Oh, btw, Grey you keep using statistics terms as moral terms.
First, state how being yourself is immoral? This isn't a trick question of saying being a murderer, rapist, filanderer and such is okay, but rather what is the moral issue of being, considering being isn't doing....
seriously, what did you say?? you make no sense. "first state how being immoral is yourself"?!!
Actually, I'm not sure I even want that clarified - b/c from past experience, whenever someone debates w/ you - you end up childish-ly name-calling and such.... it'd be pointless and exhausting.
Second, you just want to call transgendered people 'fugly' because you probably NEVER met a transsexual or transgendered until ME. So please stop with the bullshit.
That picture you posted of that mangirl was indeed fugly. I mean, when they actually try and look attractive by attempting to be seductive or whatever - it just looks pathetic and yes,
ugly. It's like if a really fat girl tries to slip into a thong or bikini... look how you must, but dear God, (saying this to any really overweigh woman):
stop living in denial, you are not a 115 lb women. Likewise, transgenders are just transvestites...
you aren't going to attract straight men. Well that's just it I suppose, they're going after gay ones..... enjoy....
Also, equivocating Dana with Hitler is like equivocating Rush with the author of the Turner Diaries, so stop being obsurd and follow the logic of the argument.
you missed the point - that just b/c someone is convinced w/ what you're doing is right or just - doesn't make it so...
The argument still stands, wo/man and fe/male are not the same, you lost. Now eat your humble pie, Jeebus sucker.
Silly Christians, Moral Absolutism doesn't work in the real world....
-- Bridget
*ding ding ding*...
you hit it right on the head! thank you!!
that's
exactly why we have all this pain and suffering in the world - everyone doesn't follow moral absolutism...
There is a natural law, and when not followed, you get chaos.
when you're a subject moralist - it's easy to justify the genocide of any one group - b/c well, "it's for the greater good"... or they're "less human"... or whatever....
hmmm maybe I should try this subjective moralism... "gee, I think I don't like people that are different than me. they don't look normal, so I'm going to punch them all in the face".... yeah... sure... that works for me... I mean, morals are subjective, right?
That's exactly the fallacy and problem you run into when you have such a distorted world view.