The Free Talk Live BBS

Free Talk Live => General => Topic started by: ForumTroll on January 01, 2010, 07:33:54 PM

Title: Re: Sex
Post by: ForumTroll on January 01, 2010, 07:33:54 PM
Why not let us use Helios too?

Okay, there it is again.  Thanks for asking nicely.

I DIDNT KNOW WE HAD TO SUCK YOUR COCK TO GET THINGS DONE
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: FTL_Ian on January 01, 2010, 08:00:42 PM
I DIDNT KNOW WE HAD TO SUCK YOUR COCK TO GET THINGS DONE

Problem with your keyboard?  I might fix that too for a good cocksucking.   :P
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: sillyperson on January 01, 2010, 09:28:33 PM
I might fix that too for a good cocksucking.
I recall you posting earlier that you found BJs to be "boring"
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: ForumTroll on January 01, 2010, 09:48:41 PM
I DIDNT KNOW WE HAD TO SUCK YOUR COCK TO GET THINGS DONE

Problem with your keyboard?  I might fix that too for a good cocksucking.   :P

LETS PLAY SOME VIDEO GAMES
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: FTL_Ian on January 01, 2010, 10:13:27 PM
I might fix that too for a good cocksucking.
I recall you posting earlier that you found BJs to be "boring"


Maybe that wasn't the right term, how about overrated?  I tend to think sex is overrated, but that may have something to do with my apparently lower sex drive than most males.  Orgasms are nice to have and all, but I do enjoy the giving of them more than receiving.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: ForumTroll on January 01, 2010, 10:50:11 PM
I THINK IAN LIKES IT UP THE BUTT
Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: AL the Inconspicuous on January 02, 2010, 06:07:32 AM
I think Ian enjoys having aural sex with each and every one of us, 12 podcast hours a week (plus any overtime).  :P

Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Brooklyn Red Leg on January 02, 2010, 09:13:49 AM
Maybe that wasn't the right term, how about overrated?

Hehe, go for a long time without them and they won't be as overrated. :P :wink: :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: FTL_Ian on January 02, 2010, 02:21:20 PM
I have gone without, and what I miss most is pleasing my partner.  My orgasm is just a perk.  I can have one of those anytime.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: sillyperson on January 02, 2010, 02:24:42 PM
My orgasm is just a jerk.  I can have one of those anytime.
Not in public. Please.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Zappa88 on January 02, 2010, 02:47:50 PM
Quote
Orgasms are nice to have and all, but I do enjoy the giving of them more than receiving.

You god damn little socialist. Ayn Rand would be ashamed. Probably.
Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: AL the Inconspicuous on January 02, 2010, 07:30:44 PM
No, I recall Ayn Rand specifically has mentioned the well-justified pride one sex partner feels in conquering through pleasure the body of the other.  Or something like that.  I stopped trying to memorize all of Ayn Rand's writings few years ago when I became more radical.  Of course real tax resisters pleasure themselves into a jar of pennies to be used for future activism.  :roll:
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: MasterShake on January 02, 2010, 10:53:36 PM
Maybe that wasn't the right term, how about overrated?

Hehe, go for a long time without them and they won't be as overrated. :P :wink: :mrgreen:

Hell, try being MARRIED and they won't seem overrated.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: inane on January 02, 2010, 11:57:56 PM
maybe i just never had a "good" blowjob, but i agree that they are overrated. I like sex though. A lot.

As for the Ayn Rand thing, giving my girlfriend an orgasm turns me on. So its not a selfless act. Side note: who else here loves watching women masturbate? 
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: sillyperson on January 03, 2010, 10:42:26 AM
who else here loves watching women masturbate? 
To save a hell of a lot of time & duplicate posts, let's ask the opposite question
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Lindsey on January 03, 2010, 10:46:17 AM
Sex?  Overrated?  Pfsh.  You're doing it wrong.   :lol:
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: sillyperson on January 03, 2010, 04:10:10 PM
Sex?  Overrated?  Pfsh.  You're doing it wrong.   :lol:
.... or she is  :shock:
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Lindsey on January 03, 2010, 09:39:55 PM
Sex?  Overrated?  Pfsh.  You're doing it wrong.   :lol:
.... or she is  :shock:

Both are terrible to think about.  As is the fact that I don't get enough of teh secks.   :lol:
Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on January 04, 2010, 12:08:15 AM
No, I recall Ayn Rand specifically has mentioned the well-justified pride one sex partner feels in conquering through pleasure the body of the other.  Or something like that.  I stopped trying to memorize all of Ayn Rand's writings few years ago when I became more radical.  Of course real tax resisters pleasure themselves into a jar of pennies to be used for future activism.  :roll:


"alex libman's jizz pennies" sound a lot worse than "ass pennies"

also sex IS overrated, while you're spending time rutting like animals you could be reading or watching a video or listening to podcasts, all three of are lots more useful in the long run
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on January 04, 2010, 12:21:50 AM
'In the long run' if sex was overrated we'd go extinct.  Thank you universe for making cream pies so satisfying.  B/c  it is rated so highly, I can now enjoy books, video's and podcasts.  You NERDS leave the fucking to the real men like RIchard III.  He get's thousands of pussys a year.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on January 04, 2010, 12:59:25 AM
'In the long run' if sex was overrated we'd go extinct.  Thank you universe for making cream pies so satisfying.  B/c  it is rated so highly, I can now enjoy books, video's and podcasts.  You NERDS leave the fucking to the real men like RIchard III.  He get's thousands of pussys a year.

maybe we should go extinct

the sun's just gonna go nova in five billion years anyway
Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on January 04, 2010, 01:41:58 AM
No, I recall Ayn Rand specifically has mentioned the well-justified pride one sex partner feels in conquering through pleasure the body of the other.  Or something like that.  I stopped trying to memorize all of Ayn Rand's writings few years ago when I became more radical.  Of course real tax resisters pleasure themselves into a jar of pennies to be used for future activism.  :roll:


"alex libman's jizz pennies" sound a lot worse than "ass pennies"

also sex IS overrated, while you're spending time rutting like animals you could be reading or watching a video or listening to podcasts, all three of are lots more useful in the long run
LOLOL

RIDICULOUS. 
Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: error on January 04, 2010, 01:42:39 AM
If you can't have a discussion of the finer points of Austrian economics while having sex, you are having sex with the wrong person.
Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on January 04, 2010, 01:44:00 AM
If you can't have a discussion of the finer points of Austrian economics while having sex, you are having sex with the wrong person.
That's funny too.

Rutting is Rutting.  Economics is Economics.  They only way they should mix is if you're in Vegas or Amsterdam or a shady part of town.
Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: error on January 04, 2010, 01:45:46 AM
I dunno, we've had more simultaneous orgasms in the last week than most people have in their entire lives.
Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on January 04, 2010, 01:59:54 AM
I dunno, we've had more simultaneous orgasms in the last week than most people have in their entire lives.
Sounds like fun.  Reminds me of Vegas when my room got me tons of free enjoyment when advertised at the club.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: spicynujac on January 04, 2010, 02:27:10 AM
What's really ridiculous is the idea that if sex didn't feel good we would all die out.  Sure, we would have less 14 year olds having babies.  But adult comitted couples who wanted children would have sex to get pregnant once or twice, even if it was *painful*.  I'm just so tired of hearing that silly argument.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on January 04, 2010, 02:31:41 AM
What's really ridiculous is the idea that if sex didn't feel good we would all die out.  Sure, we would have less 14 year olds having babies.  But adult comitted couples who wanted children would have sex to get pregnant once or twice, even if it was *painful*.  I'm just so tired of hearing that silly argument.
MMMM sexy rocks.
Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: error on January 04, 2010, 02:32:27 AM
For married couples, the very IDEA of having sex is often painful.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on January 04, 2010, 10:55:54 AM
What's really ridiculous is the idea that if sex didn't feel good we would all die out.  Sure, we would have less 14 year olds having babies.  But adult comitted couples who wanted children would have sex to get pregnant once or twice, even if it was *painful*.  I'm just so tired of hearing that silly argument.

Perhaps in the here now, since we have evolved to understand sex.  How about when we crawled out the cave?  I doubt many cavemen would have drag\ged a woman behind a tree to fuck her if it hurt.
The argument is not silly.  You are thinking with modern blinders on.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: mikehz on January 04, 2010, 08:34:36 PM
For most of human existence, people made no connection betsween sex and babies.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on January 04, 2010, 08:37:06 PM
For most of human existence, people made no connection betsween sex and babies.
SHut up you! Siceynumac is tired of that silly argument.  You're wrong.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 04, 2010, 09:25:11 PM
What's really ridiculous is the idea that if sex didn't feel good we would all die out.  Sure, we would have less 14 year olds having babies.  But adult comitted couples who wanted children would have sex to get pregnant once or twice, even if it was *painful*.  I'm just so tired of hearing that silly argument.

Perhaps in the here now, since we have evolved to understand sex.  How about when we crawled out the cave?  I doubt many cavemen would have drag\ged a woman behind a tree to fuck her if it hurt.
The argument is not silly.  You are thinking with modern blinders on.


General comment...

The pleasure centers are reward mechanisms to imprint important life functions.  This is why food tastes good, the tongue is designed to reward nutritional intake - which we will die without, and the different specific tastes reward variety ensuring a nutritional balance.  This is why sex feels good, the body is designed to reward procreation. 

On the reverse, stimuli of pain are designed to protect the body and imprint damage/harm correlation.  Cold equals death, we freeze and begin to recognize harm as the blood moves to the core to protect the vitals.  Heat burns the flesh, we learn not to touch flames which will damage the body.  falling equals pain through blunt trauma, we gain control of our equilibrium and learn not to do that, which makes us more agile and capable of escaping danger.  The pain of childbirth imprints the protection mechanism making it seem important, which it is, and activates the short term memory so the mother doesn't simply walk away from a serious event.  Further pain of engorged breasts ensures the child will be used to drain them over a period of time where the offspring cannot fend for itself. 

This is pretty basic, and everyone knows it on basic levels but you never really hear it described in few words.  This pleasure pain thing is replicated through all of nature, and attaches to the other senses as well.  Beautiful, go after it.  Repulsive, avoid.  Smells bad, probably a danger sign.  Even if its just your armpits, its still telling you your hygiene is becoming a concern.  The problem lies in the visceral reward replication mechanism, people will do the pleasurable things over and over, and avoid the painful things even if they're mildly dis-comfortable.  Like work, where the reward is arguably worth less than the perceived pain of a repetitive task. 

So saying people would procreate if it was painful in the immediate act is fucking idiotic, because we're not designed that way biologically.  Pleasure through  pain is symptomatic of psychosis, negative self esteem, and whatever other shit drives self-harm from the subconscious through the conscious and emerges via physical acts of self destruction.  The babies that were born exclusively unto a humanoid race of self-mutilators over generations would burn out faster than a plague, and we would indeed become extinct no matter what tripped out little fantasies your bongsmoked head can conjure at Derp University. 
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: sillyperson on January 04, 2010, 09:30:17 PM
The problem lies in the visceral reward replication mechanism, people will do the pleasurable things over and over
Like, the kinds of things necessary to live to be 91, for example
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 04, 2010, 11:07:36 PM
The problem lies in the visceral reward replication mechanism, people will do the pleasurable things over and over
Like, the kinds of things necessary to live to be 91, for example

If destructive things don't undermine the necessities.  You've seen the cokemonkey button studies, I presume.  It all depends on the exposure to stimuli and strength thereof.  You can jack up the pleasure to erase anyones control, I don't care who they are. 
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on January 04, 2010, 11:52:03 PM
ahhhhh the power of pussy.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Brooklyn Red Leg on January 05, 2010, 03:35:47 AM
But there is no solution to this problem.....the pussy needs to be fucked, nice and HARD!

Sure there is. Stop circumcising baby boys and you won't have to slam your partner's head into the wall to get a fraction of the sensation you would normally get if your foreskin were intact. That's probably why sex for many men is not pleasurable because of our fucked up society and its need to lop off what evolution deigned to give us.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: sillyperson on January 05, 2010, 06:04:47 AM
You can jack up the pleasure
...
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 05, 2010, 10:50:00 AM
You can jack up the pleasure
...
  Helmut, turn up the pleasure on Herr Goddard.  Hm?  Yes, there we go.  How do you feel now, Herr Goddard. 

"Gffelmeebeesquee"

As I suspeckted. 
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on January 05, 2010, 11:47:57 AM
But there is no solution to this problem.....the pussy needs to be fucked, nice and HARD!

Sure there is. Stop circumcising baby boys and you won't have to slam your partner's head into the wall to get a fraction of the sensation you would normally get if your foreskin were intact. That's probably why sex for many men is not pleasurable because of our fucked up society and its need to lop off what evolution deigned to give us.

I'd agree, men who think sex is overrated more than likely don't experience much sensation in their mutilated genitalia (or low testosterone?).  Sad.  I got clipped but don't have that problem as I usually blow a load just looking at my woman's pussy.  Pre-hump chump I am and all.  Maybe Richard can give me some lessons.  Anyway,  I will not be mutilating my child if I have male offspring. 
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Dylboz on January 05, 2010, 09:34:35 PM
Maybe that wasn't the right term, how about overrated?

Hehe, go for a long time without them and they won't be as overrated. :P :wink: :mrgreen:

Hell, try being MARRIED and they won't seem overrated.

Funny, because it's so true. Fortunately, I'm marrying (my 2nd try) someone who has an even greater sex drive than me!
Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: gibson042 on January 05, 2010, 09:51:35 PM
This is pretty basic, and everyone knows it on basic levels but you never really hear it described in few words.  This pleasure pain thing is replicated through all of nature, and attaches to the other senses as well.  Beautiful, go after it.  Repulsive, avoid.  Smells bad, probably a danger sign.  Even if its just your armpits, its still telling you your hygiene is becoming a concern.

Statistically, people rate identical scents favorably if told they are cheese, and unfavorably if told they are feet.  Though I guess that's the exception proving the rule.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Lindsey on January 05, 2010, 11:31:14 PM
Maybe that wasn't the right term, how about overrated?

Hehe, go for a long time without them and they won't be as overrated. :P :wink: :mrgreen:

Hell, try being MARRIED and they won't seem overrated.

Funny, because it's so true. Fortunately, I'm marrying (my 2nd try) someone who has an even greater sex drive than me!

That's not always a good thing.  I seem to want more sex than Mr. Lindsey and I just end up cranky because I don't get it!
Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: error on January 05, 2010, 11:54:31 PM
Maybe you need more than one Mr., Lindsey.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Brooklyn Red Leg on January 06, 2010, 03:45:02 AM
I seem to want more sex than Mr. Lindsey and I just end up cranky because I don't get it!

Jesus Christ, why is it I never found women like you when I was younger?
Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: AL the Inconspicuous on January 06, 2010, 04:34:12 AM
[...]  Of course real tax resisters pleasure themselves into a jar of pennies to be used for future activism.  :roll:

"alex libman's jizz pennies" sound a lot worse than "ass pennies"  [...]

Actually tax resisters don't come across a lot of pennies, because local farmers' markets and flea markets usually price everything in integer amounts: 2 bunches for a dollar, that sorta thing.  And the long-term goal is to stop using fiat currency completely.

On a completely unrelated note, does ejaculating on a male IRS agent's defleshed skull make you gay?   :?

Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on January 06, 2010, 02:53:13 PM
[...]  Of course real tax resisters pleasure themselves into a jar of pennies to be used for future activism.  :roll:

"alex libman's jizz pennies" sound a lot worse than "ass pennies"  [...]

Actually tax resisters don't come across a lot of pennies, because local farmers' markets and flea markets usually price everything in integer amounts: 2 bunches for a dollar, that sorta thing.  And the long-term goal is to stop using fiat currency completely.

On a completely unrelated note, does ejaculating on a male IRS agent's defleshed skull make you gay?   :?

hard gay
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Lindsey on January 06, 2010, 11:25:49 PM
I seem to want more sex than Mr. Lindsey and I just end up cranky because I don't get it!

Jesus Christ, why is it I never found women like you when I was younger?

You don't want one like me.   :lol:
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: ForumTroll on January 06, 2010, 11:29:00 PM
I seem to want more sex than Mr. Lindsey and I just end up cranky because I don't get it!

Jesus Christ, why is it I never found women like you when I was younger?

You don't want one like me.   :lol:

Oh jeez, here we go again.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on January 06, 2010, 11:29:50 PM
again?
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: sillyperson on January 06, 2010, 11:37:52 PM
again?
Again.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on January 06, 2010, 11:47:15 PM
again?
Again.
Again?
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: spicynujac on January 07, 2010, 12:08:42 AM
Concerning the whole pleasure / pain argument, what about the immense pleasure that crack or heroin gives someone, which is supposedly greater than sex or anything else in the world?  Try to answer without calling anyone "idiotic".
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on January 07, 2010, 12:11:29 AM
never tried it but have to say
Pure MDMA
Front row at my favorite bands concert.
Fucking unreal.
Better than sex for sure.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on January 07, 2010, 12:11:51 AM
oh yeah, Idiot.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Brooklyn Red Leg on January 07, 2010, 01:41:16 AM
I seem to want more sex than Mr. Lindsey and I just end up cranky because I don't get it!

Jesus Christ, why is it I never found women like you when I was younger?

You don't want one like me.   :lol:

::snicker::
Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: AL the Inconspicuous on January 07, 2010, 05:41:30 AM
[...]  Of course real tax resisters pleasure themselves into a jar of pennies to be used for future activism.  :roll:

"alex libman's jizz pennies" sound a lot worse than "ass pennies"  [...]

Actually tax resisters don't come across a lot of pennies, because local farmers' markets and flea markets usually price everything in integer amounts: 2 bunches for a dollar, that sorta thing.  And the long-term goal is to stop using fiat currency completely.

On a completely unrelated note, does ejaculating on a male IRS agent's defleshed skull make you gay?   :?

hard gay

But female IRS agent skulls are much harder to come by, and the bones look the same.  Can't I just pretend?
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: inane on January 07, 2010, 11:28:22 AM
Quote
Funny, because it's so true. Fortunately, I'm marrying (my 2nd try) someone who has an even greater sex drive than me!

in other words, your marrying a woman.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 07, 2010, 11:43:09 PM
Concerning the whole pleasure / pain argument, what about the immense pleasure that crack or heroin gives someone, which is supposedly greater than sex or anything else in the world?  Try to answer without calling anyone "idiotic".

What about it? 

The whole question part of your question is missing, and adds a hilarious dimension to the second line in your statement. 
Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on January 08, 2010, 12:48:44 AM
[...]  Of course real tax resisters pleasure themselves into a jar of pennies to be used for future activism.  :roll:

"alex libman's jizz pennies" sound a lot worse than "ass pennies"  [...]

Actually tax resisters don't come across a lot of pennies, because local farmers' markets and flea markets usually price everything in integer amounts: 2 bunches for a dollar, that sorta thing.  And the long-term goal is to stop using fiat currency completely.

On a completely unrelated note, does ejaculating on a male IRS agent's defleshed skull make you gay?   :?

hard gay

But female IRS agent skulls are much harder to come by, and the bones look the same.  Can't I just pretend?


I'm sure you can find out where Sherry Jackson is being held, and repeatedly skullfuck her.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: AL the Inconspicuous on January 08, 2010, 01:09:02 AM
Does Sherry Jackson (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherry_Jackson) work for the IRS?  :?
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: spicynujac on January 08, 2010, 01:13:35 AM
Earlier in the thread someone brought up the point that things that are pleasurable are biologically "good" and things that are painful are biologically "bad".  However, the use of certain hallucinogins and hard narcotics would seem to contradict this, as they can cause immense pleasure but are also extremely harmful to the body and mind.
Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: AL the Inconspicuous on January 08, 2010, 01:41:28 AM
The human body evolved to function under certain natural parameters.

The human mind evolved to the point of being able to hack its environment, including its own body, far beyond what nature had originally intended.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 08, 2010, 02:50:40 AM
Earlier in the thread someone brought up the point that things that are pleasurable are biologically "good" and things that are painful are biologically "bad".  However, the use of certain hallucinogins and hard narcotics would seem to contradict this, as they can cause immense pleasure but are also extremely harmful to the body and mind.

The pleasure centers can be fooled.  Thats what drugs do.  They are unnatural, in the sense that they bring no nutrients into the body.  The reward mechanisms are primarily to do exactly that, to reward. 

The effect of psychoactive drugs is actually supposed to be a preventative device in nature, like a poison, which discourages consumption by herbivores.  This allows the plant to reproduce if its inedible in quantities.  By coincidence, this "poison" happens to be attractive in smaller quantities and brings pleasure stimulus.  If you were to eat enough to make a meal, you would be severely incapacitated, and likely not attempt it again.  Nature knows nothing of using fire on it, or rendering the shit into needle form. 

So the drugs actually do work as intended by nature.  It is we who have circumvented the laws of nature and found ways to introduce the substances in pleasurable, smaller quantities. 

By introducing pleasure with unnatural means, and gaining no nutritional value in the process, it becomes recreational.  Recreational activities are supposed to be secondary, after maintaining health and the necessary living skills.  If they rise in rank and become a primary activity, other things slip, like hygiene and social stability, mental alacrity, and the means of self-sufficiency like work, or its older reflection of hunting/gathering. 

People will obviously rally around the argument of pot being natural and edible.  And this is true.  But if you ate a whole bowl full like a regular salad, you'd be sick as a fucking dog, flat on your back.  Thats the benchmark, in a nutshell, and what proves its a recreational substance.  You're supposed to be able to eat as much as you want and the pleasure is supposed to be an absence of hunger, craving of nutrition satisfied.  Since you have to be careful about how much you ingest, and know it will have an intoxicating effect, it is to be recognized as a potentially harmful substance. 

And believe me, I like pot, and most drugs.  But my pro-arguments aren't so amateurish as the common fuckhead.  Recreational use of intoxicants and psychedelics open some wonderful doors of perception, bring many positive introspective and creative things into the mind of the user, and society as a whole.  They provide escapism from the mundane, and enjoyment if used properly.  But only if they are kept in the proper #2 position, secondary and not primary, and used responsibly. 

Of course, we'd probably have better luck with that if they weren't so taboo and treated by youth as a forbidden fruit, which promotes irresponsible use/abuse that paves the way to addiction in adults. 
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Kevin Freeheart on January 08, 2010, 04:26:18 AM
Quote
By introducing pleasure with unnatural means, and gaining no nutritional value in the process, it becomes recreational.

Okay, so my instinct (see what I did there?) to rant and rave has ebbed.

FUCK. YOU.

The human capacity to reason, to manipulate and to change is NATURAL.

Take your "unnatural" shit and shove it.

How's that for ya?
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 08, 2010, 05:35:03 AM
Quote
By introducing pleasure with unnatural means, and gaining no nutritional value in the process, it becomes recreational.

Okay, so my instinct (see what I did there?) to rant and rave has ebbed.

FUCK. YOU.

The human capacity to reason, to manipulate and to change is NATURAL.

Take your "unnatural" shit and shove it.

How's that for ya?

Kevin Dean is incapable of reading entire POST.

FAIL
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 08, 2010, 05:43:24 AM

Quote from post where Kevin Dean fails. 


Quote
Recreational use of intoxicants and psychedelics open some wonderful doors of perception, bring many positive introspective and creative things into the mind of the user, and society as a whole.  They provide escapism from the mundane, and enjoyment if used properly.  But only if they are kept in the proper #2 position, secondary and not primary, and used responsibly.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Kevin Freeheart on January 08, 2010, 08:11:13 AM
Hey Drifter, seriously, do I know you in person?

I could poke fun and tug your chain all day, but if you're someone I know, I'd love to do it in person.

Dude... I'm drunk... I'm trolling... It's all in good fun. This is an internet forum. I think I've posted enough here that people know when I'm being serious and not. Unless your Denis Goddard... then you just suck. :P
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on January 08, 2010, 12:13:51 PM
Great post drifter.  Moderation is a key point to follow in all aspects of life.  As the stand-up comedian Doug Stanhope said, "theres only two type of people who don't like drugs, those never tried them and those that really fucking sucked at doing them."

[youtube=425,350] <object width="660" height="525"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/59YAUNBfmaM&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/59YAUNBfmaM&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="660" height="525"></embed></object>[/youtube]

Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Rillion on January 08, 2010, 12:18:48 PM
Great post drifter.  Moderation is a key point to follow in all aspects of life.  As the stand-up comedian Doug Stanhope said, "theres only two type of people who don't like drugs, those never tried them and those that really fucking sucked at doing them."

This is mean of me and I know it, but my boyfriend's brother has a girlfriend who is....not too bright, to put it charitably.  The other night we were talking about drugs, and she said she didn't like LSD because it really messes with her head.  I couldn't help but think that there was a connection there.  The only people I've talked to who dislike LSD for that reason have been pretty dim. 
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on January 08, 2010, 12:39:10 PM
Confronted your own ego is a humbling experience to say the least.  Last night my wife was watching some show on discovery/tlc/history channel where this guy goes into the amazon and lives with Brazilians.  Some episodes he cuts down rain forests, some he works with cocoa farmers, etc. 
Well this episode he wanted to have the shaman experience with some hallucinogen they drink.  The first time he didn't do enough and was in essence calling bullshit on the vision quest experience.   So he went to a different shaman, one known to make a wicked strong brew.  He tripped balls and commented on how he kept battling his ego and having to confront how ugly he was on the inside.  He got mind-fucked. 
Rillion I'm sure the girl you are talking about had some truthful/insightful experience she'd rather not be privy to.  Ignorance is bliss to some people.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Lindsey on January 09, 2010, 12:47:17 AM
Have they invented Viagra for women yet? 
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: ForumTroll on January 09, 2010, 12:53:50 AM
Have they invented Viagra for women yet? 

Yes, it's called a new credit card.
Title: Re: Re: Sex
Post by: mike the godless heathen on January 09, 2010, 07:01:06 AM
Have they invented Viagra for women yet? 

i believe it is just called rape.

the vag will lubricate itself. eventually.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: fatcat on January 09, 2010, 09:15:26 AM
Have they invented Viagra for women yet?  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrinsa (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrinsa)

Quote
However, in December 2004 the United States the 14-member Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee, plus voting consultants, for Reproductive Health Drugs unanimously rejected Procter and Gamble's fast-track request for Intrinsa citing concerns about off-label use.

LOL

puritanism FTL
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on January 09, 2010, 10:12:27 AM
Does Sherry Jackson (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherry_Jackson) work for the IRS?  :?

Wrong one. She doesn't have a Wiki article but she was in America: Freedom to Fascism.