Welcome to the Free Talk Live bulletin board system!
This board is closed to new users and new posts.  Thank you to all our great mods and users over the years.  Details here.
185859 Posts in 9829 Topics by 1371 Members
Latest Member: cjt26
Home Help
+  The Free Talk Live BBS
|-+  Free Talk Live
| |-+  General
| | |-+  Free World Redux
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Free World Redux  (Read 4046 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

digitalfour

  • Guest
Free World Redux
« on: July 09, 2009, 10:30:25 PM »

Can seasteading be accurately compared to the FSP if it's not happening yet?

Has any freedom project ever been successful?

What in the world is accomplishing anything freedom-wise?

If total freedom is not possible in our lifetimes, what should we do?
Logged

blackie

  • Guest
Re: Free World Redux
« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2009, 10:39:46 PM »

No.

Not on a large scale.

Individuals.

Keep your head down.
Logged

fase2000tdi

  • Guest
Re: Free World Redux
« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2009, 10:43:57 PM »

Own a firearm, and be prepared to use it in self defense.

Don't get dragged to a fucking FEMA camp alive.

edit: Tell as many people as you can about liberty. Spread the message of freedom.  That way they'll be more people for the government to deal with.
« Last Edit: July 09, 2009, 10:50:45 PM by fase2000tdi »
Logged

Alex Libman 14

  • Guest
Re: Free World Redux
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2009, 12:09:51 AM »

Seasteading tends to attract future-focused science geek libertarians.

Free State Project tends to attract gun-toting rednecks who like to grow their own food, drink, and smokes.

I'm a little of both.  What's the fuss?
Logged

digitalfour

  • Guest
Re: Free World Redux
« Reply #4 on: July 10, 2009, 02:33:44 PM »

Individuals.

What are they accomplishing?
Logged

BonerJoe

  • Guest
Re: Free World Redux
« Reply #5 on: July 10, 2009, 02:38:11 PM »

Individuals.

What are they accomplishing?

Not getting locked up for fun.
Logged

fatcat

  • Guest
Re: Free World Redux
« Reply #6 on: July 10, 2009, 02:51:46 PM »

Individuals.

What are they accomplishing?

Enjoying their lives?

I have infinitely more respect for a drug dealer avoiding the law and taking care of business, than a bunch of people in NH holding signs and sitting in jail playing hero.

One is a productive member of society, the other is wasting their time, giving the government an excuse to build more jails.

The whole "well what has a better chance than the FSP" argument is redundant. If FSP is accomplishing pretty much the same as nothing, how is it pretty much the same as nothing.

You can seastead right now and be pretty much totally free. Admittedly theres no society you can join, but straight away that makes you far freer than being in NH.

The US federal government is going to get bigger, the NH state government is going to get bigger. If the FSP is "working", who cares?

If your goal is to be free, then the NH is far from ideal given the alternatives.

Is it possible for the FSP to work? Yes. Is there anything to suggest that its likely? No. You can't just rely on the fact that "anything can happen" as an excuse to attract people to a go-nowhere project.

If you jump out of a plane with no parachute its possible you'll survive, but its not something you should plan your life around. The only smart reasons to move to New Hampshire is because its one of the freest states in America, and possibly you like being around other libertarians, though the idea that you should automatically want to be around anyone else whos a libertarian is bizarre to me.

There are plenty of libertarians I don't want anything to do with, and plenty of statists I do. Theres no reason I should automatically like a libertarian anymore than I should automatically like an atheist. Sure libertarianism is a plus, but its not the end all when it comes to people.
Logged

digitalfour

  • Guest
Re: Free World Redux
« Reply #7 on: July 10, 2009, 03:07:04 PM »

I have infinitely more respect for a drug dealer avoiding the law and taking care of business, than a bunch of people in NH holding signs and sitting in jail playing hero.

What about people like Denis Goddard, that are doing the political route?

The whole "well what has a better chance than the FSP" argument is redundant. If FSP is accomplishing pretty much the same as nothing, how is it pretty much the same as nothing.

I don't understand.

You can seastead right now and be pretty much totally free. Admittedly theres no society you can join, but straight away that makes you far freer than being in NH.
If your goal is to be free, then the NH is far from ideal given the alternatives.

My goal is complete liberty. Maybe that's only possible with seasteading, but it's not happening yet.
Logged

Hideaki769

  • Guest
Re: Free World Redux
« Reply #8 on: July 10, 2009, 03:17:22 PM »

First off what good will the political route do? Even if you manage to adjust the system it doesnt stop the feds from doing as they please. California has medicinal marijuana yet the feds still raid them, unreasonable searches and seizures, even recorded and posted on youtube or elsewhere it doesnt stop it from happening or any disciplinary action to those working with the government. What about seceding? Do you think the feds will let that happen when all states have a public debt to them? When he talks about seasteading today i'm pretty sure he's talking about a self sustaining boat for you to live on.
Logged

fatcat

  • Guest
Re: Free World Redux
« Reply #9 on: July 10, 2009, 08:51:12 PM »

I have infinitely more respect for a drug dealer avoiding the law and taking care of business, than a bunch of people in NH holding signs and sitting in jail playing hero.

What about people like Denis Goddard, that are doing the political route?

I don't care about methods, I care about results.

If he's achieved anything, then i'll judge it on those results. Dennis seemed to be one of the more reasonable and pragmatic members of the FSP, although in recent discussion with him over advertising FTL he declined to engage in any rational discussion over cost effectiveness of the methods.

I suggested ways where hundreds of dollars could be saved to achieve the same results, and the response I received was embarrassing considering that (to my knowledge) the promotion was funded by donations from other libertarians.

Now its possible I was incorrect, but as far as I can see my maths is sound and non of the people who were involved in actually spending their time on promoting FTL bothered to prove what they were doing wasn't a waste of money compared to the alternatives.

anyway -- Certainly things have been achieved with local politics. Decriminalized cannabis in numerous states, prostitution, and a number of other freedoms.

However, the overwhelming majority of FSP supporters do not seem interested in discussing results, but rather are happy to mire themselves in meaningless platitudes like "all it takes is to touch one person", "you don't know its not having an effect" and "its better than doing nothing", or by addressing concerns over lack of results with hostility.

Quote
The whole "well what has a better chance than the FSP" argument is redundant. If FSP is accomplishing pretty much the same as nothing, how is it pretty much the same as nothing.

I don't understand.

The FSP has failed to instigate any increase in freedoms in New Hampshire since it was started. At most optimistic you could claim that the FSP has slowed down increases in slavery, even though theres no clear way of attributing it.

Suppose every anti-freedom law that got shot down was because of the FSP. So what? You're slowing the rate at which things get worse. On the current rate of movers, it will take many years before there are even 5,000 people in New Hampshire, still only 0.3% of a very small state (0.0001% of the national population). The original deadline was to shut down the FSP if it hadn't reached 20,000 signers (0.006% of national pop) by 2006 to avoid it becoming a drawn out sink hole of time and resources than never did anything.

Maybe those numbers were off, maybe we only need 1,000, but until any signs of progress start to be made, theres no reason to assume its working or will work. That's not how reason works. You don't assume something is correct just because you want it to, when you have nothing else to back up the belief.

Hell, I've heard people here sincerely claim that "numbers don't matter", if they don't, why aren't huge changed being made with 700 people, why would any more people make a difference if numbers don't matter?

How you expect this to lead to "total freedom" is beyond me. Especially when the increases in Federal Government would make living in America less free, even if New Hampshire started improving (which it won't).

For the FSP just as a project for American libertarians to hang out, maybe push through weed decrim, maybe stop some bullshit laws going through, I think its a great idea (so long as you can't/won't leave america), but to go into it thinking complete freedom is in anyway possible in your lifetime is one of the most grossly unrealistic expectations I've heard from a libertarian.

I for one blame much of the madison avenue salesmanship that FSP members engage in, where they do the best to minimize any negative focus on the FSP, and play to peoples emotions and desire for freedom as much as possible.

When the 20,000 deadline wasn't hit? No problem, we don't need that many people anyway.

When 30% of the First 1000 failed to show up in the 2 year deadline? No problem, they'll be coming later.

When 8 years into the FSP there has not been any noticeable progress made and sign ups have slowed dramatically? Not a problem, its better than doing nothing, what else is there thats better? Eventually we'll hit a tipping point blah blah blah

When NH consistently gets more laws and taxes year after year? I don't know, you tell me.

Again, if you think my views are idiotic and not based on fact, feel free to make some money off that fact, I'll place money on a wager for a whole range of predictions.
Logged

digitalfour

  • Guest
Re: Free World Redux
« Reply #10 on: July 10, 2009, 11:09:36 PM »

For the FSP just as a project for American libertarians to hang out, maybe push through weed decrim, maybe stop some bullshit laws going through, I think its a great idea (so long as you can't/won't leave america), but to go into it thinking complete freedom is in anyway possible in your lifetime is one of the most grossly unrealistic expectations I've heard from a libertarian.

So what is the best shot for complete freedom that one can do right now? Somalia?
Logged

BonerJoe

  • Guest
Re: Free World Redux
« Reply #11 on: July 10, 2009, 11:18:27 PM »

So what is the best shot for complete freedom that one can do right now?

Somewhere not in a city where people leave you the fuck alone as much as possible.
Logged

digitalfour

  • Guest
Re: Free World Redux
« Reply #12 on: July 10, 2009, 11:21:01 PM »

So what is the best shot for complete freedom that one can do right now?
Somewhere not in a city where people leave you the fuck alone as much as possible.

What do you mean?
Logged

BonerJoe

  • Guest
Re: Free World Redux
« Reply #13 on: July 10, 2009, 11:40:25 PM »

So what is the best shot for complete freedom that one can do right now?
Somewhere not in a city where people leave you the fuck alone as much as possible.

What do you mean?

:|
Logged

TimeLady Victorious

  • Aprilicious
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3837
    • View Profile
Re: Free World Redux
« Reply #14 on: July 11, 2009, 12:28:09 AM »

So what is the best shot for complete freedom that one can do right now?
Somewhere not in a city where people leave you the fuck alone as much as possible.

What do you mean?

the more people there are in an area, the less freedom the individual has
Logged
ENGAGE RIDLEY MOTHER FUCKER
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
+  The Free Talk Live BBS
|-+  Free Talk Live
| |-+  General
| | |-+  Free World Redux

// ]]>

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 32 queries.