Can you please define "free market" as you are using it?
It sounds like you don't think a free market is possible.
You're right in the sense that I don't believe in some sort of utopia where there will be no crime. Like I said earlier, I doubt we'll ever live in a world completely free of crime, either traditional or the more organized and efficient government form. But we can have a
freer market than we have now.
I think you're playing dumb, but I'll play along for now and dumb it down for you. Freedom and crime are antitheses of each other. What is regulation if not thinly-veiled threats of violence? We can pretend you have choices W, X, Y, and Z while I'm pointing a gun at you and saying "If you do X or Y I'll kill you, but I'll let you do W or Z". That's government regulation in a nutshell and it's simply a form of violence.
To me, the free market has nothing to do with NAP, or crime. It just means a market with no regulations placed on it. In a free market, I could hire someone to commit crimes for me.
Then you don't understand what freedom is. See above. You arbitrarily distinguish between governments that regulate and other violent criminal organizations (the defining delusion of minarchism), but governments are just a flavor of crime that works really well. If you're hiring someone to do crime, that's not fitting with my definition of a free market. A free market is voluntary exchange absent force or fraud. I happen to think we'll all be able to combat such activities a lot better when we stop being deluded that the government form of crime is protecting us from more traditional notions of crime. That would be a
freer market than what we have now but crime won't just vanish and get replaced by utopia as people figure out how stupid an idea minarchy is. It will just speed up our evolution as we realize we have to start experimenting with rational solutions for crime.