In a free society you shouldn't care about, sex, color, crede, sexual preference, sexual favored position, age, body mass index, or whether they sing in a shower badly, pray to strange statues in their basement, or run naked through their house shouting viva la Republic* . (Not enough room to post all the variables that totally annoy people about other people.)
The bottom line: Does it do real financial or physical harm to yourself? If the answer is NO then the argument over whether or not, scientific proof or not is totally irrelevant. No fraud was committed and as I have stated before she has actually helped the show with this attention. She isn't asking for a government hand out to get an operation. She isn't trying to force her way into your private business but simply asking to be accepted. You can agree or not, that is your right. There no need to constantly slam a person for who they feel that they are and who is doing you no real harm. By slaming a persons own concept of who they are you are the one that is doing the harm.
Those against are revealing their own fears not based in the reality of what is presented with the topic question. Should Bridget Stay on the Shrine? It is a preference question not a question based on what you think of her personal lifestyle choice. It is not a question about how you have been fooled in the past and how that made you angry. It is not a scientific question on the merits of her individual case. It is not a question of how someone might be a fraud in the future hypothetical world you weave in your own mind and how that will make you angry. In fact if you succeed you will be making an enviornment where fraud is more likely to occure. So just get over it and let people be free to be what makes them happy.