The Free Talk Live BBS

Free Talk Live => General => Topic started by: Fred on September 27, 2011, 05:20:19 PM

Title: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Fred on September 27, 2011, 05:20:19 PM
So, am I in danger of being banned?  Like Dragline?  Can I be candid on this board or not?  Is it my language?

If I say punk instead of asshole - is that okay?

Just checking cuz I know you expect honesty from participants...

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9PfrbScLi0[/youtube]
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Turd Ferguson on September 27, 2011, 05:26:46 PM
I'd just follow the golden rule............

On days that end in "ay", use the word asshole. Otherwise, use the word punk.

I'm not speaking for Shaw, thats just what I'd suggest.
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Fred on September 27, 2011, 05:28:47 PM
I'd just follow the golden rule............

On days that end in "ay", use the word asshole. Otherwise, use the word punk.

I'm not speaking for Shaw, thats just what I'd suggest.

you really crack me up Mike.
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Turd Ferguson on September 27, 2011, 05:37:08 PM
I'd just follow the golden rule............

On days that end in "ay", use the word asshole. Otherwise, use the word punk.

I'm not speaking for Shaw, thats just what I'd suggest.

you really crack me up Mike.

I love you Fred.

Not in no homo kinda way either, so dont get any bright ideas.
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: John Shaw on September 27, 2011, 05:43:05 PM
Actually, this thread puts you more on the road to bannination than the comments that were reported.

And that would make you .0000125% chance more likely to be banned today than yesterday.

In addition to the .00000252% chance increase you earned from dissing me for where I choose to let my cats sleep.

YOU'RE ON THE ROAD TO FUCKING RUIN
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Fred on September 27, 2011, 05:44:05 PM
you need to get those cats outta your bed man...

and, I hate when people say "you need"  so, I think you should get em outta there...
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: John Shaw on September 27, 2011, 05:46:51 PM
you need to get those cats outta your bed man...

None of your fuckin' business where my cats sleep.

You superstitious or some shit?
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Fred on September 27, 2011, 05:48:22 PM
You got me there - ain't nobody's business but your own!
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: John Shaw on September 27, 2011, 05:51:09 PM
<<<Still trying to figure out why you have a no catbed policy.

CATBED: THE BED FOR CATS.

(http://www.palomartheband.com/final-bed-cat.jpg)
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: John Shaw on September 27, 2011, 05:52:31 PM
(http://venetiancat.com/CATS/Bed-of-Cat.jpg)
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: John Shaw on September 27, 2011, 05:52:56 PM
(http://www.lisascats.com/images/Cats%20on%20Bed%20043.jpg)
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: John Shaw on September 27, 2011, 05:53:31 PM
(http://www.wildbell.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/3gatos.jpg)
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: John Shaw on September 27, 2011, 05:54:14 PM
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_3uCNWp1jSh4/S66lMPToLYI/AAAAAAAACOQ/Yt2xCLlX_TU/s1600/IMG_0246.JPG)
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: John Shaw on September 27, 2011, 05:54:40 PM
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_3uCNWp1jSh4/S6pqMEUhsAI/AAAAAAAACOA/45Ze7GLmwpU/s1600/IMG_0245.JPG)
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: John Shaw on September 27, 2011, 05:57:20 PM
Aw shit son

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_n1Jgy6WlY9E/TSKLJOgBP5I/AAAAAAAAMuE/KUcpc0Gs6zI/s1600/tigerbed.jpg)
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: John Shaw on September 27, 2011, 05:57:49 PM
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/02/08/article-0-0D17345C000005DC-85_634x434.jpg)
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: John Shaw on September 27, 2011, 05:58:30 PM
(http://i1-news.softpedia-static.com/images/news2/Teen-Felicia-Frisco-Sleeps-with-Bengal-Tiger-in-Bed-2.jpg)
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Bill Brasky on September 28, 2011, 06:42:36 AM
I'll have you know, I happen to own the most beautiful cat in the world.

Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Turd Ferguson on September 28, 2011, 09:20:00 AM
I'll have you know, I happen to own the most beautiful cat in the world.



You never really own a cat.

At least they dont think so.

But its beautiful ya say? Eyes sparkle like the Nile?
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Fred on September 29, 2011, 07:43:12 PM
Mr. Clean Up Man, I never said thanks for outing Mr. Truth....


Thanks!
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Bill Brasky on September 29, 2011, 11:20:11 PM
I'll have you know, I happen to own the most beautiful cat in the world.



You never really own a cat.

At least they dont think so.

But its beautiful ya say? Eyes sparkle like the Nile?

"Owning" is the inside joke, and the other being "the most beautiful cat in the world".  Subjective.  

But yes, in fact, I do.

(http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/3383/salemw.jpg)

Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Bill Brasky on September 29, 2011, 11:45:35 PM
Mr. Clean Up Man, I never said thanks for outing Mr. Truth....


Thanks!

I was just instructing Mr Truth on how to properly use the "report to mod" feature.  I can't help if he got his feelings hurt.

Transparency goes a long way on keeping people civil.

Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Peppermint Pig on September 30, 2011, 12:31:18 AM
CATS OR DEATH!!!
(Grab the popcorn and enjoy!)

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDe2Mgh25Wc[/youtube]
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 01, 2011, 12:18:25 AM
This interests me...

Why are some YouTube vids only allowed to be ten minutes long, and then theres these oddball movie-length fellas?

Like, what the fuck?
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: John Shaw on October 01, 2011, 01:13:30 AM
This interests me...

Why are some YouTube vids only allowed to be ten minutes long, and then theres these oddball movie-length fellas?

Like, what the fuck?

Once upon a time you could get a "Director's account" that had no time limits.

Those days are gone but the old accounts still get to exist.

Also some prod companies make dealios still I think.
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: BonerJoe on October 01, 2011, 01:31:38 AM
You can post 15 minute videos by default.

At Youtube's discretion, you can be upgraded.

My account has been. And I never was a director.
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 01, 2011, 03:39:39 AM

Hi, both.

That'd be cool to be able to post 2hr YouTube vids. 

It makes me want to become one. 

Funny part is, I've never once posted a YouTube vid. 


Let's carry on, then.  Mindless ramblins satisfied.

Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Turd Ferguson on October 03, 2011, 10:34:02 AM
I'll have you know, I happen to own the most beautiful cat in the world.



You never really own a cat.

At least they dont think so.

But its beautiful ya say? Eyes sparkle like the Nile?

"Owning" is the inside joke, and the other being "the most beautiful cat in the world".  Subjective.  

But yes, in fact, I do.

(http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/3383/salemw.jpg)



Reminds me of John Belushi, doing the raised eyebrow thing.
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: mikehz on October 03, 2011, 02:07:52 PM
Cats always have that look like, "If I were just a few pounds bigger, you'd be dinner."
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Lindsey on October 04, 2011, 11:12:26 PM
Lots of people let their pets sleep in bed with them.  If they don't have allergy issues, I don't see the problem...
Title: Re: John Shaw ban criteria
Post by: Fred on October 05, 2011, 08:41:48 PM
I don't want any animal asshole near my face - sleeping or not!

Only intelligent folks let cats sleep in their beds .... we dummies don't!