Republicans being let in and ruining libertarian/anarchist groups

[libertylover]

Capital "R" Republican is just a political party.  It is not an political ideology.  One can be a liberal, conservative, moderate, libertarian or possibly even an anarchist Republican.

How can one be an anarchist Republican? Doesn't belief in anarchism preclude government from existing at all?

Couldn't you use this same argument against anarchist Libertarian?

[blackie]

I know the founder, he isn't a Republican.

He's a member of Skull and Bones.

This is a joke, right?

I don't have any proof that Jason Sorens is a skull and bones member.

He has never denied being one when asked.

Of course not.  Although Boners are allowed to kill hundreds of thousands of people to enhance the financial positions of their buddies, they are never allowed to deny that they are Boners.  You never ever see them break that rule.

Normal people, of course, will when asked say "No, I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of Skull & Bones."

Example:  I myself am not a Member, therefore I am free to say it:
I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of Skull & Bones.

Jason and Bush, on the other hand, are Boners and are forbidden by their Secret Rule to deny that fact, and so you will never ever hear either of them say it.

It's been another 4 years... has anyone seen a denial by Sorens in all that time?

[libertylover]

What open immigration not working out because people of a slightly different ideological make up are migrating into your groups and out voting you?  
Built up a organization only to see a bunch of people overwhelm your numbers and change the direction of your organization sucks for those pushed out.  The whole concept behind the FSP was to move people who are for smaller government and more personal freedom to an area in sufficient numbers to influence elections and change or maintain the pro-liberty political leanings of New Hampshire.   When open immigration brings in a bunch of authoritarians who out vote you, then what?  It is easy enough to remove yourself from a group which has been taken over by an opposing political affiliation.  It is nearly impossible to remove yourself from your country.   And before someone claims I am being racist, immigrants from any number of Caucasian nanny states can be just as undesirable politically.  Should there be a political ideological test for immigrates or members to a group?  Shouldn't that be a concern in the United States in general or New Hampshire specifically?

[Rebel]

I'm gonna have to break ranks with the good ole boy network here and say this thread's subject heading is complete bunk. I opened this thread thinking that the LP and B-crash would be the main culprits, but bj is way off on this one.

[Euler]

Capital "R" Republican is just a political party.  It is not an political ideology.  One can be a liberal, conservative, moderate, libertarian or possibly even an anarchist Republican.

How can one be an anarchist Republican? Doesn't belief in anarchism preclude government from existing at all?

Not likely but possible.  At one time in the 80's or 90's, 60% of the LIbertarian Party were polled as anarchists.  But they were still involved in political actions for either self-defense and/or educational reasons.

[BonerJoe]

I'm gonna have to break ranks with the good ole boy network here and say this thread's subject heading is complete bunk. I opened this thread thinking that the LP and B-crash would be the main culprits, but bj is way off on this one.

I guess we won't be able to hangout at PF then.

[Rebel]

I'm gonna have to break ranks with the good ole boy network here and say this thread's subject heading is complete bunk. I opened this thread thinking that the LP and B-crash would be the main culprits, but bj is way off on this one.

I guess we won't be able to hangout at PF then.

We can chill, but don't be so blasphemous.

[BonerJoe]

http://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?topic=3538.0

[JWI]

Goddamn Lizard Jews are at it again.

[Rebel]

http://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?topic=3538.0

Lame and way too old to post. Womp womp

[BonerJoe]

http://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?topic=3538.0

Lame and way too old to post. Womp womp

I'll ask him at PorcFest, then. If he isn't in NY.

[One two three]

Capital "R" Republican is just a political party.  It is not an political ideology.  One can be a liberal, conservative, moderate, libertarian or possibly even an anarchist Republican.

How can one be an anarchist Republican? Doesn't belief in anarchism preclude government from existing at all?

Republican is a political party.  Anarchism is a believe system.  A person can be a party of any political party and also a member of any believe system.  As far as I know, none of them are mutually exclusive.

Also, to answer your question, no.

[One two three]

I know the founder, he isn't a Republican.

He's a member of Skull and Bones.

And a dickhead.

At least he isn't a dishonest bum.