Welcome to the Free Talk Live bulletin board system!
This board is closed to new users and new posts.  Thank you to all our great mods and users over the years.  Details here.
185859 Posts in 9829 Topics by 1371 Members
Latest Member: cjt26
Home Help
+  The Free Talk Live BBS
|-+  Free Talk Live
| |-+  General
| | |-+  Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 15   Go Down

Author Topic: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners  (Read 66158 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

EclecticBuddha

  • Guest
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #75 on: February 16, 2005, 08:44:06 PM »

and he still hasnt... i just, you know, figured the freaking host would have a solution to a problem he would create by privatizing roads. 
Logged

BKO

  • FTL unAMPlifier Aluminum
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5041
  • Death is only the beginning.
    • View Profile
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #76 on: February 16, 2005, 11:55:44 PM »

Libertarian....

The solution will come in time, have faith :lol: oh, wait....I mean have patience.  Faith is evil.  We are supposed to believe that government is wrong just because they are government and assume that by placing your blind faith in us and by voting, all will be solved.

Politics sucks.

FTL_Ian

  • Professional Iconoclast
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10446
    • View Profile
    • Free Keene
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #77 on: February 17, 2005, 01:03:25 PM »

I'm sorry, what does privatizing roads have to do with this thread?  We talked about it on air last week... go hit the archives..  If you aren't clear, call in..  no time to post much at the moment.
Logged
Please support the show by joining the AMP program at http//amp.freetalklive.com

I blog at http://freekeene.com

GRAYWOLF

  • Guest
Just to keep the hijack going...
« Reply #78 on: February 17, 2005, 01:12:51 PM »

Solving Problems in a Free Society

by Harry Browne
February 9, 2005

After I wrote about the Age of Tranquility http://www.harrybrowne.org/Journal0501.htm#0131 (the period before there were drug laws in America), I received the following email:

A frightening thought - if the clock were to be turned back, free access to drugs once again.

In earlier times these things simply evolved, no fuss or feathers. As you say, they were there, people used them as such (a bit like glue used to be in my own childhood, something used to stick fingers to balsa wood; it never occurred to us to sniff it). Today the mentality is different.

Now there is too much mystique - take the lid off and the box would explode? If these drugs are as addictive as claimed, and they suddenly became freely available ... brrrrrrrr.

I understand the concept of freedom, to destroy oneself if one chooses; I also believe that the majority of people are decent and have common sense. A country with a small population might be able to absorb such an experiment, but your country with its unique mindset ("Bomb everybody to make the world safe") couldn't handle it.


I can see why it would be easy to believe this. Much the same fears were expressed when the repeal of Alcohol Prohibition was being considered in the early 1930s - even though Prohibition had been in force only a little over a decade. There was talk that America would become a nation of drunks - that the people who had been teetotalers before Prohibition would now be tempted to give it a try, and that the old customs that restrained people voluntarily would no longer be respected.

Of course, when Prohibition ended, people celebrated happily for a few weeks - and then life returned to pre-Prohibition normality. The gang wars were over, no one had to risk his life drinking bathtub gin anymore, and police corruption diminished rapidly. The celebrations were about more than just the availability of legal booze; they cheered the return of peace and freedom.

Planned Economy or Freedom?

A similar situation occurred at the end of World War II.

As the war was winding down in 1945, there was a great deal of hand-wringing over the problem of 10 million GIs coming home from war and looking for jobs. How could the economy handle such a huge, sudden influx of labor? The Common Wisdom predicted another Great Depression. (Actually, the first one had never ended, since very few people saw their standard of living increase during the war).

When the war ended, Congress set to work to create a giant plan to control the transition to a peacetime economy, work the returning soldiers into the labor force without disruption, and generally save us from chaos and destitution.

But, instead, one of those miracles happened that don't come around very often: Congress argued so long over the plan that it was never implemented. So the U.S. economy had to fend for itself - and fend it did. The ex-servicemen found jobs, the economy took off upward, and the Great Depression was finally over after 16 years.

The Congressmen and pundits, never having studied economics seriously, were unaware of Say's Law. Stated simply it is: Any new supply is accompanied by an equivalent new demand. In other words, any new entrant into the labor force also brings with himself a demand for products and services at least equal to the employment he seeks. So when 10 million more workers were available and seeking jobs, there was now new demand that was equal to 10 million people, requiring 10 million more people to produce the products and services necessary to meet that demand. In short, a new job for each new worker.

The only problem involved was the matching of new workers to the new jobs that were created by the new demand of people who hadn't been in the market for new refrigerators when they were sitting in foxholes in places like Italy and Wake Island. How was the matching-up going to be handled?

Well - guess what - people who knew how to handle such things suddenly appeared out of nowhere, made their services available for a profit, and the entire transition was over within a year after the end of the war. The economy really boomed for the first time since 1929.

The Principle

The principle here is: Whatever the problem in a free market, it will be a profitable opportunity for someone who knows how to fix it.

Whatever difficulty you think might occur in a free market - people afraid to buy products for fear they're unsafe, no way to raise the money for some huge project, people insecure for some reason - it represents an opportunity for someone to solve the problem and make a profit for himself. The bigger the problem, the bigger the payoff for solving it, and the more people who will turn their attention to solving it - including a lot of very smart people who previously had not had an interest in the subject, especially not before there was a free market to reward them for taking an interest.

The transition to a society of legalized drugs is a different problem from the economic transition after World War II. But the solution is always the same: more liberty and less government. Free people will sort things out because they have to in order to get what they want; politicians know only how to play political games.

We don't have to know how everything will be handled in a free society. All we have to know is that free people have much more incentive to solve problems than do politicians whose own livelihood and life savings are never on the line.

-----
Harry Browne is the Director of Public Policy for the Downsize DC Foundation and a radio talk-show host, syndicated on the Genesis Communications Network www.gcnlive.com. He's the author of 12 books that have sold more than 2 million copies, some of which are now available online at www.LibertyFree.com

|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|


L i b e r t y W i r e
is the official email list of theDownsize DC Foundation -- a non-profiteducational organization promoting the ideas ofindividual liberty and personal responsibility.

VISIT the Foundation's web site at http://www.DownsizeDC.com
Logged

Lindsey

  • Rock Star
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 30370
  • I like Mars.
    • View Profile
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #79 on: February 17, 2005, 03:35:06 PM »

Why are you posting that in the SHRINE OF FEMALE LISTENERS forum?  I'd move it, but I'm not sure I can...and I don't know how.
Logged
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.
         -George W. Bush

GRAYWOLF

  • Guest
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #80 on: February 17, 2005, 03:53:05 PM »

Why are you posting that in the SHRINE OF FEMALE LISTENERS forum?  I'd move it, but I'm not sure I can...and I don't know how.

It pertains to the "roads" hijack.
Logged

EclecticBuddha

  • Guest
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #81 on: February 17, 2005, 06:43:33 PM »

lmao, I'm a solitary asshole... i prefer to work alone as an "annoyer of fortune"  I would be a soldier but obviously the jarhead pieces of shit like to drown anyone who isnt a brainwashed idiot.
Logged

bonerjoe

  • Guest
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #82 on: February 17, 2005, 09:45:43 PM »

Who are all these women who listen to this show, and why aren't they sleeping in my bed?
Logged

BKO

  • FTL unAMPlifier Aluminum
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5041
  • Death is only the beginning.
    • View Profile
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #83 on: February 17, 2005, 09:56:17 PM »

Probably because a majority are fake women. :lol:

Just a wild guess.

Lindsey

  • Rock Star
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 30370
  • I like Mars.
    • View Profile
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #84 on: February 17, 2005, 10:07:13 PM »

Fake women?  As in...women sending in pictures of other women who are more attractive than they are?  Or fake women as in men sending in pictures of women?  Because only the recent ones have been fake, and a few others before that.  And yes, one (maybe more) was sent in by a stupid guy pretending to be a girl... :P
Logged
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.
         -George W. Bush

BKO

  • FTL unAMPlifier Aluminum
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5041
  • Death is only the beginning.
    • View Profile
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #85 on: February 17, 2005, 10:12:41 PM »

I guess I meant fake women in general. :lol:


But you aren't fake because you look real.  Kinda cute, too. ;)

bonerjoe

  • Guest
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #86 on: February 17, 2005, 10:14:31 PM »

I thought Lindsey was a lesbo. Sorry if I'm wrong.
Logged

Lindsey

  • Rock Star
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 30370
  • I like Mars.
    • View Profile
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #87 on: February 17, 2005, 10:30:09 PM »

Well now there are two Lindseys on the shrine.  I'm obviously the one where it says MODERATOR OF THE FTL BBS under the picture.  Not that crazy bitch who called in one night...she was goofy.

And the lesbo thing...WHAT THE FUCK?  I'm not sure I WANT to know how you came to that conclusion...unless you're talking about crazy Lindsey and not me.
Logged
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.
         -George W. Bush

BKO

  • FTL unAMPlifier Aluminum
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5041
  • Death is only the beginning.
    • View Profile
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #88 on: February 17, 2005, 11:02:03 PM »

Lesbians are people, too!

bonerjoe

  • Guest
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #89 on: February 17, 2005, 11:04:00 PM »

It's which choose not to procreate aren't people.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 15   Go Up
+  The Free Talk Live BBS
|-+  Free Talk Live
| |-+  General
| | |-+  Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners

// ]]>

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 33 queries.