When Farah gets it wrong he really gets it wrong! He certainly is no Chuck Baldwin.
Has he not caught on that a vast majority of so called Anarchist activity are government agent-provocateurs? They have been caught at it time and time again, and are always present at the G20's. Has he not yet learned that when government fears something that they infiltrate and smear or neuter the organization?
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it." - Lenin
They have done this with John Burchers, the militia, the civil rights movement, the anti war movement, the Tea Party, the Libertarian Party, and recently the Anarchists. They have been so sucessful with smearing the concept of the militia and classical liberalism (libertarianism) that one of the brothers at my church uses those 2 words in what often sounds as if they were 4 letter words. He speaks the same way about Anarchy and so does Joseph Farah.
In the case of Anarchy first of all they both fail to separate the political philosophy from things such as violence, which is a strategy NOT a political philosophy and is a distinct and separate thing. Also his violence is most often the manifestation of government agent provocateurs or funded groups.
There are many mainstem organizations that are Anarchist in nature though they do not use the term because it has been so vilified. Lew Rockwell and Strike the Root are both anarchist sites. Henry David Thoreau and Lysander Spooner were both strongly in the Anarchist camp.
From reading Farahs article ("no rules, no police, no authority") it is clear that he does not even understand what anarchy is. (The lack of people that have a monopoly on power and will kill you if you don't do everything that they say - a government.)
In closing it just upsets me when I see Farah do the handiwork of the New World Order. We need every Patriot that we can get.
Be Blessed
Joe