Oh Christ.
Yes, he sounds like a politician, but he has to sound that way to get votes. At least Herman Cain has a business background with a variety of companies and the Federal Reserve branch, Kansas City.
Ok, I don't like his social conservative message, but's that's not part of the executive branch. Maybe the realm of the Supreme Court.
I still like the guy and for now, next to Ron Paul, I'm pushing Cain.
You wouldn't say "voting is for suckers" if Ron Paul were ahead in the polls.
You wouldn't say "voting is for suckers" if Ron Paul were ahead in the polls.(http://www.learnamericanenglishonline.com/images/boy%20at%20movies%20eat%20popcorn.jpg)
I want Jimmy Carter to run again, after the collapse at least he can do the White House maintenance himself.
You wouldn't say "voting is for suckers" if Ron Paul were ahead in the polls.
You wouldn't say "voting is for suckers" if Ron Paul were ahead in the polls.
You're goddamned right I would.
Ron Paul is a crabby old pro life, anti immigration has-been.
Being the most moral member of mafia is still being in the mafia. Ron Paul is in the mafia.
As for voting - I'm not even registered, I can't walk into the polls while carrying, and I won't go into buildings without a firearm unless I have no choice. No way, no how.
One man can't change the world. If one man could change the world I'd be arguing for a dictatorship rather than a free society.
Ron Paul won't save you.
(http://chattypics.com/download.php?file=RonPaulJesus_zn2a0gfuus2b90egcv2d.jpg)
Does anyone else find Herman Cain about the most refreshing politician in the past 20 years or so?
And I think he's the man to beat Obama. I've been following him and writing about him on my website "The DeAnna Review."
I suspect most readers here like Ron Paul, and I do to. But if Paul fails, Cain is a great backup. Or a Paul-Cain team?
He's meant as a positive step for freedom in the US.
He's meant as a positive step for freedom in the US.
He won't be. What he'll be is a large consumption of time and money that would be better spent elsewhere.
Look, he's gonna get 1-1.5% of the vote. This is what is going to happen whether he gets a nom nom nomination or not. He'll gank up the Libertarian vote, which, while statistically insignificant and probably be directed at another useless jackoff like Bob Barr, would probably leech less money from people.
Also, "Positive step for freedom" is probably not true. If you've got a bus scheduled to drive a group of people toward the edge of a cliff, and during the trip you replace the driver who is making a steady 55mph with Ron Paul, who is willing to slow down to 10mph, you're still gonna fly off the edge of a fucking cliff, man. It'll just take longer and everyone will blame Ron Paul supporters when it happens.
You get off of the fucking bus yo.
This whole thing is noting but another ancap/minarchist fight hidden behind the excuse of Ron Paul.
If you're a minarchist and think that voting will help you, there's probably no better choice than Ron Paul.
If you're a market anarchist or anarchocapitalist or voluntaryist or leavemethefuckaloneian like me or whatever word applies this week, who thinks it's a sucker's game and a waste of time, you'll spend your money on something more important. Like socks or pickles or a new dildo with a wiggly rabbit on it or whatever.
The idea that people will find more freedom from politicians stealing their money by giving money to a politician hurts my fucking brain.
John Shaw- "You get off of the fucking bus yo."
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Malama Pono! (do what is right)
Best thing to do would be to sabotage the bus. Put some maple syrup in the gas tank, slash the tires, potato in the exhaust pipe, etc.
I agree with Shaw to the point that RP wont make a difference when it comes to politics. Its impossible. I just like the fact he's out there spreading the message. Who knows, maybe some statist fuck hears him speak, thinks about some things a little, changes his tune and ends up being an anarchist in the end.
For this kind of thing, he is useful.
Yes, but would you rather jump off the bus at 55 mph or 10 mph?
Seriously, the resulting chaos and power vacuum from a state collapse would make the likelihood of a stateless society succeeding thje current regime highly unlikely.
Who is John Galt, bitches?!You don't get it do you? It is a lost cause.
Seriously, the resulting chaos and power vacuum from a state collapse would make the likelihood of a stateless society succeeding thje current regime highly unlikely. I think Paul sees this (constantly mentioning a collapse) and is trying to do what he can to mitigate the damage it does and chance for totalitarianism ro follow.
Sorry if that wasn't completely coherent. Tapped out on my Blackberry with a gurgling babbling about 'dada' and 'goo' and 'ya' in my ear. His name's Atlas.
He simply did what he could to speed things along so he could perhaps live in a merit based society.
Thats what im talking about!
I always suggest to anyone who can get free govt cheese, welfare, SSI benefits, food stamps and all that other "help", to go ahead and do so. If it cant be fixed, which I believe to be the case, then why not just push that cocksucker over the edge as quickly as possible?
I myself dont qualify for any of these goodies. Hell, I even tried getting a govt grant for a x-mas tree farm and didn't qualify.
Ah shit. I was rooting for you on that one.
No porn for you. :lol:
He's meant as a positive step for freedom in the US.
He won't be. What he'll be is a large consumption of time and money that would be better spent elsewhere.
Look, he's gonna get 1-1.5% of the vote. This is what is going to happen whether he gets a nom nom nomination or not. He'll gank up the Libertarian vote, which, while statistically insignificant and will probably be directed at another useless jackoff like Bob Barr, would probably leech less money from people.
Also, "Positive step for freedom" is probably not true. If you've got a bus scheduled to drive a group of people toward the edge of a cliff, and during the trip you replace the driver who is making a steady 55mph with Ron Paul, who is willing to slow down to 10mph, you're still gonna fly off the edge of a fucking cliff, man. It'll just take longer and everyone will blame Ron Paul supporters when it happens.
You get off of the fucking bus yo.
This whole thing is nothing but another ancap/minarchist fight hidden behind the excuse of Ron Paul.
If you're a minarchist and think that voting will help you, there's probably no better choice than Ron Paul.
If you're a market anarchist or anarchocapitalist or voluntaryist or leavemethefuckaloneian like me or whatever word applies this week, who thinks it's a sucker's game and a waste of time, you'll spend your money on something more important. Like socks or pickles or a new dildo with a wiggly rabbit on it or whatever.
The idea that people will find more freedom from politicians stealing their money by giving money to a politician hurts my fucking brain.
What is your avatar pic from?
How wrong is it for a heterosexual male to want a wiggly rabbit dildo? I seriously scare myself from time to time.
What is your avatar pic from?
How wrong is it for a heterosexual male to want a wiggly rabbit dildo? I seriously scare myself from time to time.
What is your avatar pic from?
How wrong is it for a heterosexual male to want a wiggly rabbit dildo? I seriously scare myself from time to time.
It's a screenshot of an old Psychic Bunny logo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lom1jJ9PY0Q
Go to 5:08 to view it.
How wrong is it for a heterosexual male to want a wiggly rabbit dildo? I seriously scare myself from time to time.
But they ALL want to kill us.No, but I'd be willing to bet money that a higher percentage of Muslims want to kill us because we're murkin than any other religious group. But I think we're still looking at a tiny tiny minority.
All of em.
Even the baby muslims.
Saw one sittin in its stroller, all innocent looking, but when its mom wasn't looking, it said "I'll end you....infidel!!"