Ron Paul on the Attack

[Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith)]

Probably the best smear ad I've seen so far this campaign season:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUHlIPJTMIg
[youtube]kUHlIPJTMIg[/youtube]

[Turd Ferguson]

Yeah, he's really getting in there this time around. Got nothing to lose at all, considering he's retiring if he doesn't win.

If he ends up losing, and knows it, he should whip out his cock on stage, wag it at the audience at the last debate, and say "Later losers...... good luck!"

Who knows though. He might even pull it off (the election, not his cock) if people aren't as stupid as I give them credit for.

[anarchir]

They are, they are.

[LTKoblinsky]

I had hope, then I watched the Rachel Maddow/Chris Matthews post-debate 'analysis.'  Now I just want to find a brick to meet my forehead. Ignorance may be bliss...

[Cognitive Dissident]

The MSNBC crew obviously took it as their opportunity to lampoon Republicans.  I'm somewhat surprised the Republican party decided to work with them.  They weren't respectful four years ago, and they were probably worse tonight.  Fox would probably be just as bad to Democrats--don't remember if Fox has done Democrat debates.

I was sorta surprised it took so long before Matthews was the first to point out the eery applause the death penalty got--specifically when the number of inmates put to death was reported.  I was also surprised the questioners didn't come back at Perry with the number of death row inmates that have had their convictions reversed, after he announced his confidence in the process.

As for the OP, there were some hints about it before the commercial played.  Some of their comments were a little confusing until the commercial aired, then I understood their context.  It had to do with Reagan vs Paul, and Reagan's message vs his actions, and it made a lot more sense afterward.  Basically, it was intended to be a "gotcha" question about Ron Paul being the one who "stood with Reagan."