Umm, this isn't an action flick...Also, there are lines of boldness: the initial offer to Mulligan by Galt, the "my goal is to make money" line by Rearden, and a few more. My vote is hypercritical.
The book had a lot of action in it and all movies are action flicks to some extent. What I mean by that is the medium is particularly visual, obviously compared to a book but even more so than a play where your settings and effects are very limited. You will always hear film types say to show it, don't say it. Less dialogue, more stuph going on on the screen. This book in particular may be a challenge because it's full of characters monologing for several pages straight.
FWIW though, I didn't realize the movie was in three parts when I wrote those first two comments. There is a lot less action in the first thirdish of the book as it ramps up very slowly. Unfortunately, this is the movie that needs to grab people and make them want to see the other two. And I caught that line and that it was supposed to be one of those bold lines but it's also part of what made me feel unimpressed with the acting. These people aren't selling themselves to me as bold and daring titans of industry.
It's only two minutes. Maybe the movie will be better than the trailer makes it look. It's just not looking optimistic because the trailer should have some of the best shots from the movie. But there will be better opportunities for the actors to prove me wrong. This trailer is not going to be very effective except when preaching to the choir, IMHO.