-great-great-greats choosing to take it up the ass instead of having a family, POOF, no you!

Any questions?
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 17, 2010, 10:27:06 PM
Dude, founders effect.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 17, 2010, 10:54:20 PM
That (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founder_effect)'s mostly a Jewish problem (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_genetics_of_Jewish_people), the rest of humanity seems to be smart enough to mix things up every once in a while.  :lol:
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on August 17, 2010, 11:15:15 PM
That (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founder_effect)'s mostly a Jewish problem (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_genetics_of_Jewish_people), the rest of humanity seems to be smart enough to mix things up every once in a while.  :lol:
Not a problem in my family.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 17, 2010, 11:25:09 PM
That (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founder_effect)'s mostly a Jewish problem (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_genetics_of_Jewish_people), the rest of humanity seems to be smart enough to mix things up every once in a while.  :lol:

What I meant is that if you go back enough generations, the amount of ancestors you would necessarily have would outnumber the amount of people in the world.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 17, 2010, 11:40:35 PM
Obviously.  But what does that have to do with my natalist faghate propaganda here?
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: dalebert on August 18, 2010, 02:31:42 AM
And 4294967296 of your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

Etc, etc, etc, with lots of incest and inbreeding and all that good stuff along the way.

Just one of those great-great-great-greats choosing to take it up the ass instead of having a family, POOF, no you!

If my parents had sex an hour earlier than they did, the odds of the exact same sperm cell being the successful one are infinitesimal.  Or if my dad masturbated that morning, or if they were in a slightly different position, or got heartburn from eating an extra dinner roll.  And if either of my parent's parents had sex an hour earlier, or masturbated, or were in a slightly different position, etc.  Your specific existence is actually based on astronomical odds that make the last number in your list look like a joke.

Big numbers that have no real significance.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 18, 2010, 08:10:27 AM
(I hope you're conceptualizing this text with a Gilbert Gottfried (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilbert_Gottfried) voice, which is appropriate for most of my rants, except I sometimes switch to a Patrick Stewart (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Stewart) when I get serious.)

Now, I'm not glorifying your specific unique genetic outcome here (which would have been different even if played out twice in identical circumstances, because there's plenty of random chaos involved with how the amino acids fold, et cetera).  I'm talking about the effort your ancestors put into heterosexual reproduction, while running away from saber-toothed tigers and having dysentery and famine and the Assyrians on the warpath and the bubonic plague and the like!

And their women didn't have makeup or wrinkle cream or soap or hot water or vaginal hygiene products of any sort!  And they didn't have beer or 3D HD porn - the best cavemen could do to make sex with their wives more bearable is hit themselves over the head with a culb!  They had to get pregnant like 20 times to beat the odds of 2.1 sufficiently healthy children making it to adulthood!  Don't you think it would have been easier for them to get off doing whatever it is that you gay people do?  The one thing hunter-gatherers had plenty of was lard-lube!

Now fast forward to you, the dud of history, the last broken link in the chain, mooching off the hard work done by your ancestors and contemporary heterosexual parents everywhere.  When you buy an iPad, you are only able to do so because there was sufficient population around in order to build it, which requires the economic base of millions of people working together - coding Objective-C, maintaining the assembly robots, mining the raw materials, washing the factory floors, harvesting rice to feed others, etc.  And all those people came from a vagina!  Do you have any idea what an iPad would cost in a world where everyone who wanted to be gay could be gay?  Fagzillions!

So, to save the world from collapsing into total faggotry, I am advocating a stern program involving sensible fag-bashing, natalist propaganda, stronger Parents' Rights (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=30797), natural financial incentives (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=30621), and a new vaginal suppository product that will help gals attract gay guys (made in China from 100% organic free-range boy scout (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Pioneers_of_China) shit).
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 22, 2010, 08:16:20 AM
Recombining the DNA of two partners and producing a sort of mixed clone would speed the process of the complete end of sex, heterosexuality, and the male gender, as well as improving genetic technology exponentially.

Just sayin'.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 22, 2010, 10:53:29 AM
The technology ain't there yet - and it never will be unless y'all act your gender, pull your demographic weight, and keep the civilization going in the meantime!
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Stoker on August 22, 2010, 11:09:29 AM
Recombining the DNA of two partners and producing a sort of mixed clone would speed the process of the complete end of sex, heterosexuality, and the male gender, as well as improving genetic technology exponentially.

Just sayin'.

Bullshit. Just like everything that you say. You have no fucking idea what your talking about. You are just a confused fucked up being that can't find her place in the world, therefore you think it is the worlds fault. It isn't. Your endless "I hate humanity- especially Men" diatribe is lame as hell.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 22, 2010, 05:55:56 PM
Recombining the DNA of two partners and producing a sort of mixed clone would speed the process of the complete end of sex, heterosexuality, and the male gender, as well as improving genetic technology exponentially.

Just sayin'.

Bullshit. Just like everything that you say. You have no fucking idea what your talking about. You are just a confused fucked up being that can't find her place in the world, therefore you think it is the worlds fault. It isn't. Your endless "I hate humanity- especially Men" diatribe is lame as hell.

super cool story bro
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 22, 2010, 06:00:19 PM
TimeLady Victorious is genetically a dude, right?
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 22, 2010, 06:29:16 PM
TimeLady Victorious is genetically a dude, right?


let's just say there's a very good reaosn for my misandry.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on August 22, 2010, 07:03:42 PM
Recombining the DNA of two partners and producing a sort of mixed clone would speed the process of the complete end of sex, heterosexuality, and the male gender, as well as improving genetic technology exponentially.

Just sayin'.

Bullshit. Just like everything that you say. You have no fucking idea what your talking about. You are just a confused fucked up being that can't find her place in the world, therefore you think it is the worlds fault. It isn't. Your endless "I hate humanity- especially Men" diatribe is lame as hell.
I don't think I get that from TimeDude.

I agree that it's weird that he is a tranny.  I don't get why guys would dress up as women.  But other than the gender confusion I think he's a legit person who I would trust if met in person.  Seems like a stand up legit dude to me.  But how could anyone tell over the internet>
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Stoker on August 22, 2010, 07:09:18 PM
Fucking faggots identify as men, and should be killed like all piggish men.

Lesbians however will conquer the Earth and will be the only people around once superior lesbian geneticists find a way to completely get rid of the Y chromosome in men.

Whatever TLV is, he/she/it is definitely fully engulfed in a deep pool of hatred, especially towards men.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Amazing Richard on August 22, 2010, 07:19:47 PM
time lady is not a dude. She is a female.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 22, 2010, 07:35:07 PM
I mean genetic reality, not psychological delusion.  Wanting to be a chair does not make you a chair.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 22, 2010, 07:38:21 PM
I mean genetic reality, not psychological delusion.  Wanting to be a chair does not make you a chair.


(http://i474.photobucket.com/albums/rr110/puposka_bucket/16251476BettyPageinBondage3.jpg)

Same principle applies to a table, anyway...
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 22, 2010, 08:09:23 PM
I specifically said "chair (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chair)", not "table", "stool", "footstool", or "bitchstool".  A chair implies sturdy ground supports, a back, no metabolic functions, etc.  That's all you need, really.  I used to have a $500 executive leather chair - total waste of money, and it was worse on my back than a chair that costs 1/10th as much.  I personally am a big believer in what I'm sitting in right now: a sturdy metal folding chair (not the kind you see at WalMart for $20 but a good one).  It's lightly padded, comfortable for working, easily supports my 125 kg carcass (and that's after losing like 30 kg), cost-effective, doesn't ruin your back, and is very light to transport.  All other types of chairs are for commie faggots!  But I digress.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Amazing Richard on August 22, 2010, 08:16:42 PM
I mean genetic reality, not psychological delusion.  Wanting to be a chair does not make you a chair.


That's what I'm saying. She was born a female.

April (Time Lady) once implied that she has a penis, but I don't believe her. If she does have a "penis", then what she has is mixed genitals that she was born with, making her a hermaphrodite. Maybe she has a pussy and a penis.

She also has girl boobs, and I know that April does not have the kind of cash to get fake boobs or go on some kind of hormones to grow boobs. So her boobs are natural.

In the end, April likes to fuck with peoples' minds about what she is. If she isn't a hermaphrodite, then she was born a female.

Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 22, 2010, 08:24:41 PM
I'm sitting in a crappy office chair that's kinda broken. I'd sit in a metal folding chair but those are hell on my back.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Amazing Richard on August 22, 2010, 08:25:04 PM
I was researching Lesbianism the other day, and got a good dose of hardcore feminist bullshit.

There is such a term called a "Gold Star Lesbian". These lesbians are called "gold star" because they have never had a sexual interaction with a male. Many lesbians despise the idea that their girlfriends have had a cock up their pussies, and I'm sure that many lesbians who are not "gold star" have all sorts of issues cuz they allowed a cock in the pussy, prior to identifying as a lesbian.

Lesbianism's hatred of men runs very deep in the subculture. The hate is so intense that it turns into comedy. A huge amount of lesbians will not date bisexual females cuz they find their dealings with men to be intensely repulsive. I've read a bunch of stuff by the lesbians and if they do choose to get with a bisexual female, the lesbians can't stand it for long, cuz at some point, the bisexual female will start talking about how guys are hot, or maybe about her past boyfriends....and then the lesbian gets sick to her stomach from listening to this kind of talk.

Most lesbians and gays say that they are not attracted to the opposite sex, but this is total bullshit...."gays" and "lesbians" are often attracted to the opposite sex, and "straights" are often attracted to the same sex. So it's interesting to look at the mindset of a hardcore lesbian feminist, and see just how psychologically fucked up they are. Regardless of what a lesbian says, she is still naturally attracted to men, and she will have to suppress those feelings of interest just to maintain the facade of a lesbian "identity". I reckon the lesbian's "man-hate" manifests itself more aggressively due to the deep resentment of still being naturally attracted to men, regardless of the amount of anti-male conceptualizing that lesbians do.

The beauty in nature is that nature doesn't give a fuck about a human's view of the world through bullshit conceptualism. We humans think we are really clever with our ideas and "identities" and bullshit facades, and so when nature ignores all these conceptual facades and keeps it business as usual, the human facade gets upset.

LOL.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 22, 2010, 08:32:50 PM
Great job, Prince Pu - this contest thread is no longer a one-man race!

And if TimeLady Victorious is genetically female and has a functional vagina, I'd abandon my asexuality (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=32530) and fuck her for charity no matter what she looks like or how many penises she has!   :lol:
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 22, 2010, 08:36:48 PM
Great job, Prince Pu - this contest thread is no longer a one-man race!

And if TimeLady Victorious is genetically female and has a functional vagina, I'd abandon my asexuality (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=32530) and fuck her for charity no matter what she looks like or how many penises she has!   :lol:


I identify as asexual, but I'm not aromantic.

Make sure you bring a fine wine (preferably made in a still behind your trailer, in order to not have to apply for a BATF permit or to pay any sort of tax) and some cut wildflowers.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Turd Ferguson on August 22, 2010, 08:40:16 PM
My uneducated guess would be that about 80% of the "gold star" lezbos are lying about never being with a man. They just wanted to get that gold star and have bragging rights, not to mention the embarassment of admitting they "trieda da dick" . :D

Sorta like a kid in 4th grade will cheat on a test, or have his mom do his homework for him......... gotta get that gold star!!!!
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 22, 2010, 08:56:28 PM
Libman don't do wine and roses.  Also Libman no longer drives.  That really cramps my style.  I know it's theoretically possible to have sex without a bimmer, but...   :(
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on August 22, 2010, 09:01:15 PM
Libman don't do wine and roses.  Also Libman no longer drives.  That really cramps my style.  I know it's theoretically possible to have sex without a bimmer, but...   :(
What do you need a bimmer to have sex in?  A Suburban works perfectly well...as does a motorcycle :)
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Stoker on August 22, 2010, 09:11:36 PM
Make sure you bring a fine wine (preferably made in a still behind your trailer, in order to not have to apply for a BATF permit or to pay any sort of tax) and some cut wildflowers.

Wine is made in barrels. A still is used to distill liquor. I will stand by my assertion that you have no fucking idea what you are talking about, and apparently this applies to all subjects.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: dalebert on August 22, 2010, 09:44:15 PM
There's a fair amount of evidence that there's a genetic component to homosexual attraction.  So encouraging gay people to reproduce could result in more and more gay-inclined children who are less likely to reproduce.  Your plans would likely breed more gays.  Encourage gay people to adopt kids and raise them as libertarians, which doesn't appear to have a genetic component.  I can't help but wonder if the number of gay people today may have a lot to do with the pressure on gay people historically to conform to heterosexual behavior.  If we remove the taboo associated with gayness, it might actually become more rare over several generations... which would be a bad thing, but I'm just sayin'.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 22, 2010, 10:09:29 PM
What do you need a bimmer to have sex in?  A Suburban works perfectly well...as does a motorcycle :)

You're despicable.


[...]  you have no fucking idea what you are talking about, and apparently this applies to all subjects.

That's actually some solid evidence of her being a woman right there!   :)


There's a fair amount of evidence that there's a genetic component to homosexual attraction.  [...]

And that's why tribes that torture and kill homosexuals have a lot more homosexuals than tribes where homosexuality is normal but bisexuality is taboo...  Oh, wait, no, that's ain't the case at all!


Your plans would likely breed more gays.  [...]

I don't think that is true, and I don't have a problem with that just as long as the demographic crisis is solved.  Also the application of the Parents Tax (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=30621) idea would create an economic incentive for people to pick the best sperm to produce profitable children, not necessarily one's own.  Fag-bashing is just a stop-gap solution - in 3-6 generations all children will be grown in test-tubes and raised by greedy corporations seeking to optimize their tax profits, but somehow we have to keep the economy going until we get there.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Amazing Richard on August 22, 2010, 10:16:57 PM
Ever since I was a youngster, I've recognized that I was sexually attracted to both males and females. People have always accused me of being “gay”, and there were a few short periods where I entertained this notion that others were throwing at me, and I'd start to think that maybe these people knew something that I did not, and that maybe I was a homosexual. In the end, I always knew that I was not “gay”, and that I would simply have to put up with this conclusion that people wanted to make about my sexuality.

In queer circles, it's a common notion that if a dude is into guys and girls, then he is gay, and if a chick likes guys and girls, she is really straight ...or it will be just the lesbians who will try to get her to think that she is a “lesbian”. The gays and lesbians try to make you “choose”. They try to make you choose, because they are trying to reinforce their own bullshit gay/lesbian “identities”.

Throughout an individual's lifetime, it's very likely that at some point or another, every individual will experience attraction to people of the same sex. In our circles, this sort of thing is referred to as “fluidity” and it's totally natural, and it doesn't mean you are “gay” or a “lesbian”, because the “identity “ of gays/lesbians and straights is total 100% complete socially engineered bullshit. If you reckon yerself 100% straight or gay, then all that means it that you are totally conditioned by this facade “identity” that you hold on to.

If you are experiencing this “fluidity”, then there is no need to question yer sexuality, unless you identify as a straight, gay or lesbian. If you identify as those things, then you need to recognize that such “identities” are pure fake-ass bullshit.

From experience, I know that the straights, gays and lesbians are totally full of shit. And these fake-ass people with their “identities” will try to mess with the minds of people who recognize the fluid states of sexuality.

Those people are Fake-ass.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 22, 2010, 10:22:20 PM
is sexuality strictly defined by intercourse?
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 23, 2010, 12:06:24 AM
is sexuality strictly defined by intercourse?

Nope. People who have sex with others in jail are usually heterosexual, but circumstances make them temporarily homosexual.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 26, 2010, 08:17:05 PM
I was just informed that the mascot of Gentoo Linux is a transsexual cow (http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6402555.html#6402555) (as opposed to an innocent cartoonish male cow).  HAS THE WHOLE WORLD TURNED GAY?!?!?!?!
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: libertylover on August 26, 2010, 08:32:15 PM
I was just informed that the mascot of Gentoo Linux is a transsexual cow (http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6402555.html#6402555) (as opposed to an innocent cartoonish male cow).  HAS THE WHOLE WORLD TURNED GAY?!?!?!?!
(http://blog.codefront.net/archives/screenshots/larry-the-cow-abducted.png)
Is this what you mean?  How can you tell the cow is transsexual?
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Stoker on August 26, 2010, 08:43:00 PM
I think he is referring to the "cow" having both horns and udders. This would probably be more accurately described as an hermaphrodite, although no male genitalia can be seen.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: libertylover on August 27, 2010, 10:04:05 AM
I think he is referring to the "cow" having both horns and udders. This would probably be more accurately described as an hermaphrodite, although no male genitalia can be seen.
You city people crack me up sometimes. 

Female Bovine have horns it is just typical the female calf's horn buds to be removed shortly after birth for better handling.  The typical black and white milk cow is a Holstein.  Holstein both sexes have horns the females if allowed to grow would just be smaller than the bulls horns.  The best quality milk comes from grass fed non-hormone injected Jersey cows and if you can get it raw consider yourself very lucky.

There are some hornless breeds that domestically had horns bred out of them. 
Angus/Red Angus
Galloway
Red Poll
Red Brangus
Brangus
British White
Speckle Park
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Stoker on August 27, 2010, 10:12:37 AM
WTF is with people always reading something into a statement that simply isn't there? I know plenty of people that live in rural areas that would try to milk a bull, so the idea that your "not a city person" somehow instantly gives you knowledge of cattle is ridiculous. I didn't say that I agreed with Alex' assertion that the image was "transexual". You asked "how he could tell it was transexual" and I gave my 2 cents worth about where that idea may have come from and nothing more. BTW, I am hardly a "city person".
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 27, 2010, 01:17:42 PM
[...]  Alex' assertion that the image was "transexual"  [...]

I did not originate the idea, I merely expressed my astonishment in reaction to what was said on another forum, as part of my ongoing "HAS THE WHOLE WORLD TURNED GAY?!?!?!?!" routine (originally by Homer Simpson (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homer's_Phobia), but...  he turned gay also (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Gays_of_the_Condo) [2] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There's_Something_About_Marrying)).  Of course, I should have known it - all copyLEFT software mascots (http://chl.be/mascots/) are gay!  If you look closely, you can see some jizz stuck to the GNU (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU) logo's beard!  Who the hell would wear a red fedora?!  And Tux (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tux) has been taking it up the ass for years!


(http://img11.imagehosting.gr/out.php/i1405921_linux-bsd.jpg)


Anyway, this thread isn't about Loonix nor the subsidy-and-regulation-magnets you call cows, this thread is about homophobia, err, I mean faghate heroics.  Let's pick up the pace, people!  Chant with me now:


MAN + WOMAN == BABIES!

MAN + MAN == TURDS!


By which I mean Taxes, Underpopulation, Recession, Depression, and Socialism - all things caused in part by gays!
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 31, 2010, 03:23:18 AM
Communist faggotry news roundup:




Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: dalebert on August 31, 2010, 10:49:13 AM

There's a fair amount of evidence that there's a genetic component to homosexual attraction.  [...]

And that's why tribes that torture and kill homosexuals have a lot more homosexuals than tribes where homosexuality is normal but bisexuality is taboo...  Oh, wait, no, that's ain't the case at all!


Not familiar with such data, but if that's the case, then my immediate thought is if gays are tortured and killed via a very public tribal policy, then gays will be likely to suppress any genetically based behavior for gayness and pass it on to their offspring until someone is SO gay that they act on it even at great risk in the presence of such oppression.  So it certainly does not seem like evidence that tremendous pressure for gay people to behave str8 and reproduce doesn't breed more gayness.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 31, 2010, 11:52:34 AM
A lot of societies have been torturing and killing turd-pushers since the dawn of time.  Some (i.e. the societies that didn't have to struggle very hard in maintaining optimal population) didn't.  Most societies have now been liberalized to the point where anyone can be openly gay.  According to your theory, an island where any sexual deviance was taboo would now have significantly different faggotry rates vs one where bisexuality was norm vs one where exclusive homosexuals were tolerated but traditionally didn't reproduce, and that simply isn't true.

People will screw anything that gives them pleasure, and, in absence of faghate, faggotry does seem to work for most people, because it liberates them from the responsibilities of family.  History is filled with stories of whole towns "going gay" - which isn't fatal in of itself, but it can be through disease, or if they also largely abandon heterosexual reproduction.

Torturing and killing gays is a basic instinct of civilization.  I've heard that Alaskan sled dogs will ostracize and aggress against any dog that's slacking off (which means all the other dogs have to pull harder).  Primitive / socialist societies behave the same way toward people who don't work hard enough, but capitalism has largely solved this dilemma by finding more civilized means of encouraging people to pull their economic weight.  The matter of demographic weight, however, still remains unsolved (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=30621).
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: dalebert on August 31, 2010, 12:25:39 PM
According to your theory, an island where any sexual deviance was taboo would now have significantly different faggotry rates vs one where bisexuality was norm vs one where exclusive homosexuals were tolerated but traditionally didn't reproduce, and that simply isn't true.

My point is we can't judge by the data because you're altering behavior but not necessarily sexual orientation, particularly to the extent that it's genetic.  Also, I suspect there's a lot more data to support some sort of biological basis for homosexuality than there is accurate data showing the rates of gay or bi sexual orientation (not behavior) in primitive tribes.  Also, I think if you keep wanting to refer to these studies to support your position, you need to start linking them so their merits can be judged.  There's a lot of crappy studies that were performed by organizations with incredible bias and poor scientific method.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: davann on August 31, 2010, 02:03:43 PM
There's a fair amount of evidence that there's a genetic component to homosexual attraction.  


It is not. It is chemical. The fact is scientists noticed a commonality with a percentage of homosexual males being a younger brother. It turns out a certain chemical is depleted during the pregnancy of the first male. The second male does not receive enough of this chemical and can change the sexual orientation of the offspring. Sorry to disappoint you. It is chemical and can be "treated" later in life. Although, treated might be the wrong word and offensive the fact remains there is way to change sexual orientation by chemical adjustments.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on August 31, 2010, 02:17:49 PM
According to your theory, an island where any sexual deviance was taboo would now have significantly different faggotry rates vs one where bisexuality was norm vs one where exclusive homosexuals were tolerated but traditionally didn't reproduce, and that simply isn't true.

My point is we can't judge by the data because you're altering behavior but not necessarily sexual orientation, particularly to the extent that it's genetic.  Also, I suspect there's a lot more data to support some sort of biological basis for homosexuality than there is accurate data showing the rates of gay or bi sexual orientation (not behavior) in primitive tribes.  Also, I think if you keep wanting to refer to these studies to support your position, you need to start linking them so their merits can be judged.  There's a lot of crappy studies that were performed by organizations with incredible bias and poor scientific method.

You've said (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=34607.msg610530#msg610530) that my faghate (which is just a trollterm for non-violent cultural heteronormativity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heteronormativity)) "would likely breed more gays".  I've dismissed this claim, because:

(1)  There is no conclusive anthropological evidence to back it up, and one would expect that there would be if it were true, given the abundance of isolated tribes with very different sexual mores.  The burden of proof for inherited genetic causality of homosexuality remains in your court.

(2)  I don't care what sexual predispositions people have, I care about solving the one fatal flaw of libertarian economics, which is fertility rates (as well as related problems, like dysgenic effects, etc).  No matter how gay you are, biological reproduction and commitment to your offspring should still be your foremost priority.  Although it's not written in stone, sexual exclusivity does play an important psychological role in encouraging family stability.  People who value playing with their shit-hole more than they value human life and civilization deserve no respect.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: MacFall on August 31, 2010, 06:23:59 PM
Was Alex recently shot down by a homo?

Actually, on second thought it did not necessarily have to be recently.  Alex hangs on to grains of sand life hands him until they develop into warped pearls of ranting hatred.  He strings them together in a masturbatory necklace of homophobia.

Are you saying he got a pearl necklace of hate from gay people?
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on September 01, 2010, 12:48:55 AM
You know, this reference to Larry The Cow got me thinking about something...  If you abandon all psychological associations and just look at it analytically...  We don't see drinking milk as some perverted form of bestiality, but what makes milk that much different from sperm, really?  Sperm is actually a lot more nutritious (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semen#Nutritional_value) than milk, and I guess just as safe if pasteurized.  We might have been milking bovines of the wrong gender since the dawn of civilization!  :lol:
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: dalebert on September 01, 2010, 06:13:13 PM
Identical vs. fraternal twin studies show nearly overwhelming evidence that there is some component of genetics that influences sexual orientation while also proving that it's definitely not the only factor.  Even the skeptics and biased (http://www.narth.com/docs/whitehead2.html) don't try to deny that.  All they can reasonably do is try to downplay it in comparison to other factors.

Evidence also supports the notion presented that younger brothers are more likely to be gay than older, but there's no evidence at all that orientation can be altered later in life.  It seems to be determined at the latest by about age six.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: davann on September 01, 2010, 07:30:04 PM
Could not the depletion of the chemical during pregnancy alter the genetic makeup of the offspring? Seems plausible to me.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on September 01, 2010, 08:03:57 PM
Identical vs. fraternal twin studies show nearly overwhelming evidence that there is some component of genetics  [...]

(1)  Incidents of fraternal twins (http://www.drspock.com/article/0,1510,5089,00.html) correlate with use of fertility treatments, and thus with certain hormonal and socioeconomic factors, and there are even ethnic differences in probabilities of those outcomes.  This in of itself should be enough to dismiss those studies as meaningless.

(2)  Even more importantly, "identical" twins lead identical expectations, which become a self-fulfilling prophecy.  They look alike, they are treated alike, and they treat each-other as extensions of themselves and often mirror each-other in every minute behavioral and emotional detail.  That's "nurture", not "nature".

(3)  Everything has some component of genetics, from alcoholism to pedophilia to rape to murder.  So friggin' what?
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: dalebert on September 01, 2010, 09:25:33 PM
(3)  Everything has some component of genetics, from alcoholism to pedophilia to rape to murder.  So friggin' what?

Then you have to admit it's possible to breed for a higher or lower occurrence of gays.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on September 01, 2010, 11:10:51 PM
(1)  Notice that I divided my post into multiple enumerated points, and those points do not necessarily have a conjunctionary relationship.  It's like a chess analyst saying if you more there (scenario A) he'll checkmate you that way, and if you move there (scenario B) he'll checkmate you the other way - that doesn't mean the two checkmates will occur in the same actual game.

(2)  This point intentionally left blank.

(3)  Not all genetic factors are inherited, some come from random chance of how genes are combined.

(4)  This is a faghate contest thread, not a Dr Phil episode on how we must all be sensitive to what others are going through.  Evolution is not about your feelings, it's about motherfucking results!

(5)  Is that jizz coming out your ears?
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: dalebert on September 02, 2010, 08:14:08 AM
Except you checkmated yourself when you said I have to prove a genetic component and then conceding there is one.
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on September 02, 2010, 02:52:22 PM
(1)  As I tried to explain, those are completely different threads of logical progression.

(2)  You can't checkmate yourself in chess.  (Unless perhaps you're Bobby Fischer.  (Now there's a man who could win a faghate contest with two balls tied behind his back!  (Speaking of which, he's being exhumed for a paternity test (http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/6099462-body-of-bobby-fischer-to-be-exhumed-for-a-paternity-test)...  (And you won't be, you fag!  (Unless it's a false accusation of course.  (But who'd want to make a false accusation against you?  (Unless she wanted your money of course.  (But you probably won't have much money left after your inevitable battle with AIDS 3.0...  (Unless of course you die before then in a weird anal masturbation accident of some sort.  (Don't use a full shovel!  (OK, if you do, just be sure not to slip on the Santorum.  (By which I mean the senator himself, you probably know him.  (In which case you should definitely have Dave Ridley hide in your bedroom closet.  (Assuming he's not there already.  (Not that I have any reason to believe that he is.  (But, c'mon, no straight man enjoys making an ass of himself in front of a camera that much.  (I just hope Ridley doesn't get the AIDS 3.0 from you, cause he's actually doing useful things for the liberty movement...)))))))))))))))))
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: mrapplecastle on September 02, 2010, 07:54:17 PM
you two should get a room....fags
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on September 02, 2010, 09:02:31 PM
Um, you just walked into it...
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: dalebert on September 03, 2010, 10:07:39 PM
This story will turn str8 guys gay.  Read at your own risk.

Mutant Triple X (http://anti-state.com/forum/index.php?board=3;action=display;threadid=23036)
Title: Re: The Definitive Faghate Rant Contest Thread!!!
Post by: Alex Libman on September 03, 2010, 10:14:24 PM
This thread is over.

This forum is over.

Free Talk Live is over.

The Free State Project is over.

The liberty movement is over.