The Free Talk Live BBS

Free Talk Live => General => Topic started by: KonaBoy on June 04, 2008, 09:16:45 PM

Title: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: KonaBoy on June 04, 2008, 09:16:45 PM
Welcome aboard, Whitney!  :D

A liberty lover AND a redhead?!  Are you taking applications? lol

Best of luck in NH, I hope to be there ASAP after I'm done with college.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Taors on June 05, 2008, 04:13:32 AM
(http://freetalklive.com/images/whitney.jpg)

I dunno. I'm still undecided. :?
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Porcupine_in_MA on June 05, 2008, 10:21:25 AM
Although I'm not a big fan of freckles I still think shes hot.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Lindsey on June 05, 2008, 11:35:05 PM
I'm not knocking Whitney, because I think she's beautiful - but I'm beginning to think you guys find pretty much everyone attractive. 
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: BonerJoe on June 05, 2008, 11:46:25 PM
/me bulldozes enough room for at least 15 pages of this thread.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Porcupine_in_MA on June 06, 2008, 12:17:19 AM
I'm not knocking Whitney, because I think she's beautiful - but I'm beginning to think you guys find pretty much everyone attractive. 

I definitely don't find everyone attractive.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Lindsey on June 06, 2008, 12:28:38 AM
I'm not knocking Whitney, because I think she's beautiful - but I'm beginning to think you guys find pretty much everyone attractive. 

I definitely don't find everyone attractive.

I really do wonder about some of you.   :?
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: BonerJoe on June 06, 2008, 12:35:18 AM
I'm not knocking Whitney, because I think she's beautiful - but I'm beginning to think you guys find pretty much everyone attractive. 

I definitely don't find everyone attractive.

Hey, baby.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Taors on June 06, 2008, 12:57:36 AM
I'm not knocking Whitney, because I think she's beautiful - but I'm beginning to think you guys find pretty much everyone attractive. 

I definitely don't find everyone attractive.

But you wouldn't mind having your dick inbetween those hot freckled tits?
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: KonaBoy on June 06, 2008, 09:40:58 AM
I'm not knocking Whitney, because I think she's beautiful - but I'm beginning to think you guys find pretty much everyone attractive. 
I'm just a fan of red hair and freckles...and the lady being a liberty-lover is always a plus and should compensate for any lack of subjective values.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Porcupine_in_MA on June 06, 2008, 09:54:02 AM
Hey, baby.

Except for big, buck, negroids like Jay.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: YixilTesiphon on June 06, 2008, 11:19:11 PM
I'm not knocking Whitney, because I think she's beautiful - but I'm beginning to think you guys find pretty much everyone attractive. 
I'm just a fan of red hair and freckles...and the lady being a liberty-lover is always a plus and should compensate for any lack of subjective values.

You'd do Kat Kanning?
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: KonaBoy on June 07, 2008, 12:01:34 AM
I'm not knocking Whitney, because I think she's beautiful - but I'm beginning to think you guys find pretty much everyone attractive. 
I'm just a fan of red hair and freckles...and the lady being a liberty-lover is always a plus and should compensate for any lack of subjective values.

You'd do Kat Kanning?

"do"?

How old are you?  13?
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Lindsey on June 07, 2008, 12:12:36 AM
I'm not knocking Whitney, because I think she's beautiful - but I'm beginning to think you guys find pretty much everyone attractive. 
I'm just a fan of red hair and freckles...and the lady being a liberty-lover is always a plus and should compensate for any lack of subjective values.

You'd do Kat Kanning?

Ouch. 
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Taors on June 07, 2008, 12:27:04 AM
I'm not knocking Whitney, because I think she's beautiful - but I'm beginning to think you guys find pretty much everyone attractive. 
I'm just a fan of red hair and freckles...and the lady being a liberty-lover is always a plus and should compensate for any lack of subjective values.

You'd do Kat Kanning?

"do"?

How old are you?  13?

Do is a legitimate verb denoting sexual intercourse. I'd do Kat Kanning if she gave me a million dollars. Hell, you could have sex with her and not have to worry about any consequences from Russell (he said on FTL when he was co-hosting that if a rapist were raping his wife right in front of him, he wouldn't lift a finger to help her because it would be considered violence).
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: hellbilly on June 07, 2008, 12:51:22 AM
Do is a legitimate verb denoting sexual intercourse. I'd do Kat Kanning if she gave me a million dollars. Hell, you could have sex with her and not have to worry about any consequences from Russell (he said on FTL when he was co-hosting that if a rapist were raping his wife right in front of him, he wouldn't lift a finger to help her because it would be considered violence).

He didn't really say that did he?

(uh oh. Sorry for the hijack Whitney. But to get back on topic, I would "do" you too. :) )
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Evil Muppet on June 07, 2008, 01:35:13 AM
Do is a legitimate verb denoting sexual intercourse. I'd do Kat Kanning if she gave me a million dollars. Hell, you could have sex with her and not have to worry about any consequences from Russell (he said on FTL when he was co-hosting that if a rapist were raping his wife right in front of him, he wouldn't lift a finger to help her because it would be considered violence).

Doesn't he carry a gun?
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Taors on June 07, 2008, 04:10:42 AM
Do is a legitimate verb denoting sexual intercourse. I'd do Kat Kanning if she gave me a million dollars. Hell, you could have sex with her and not have to worry about any consequences from Russell (he said on FTL when he was co-hosting that if a rapist were raping his wife right in front of him, he wouldn't lift a finger to help her because it would be considered violence).

He didn't really say that did he?

(uh oh. Sorry for the hijack Whitney. But to get back on topic, I would "do" you too. :) )

Swear to fucking god. He was co-hosting that night. He's only co-hosted a couple of times, and I remember him saying that clearly. Someone called in and asked him if he would commit violence in self-defense, and he said no. Then the person asked him if someone was raping his wife, IN HIS HOUSE, right in front of him, if he would fight off the attacker, he still said no. Jay remembers, and can back that craziness up.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: BonerJoe on June 07, 2008, 04:14:43 AM
Do is a legitimate verb denoting sexual intercourse. I'd do Kat Kanning if she gave me a million dollars. Hell, you could have sex with her and not have to worry about any consequences from Russell (he said on FTL when he was co-hosting that if a rapist were raping his wife right in front of him, he wouldn't lift a finger to help her because it would be considered violence).

Doesn't he carry a gun?

His "religion" doesn't allow him to.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Porcupine_in_MA on June 07, 2008, 11:37:37 AM
Yeah, he would just hire me to blow you away.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Hologene Relapse on June 07, 2008, 11:44:35 AM
Woo she has red eye brows. I use to have red eye brows, but they're blonde now. :(

-- Brede
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: BonerJoe on June 07, 2008, 02:01:36 PM
Yeah, he would just hire me to blow you away.

I should fuck you in the ass just for saying that.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Porcupine_in_MA on June 07, 2008, 02:13:22 PM
Yeah, he would just hire me to blow you away.

I should fuck you in the ass just for saying that.

Faggot
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: BonerJoe on June 07, 2008, 02:20:57 PM
Yeah, he would just hire me to blow you away.

I should fuck you in the ass just for saying that.

Faggot

That's a hate crime right there, sir. I'm calling Brad Jarvis on your ass.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Porcupine_in_MA on June 07, 2008, 02:22:27 PM
I'm sorry, I'm not into cops fucking me in my ass either.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: BonerJoe on June 07, 2008, 02:27:33 PM
I'm sorry, I'm not into cops fucking me in my ass either.


Well, Brad doesn't really WANT to fuck you in the ass, but it's his job.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Porcupine_in_MA on June 07, 2008, 02:37:22 PM
Brad Jarvis?

(http://www.adult-sex-toys-store.com/gay-adult-catalog/dvds/features/gay-adult-catalog/dvds/features/wild-cops-dvd-big.jpg)
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Stobrawa on June 07, 2008, 02:55:55 PM
I'm not knocking Whitney, because I think she's beautiful - but I'm beginning to think you guys find pretty much everyone attractive. 

yes.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: milcop2008 on June 07, 2008, 04:23:00 PM
If he said that, he's a fucking idiot.


Whitney looks hot in her photo, considering how people photograph, she's probably very attractive in person.  Snapshots are the worst way to determine attractiveness.  The viewer gets to scrutinize an amateurish shot, with flash and too much subject int he frame, the white shirt and dark background fucks with your overall impression. 

She is approximately 25 to 27 years old, 135 nlbs, maybe 140, 5'9'' and works as a whitecollar professional or a waitress in a mid to upscale dining establishment.  Not married, from a catholic background but probably agnostic with an observance of calendar holidays, also a non-smoker and sporting big C's or small D's - and I'm leaning to guess those are natural titties.  She doesn't wear much makeup because its hard t blend, had a hoop in her left eyebrow but no longer wears it and has most likely had her navel done, maybe more -- but probably no tattoos.  The blue eyes are natural, and she has at least one brother and one sister.  Finally, she gets her snatch waxed in the summer, or shaves, but keeps a landing strip because she's all red and likes to prove it. 



You must work for the FBI with that profiler shit! You did a better job than me.. Then again I'm just a cop :lol: On the other hand, I'd love to get a chance with her! It's not the freclkles or the red hair; it's hot tho, it's just the fact that the possiblity that I can have an intelluctal convrosation with her before getting into the sack.. that really turns me on! Call me gay, but intelligence is the biggest turn on for me!
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: BonerJoe on June 07, 2008, 06:01:11 PM
Brad Jarvis?

(http://www.adult-sex-toys-store.com/gay-adult-catalog/dvds/features/gay-adult-catalog/dvds/features/wild-cops-dvd-big.jpg)

Damn, he has tits.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: DogCow on June 07, 2008, 09:59:09 PM
If he said that, he's a fucking idiot.


Whitney looks hot in her photo, considering how people photograph, she's probably very attractive in person.  Snapshots are the worst way to determine attractiveness.  The viewer gets to scrutinize an amateurish shot, with flash and too much subject int he frame, the white shirt and dark background fucks with your overall impression. 

She is approximately 25 to 27 years old, 135 nlbs, maybe 140, 5'9'' and works as a whitecollar professional or a waitress in a mid to upscale dining establishment.  Not married, from a catholic background but probably agnostic with an observance of calendar holidays, also a non-smoker and sporting big C's or small D's - and I'm leaning to guess those are natural titties.  She doesn't wear much makeup because its hard t blend, had a hoop in her left eyebrow but no longer wears it and has most likely had her navel done, maybe more -- but probably no tattoos.  The blue eyes are natural, and she has at least one brother and one sister.  Finally, she gets her snatch waxed in the summer, or shaves, but keeps a landing strip because she's all red and likes to prove it. 




You're killing me here.  Whitney is SO attractive because she has all those freckles and the red hair.  I thought that she might be older, but as you mentioned photographs, especially with a flash, are a poor way to get a good grip on appearances.  What is really "hot" is her red eyebrows... and again as you have pointed out we know what that means... yes, she's sexy all over.  As Springsteen wrote "Your life's been wasted 'till you've got' down on your knees and tasted a Red Headed woman".

What a beauty!
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: hellbilly on June 07, 2008, 10:59:07 PM
If he said that, he's a fucking idiot.


Whitney looks hot in her photo, considering how people photograph, she's probably very attractive in person.  Snapshots are the worst way to determine attractiveness.  The viewer gets to scrutinize an amateurish shot, with flash and too much subject int he frame, the white shirt and dark background fucks with your overall impression. 

She is approximately 25 to 27 years old, 135 nlbs, maybe 140, 5'9'' and works as a whitecollar professional or a waitress in a mid to upscale dining establishment.  Not married, from a catholic background but probably agnostic with an observance of calendar holidays, also a non-smoker and sporting big C's or small D's - and I'm leaning to guess those are natural titties.  She doesn't wear much makeup because its hard t blend, had a hoop in her left eyebrow but no longer wears it and has most likely had her navel done, maybe more -- but probably no tattoos.  The blue eyes are natural, and she has at least one brother and one sister.  Finally, she gets her snatch waxed in the summer, or shaves, but keeps a landing strip because she's all red and likes to prove it. 

Now that would be a fun game- good stuff :)

What do de winnah gets ?
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: timmysoboy on June 07, 2008, 11:03:24 PM
(http://freetalklive.com/images/whitney.jpg)

IDK, I'd probably tap that.  I sorta got a max-out on the freckles though, so IDK.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Lindsey on June 08, 2008, 12:37:25 AM
I'm not knocking Whitney, because I think she's beautiful - but I'm beginning to think you guys find pretty much everyone attractive. 

yes.


At least you're honest.  +1
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Taors on June 08, 2008, 11:31:43 AM
Holy shit it's Whitney Shitney! :lol:
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: YixilTesiphon on June 08, 2008, 01:00:20 PM
I'm not knocking Whitney, because I think she's beautiful - but I'm beginning to think you guys find pretty much everyone attractive. 
I'm just a fan of red hair and freckles...and the lady being a liberty-lover is always a plus and should compensate for any lack of subjective values.

You'd do Kat Kanning?

"do"?

How old are you?  13?

You just got upset over pointless shit, so I'm going to take that as a yes.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: NHArticleTen on June 08, 2008, 02:19:13 PM
Do is a legitimate verb denoting sexual intercourse. I'd do Kat Kanning if she gave me a million dollars. Hell, you could have sex with her and not have to worry about any consequences from Russell (he said on FTL when he was co-hosting that if a rapist were raping his wife right in front of him, he wouldn't lift a finger to help her because it would be considered violence).

He didn't really say that did he?

(uh oh. Sorry for the hijack Whitney. But to get back on topic, I would "do" you too. :) )

Swear to fucking god. He was co-hosting that night. He's only co-hosted a couple of times, and I remember him saying that clearly. Someone called in and asked him if he would commit violence in self-defense, and he said no. Then the person asked him if someone was raping his wife, IN HIS HOUSE, right in front of him, if he would fight off the attacker, he still said no. Jay remembers, and can back that craziness up.

Meh...
Over a year ago I asked them what they would do if half a dozen cops were gang-banging Kira...

They refused to answer and thought it was terrible that I would pose that scenario since Kira reads the forums...

I thought it was important for Kira to know who she could count on...and who...not so much...

So...as the situation stands...they'll get a free ride from Russell or Kat...but I'll still defend Kira...

[youtube=425,350]v/b1RvTJBdRuA[/youtube]

It's for the children after all...





-nevertheend-

Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: KonaBoy on June 08, 2008, 02:21:22 PM
I'm not knocking Whitney, because I think she's beautiful - but I'm beginning to think you guys find pretty much everyone attractive. 
I'm just a fan of red hair and freckles...and the lady being a liberty-lover is always a plus and should compensate for any lack of subjective values.

You'd do Kat Kanning?

"do"?

How old are you?  13?

You just got upset over pointless shit, so I'm going to take that as a yes.
I guess I just didn't expect this forum to be inundated with guys who either talk like horny 13 year olds with something to prove or creepy old guys writing detailed sexual profiles of women based on their pictures. 
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: YixilTesiphon on June 08, 2008, 05:09:53 PM
I'm not knocking Whitney, because I think she's beautiful - but I'm beginning to think you guys find pretty much everyone attractive. 
I'm just a fan of red hair and freckles...and the lady being a liberty-lover is always a plus and should compensate for any lack of subjective values.

You'd do Kat Kanning?

"do"?

How old are you?  13?

You just got upset over pointless shit, so I'm going to take that as a yes.
I guess I just didn't expect this forum to be inundated with guys who either talk like horny 13 year olds with something to prove or creepy old guys writing detailed sexual profiles of women based on their pictures. 

The Internet is SERIOUS FUCKING BUSINESS.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Taors on June 08, 2008, 07:16:46 PM
I'm not knocking Whitney, because I think she's beautiful - but I'm beginning to think you guys find pretty much everyone attractive. 
I'm just a fan of red hair and freckles...and the lady being a liberty-lover is always a plus and should compensate for any lack of subjective values.

You'd do Kat Kanning?

"do"?

How old are you?  13?

You just got upset over pointless shit, so I'm going to take that as a yes.
I guess I just didn't expect this forum to be inundated with guys who either talk like horny 13 year olds with something to prove or creepy old guys writing detailed sexual profiles of women based on their pictures. 

Then you expected incorrectly.
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: error on June 16, 2008, 06:52:19 PM
Yes, but the question everyone wants answered is: Are you a lesbian or not?!?
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Porcupine_in_MA on June 16, 2008, 09:44:59 PM
How much you wanna bet "bi-curious"...
Title: Re: New Shriner - Whitney
Post by: Dubly Sure on September 29, 2009, 12:31:16 AM
It's wierd that everyone is so worked up about a female listener. I love women but who cares?

-D