Welcome to the Free Talk Live bulletin board system!
This board is closed to new users and new posts.  Thank you to all our great mods and users over the years.  Details here.
185859 Posts in 9829 Topics by 1371 Members
Latest Member: cjt26
Home Help
+  The Free Talk Live BBS
|-+  Free Talk Live
| |-+  General
| | |-+  Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 15   Go Down

Author Topic: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners  (Read 63338 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

EclecticBuddha

  • Guest
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #15 on: February 09, 2005, 10:33:28 PM »

the funny ones on bikes in parades... er... if you like Alex Jones, the evil masons.
Logged

BKO

  • FTL unAMPlifier Aluminum
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5041
  • Death is only the beginning.
    • View Profile
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #16 on: February 09, 2005, 10:36:06 PM »

AJ rules.

EclecticBuddha

  • Guest
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #17 on: February 09, 2005, 10:36:57 PM »

so do Masons
« Last Edit: February 09, 2005, 10:54:08 PM by EclecticBuddha »
Logged

Lindsey

  • Rock Star
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 30370
  • I like Mars.
    • View Profile
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #18 on: February 10, 2005, 04:04:12 PM »

Hrm...I guess nobody got it.  I meant people besides females on the Free Talk Live shrine, heh.  :P
Logged
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.
         -George W. Bush

EclecticBuddha

  • Guest
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #19 on: February 10, 2005, 04:32:52 PM »

does it matter if anybody got it?  you act like the purpose of the BBS is to talk about the topics instead of roaming around wherever the winds of change lead the conversation.
Logged

Lindsey

  • Rock Star
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 30370
  • I like Mars.
    • View Profile
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #20 on: February 10, 2005, 04:41:17 PM »

Pfft!  :lol:
Logged
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.
         -George W. Bush

EclecticBuddha

  • Guest
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #21 on: February 10, 2005, 04:44:47 PM »

Cha...
Logged

Lindsey

  • Rock Star
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 30370
  • I like Mars.
    • View Profile
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #22 on: February 10, 2005, 09:11:25 PM »

One word posts are so fun.  Almost as fun as posts containing only punctuation.
Logged
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.
         -George W. Bush

EclecticBuddha

  • Guest
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #23 on: February 10, 2005, 09:23:20 PM »

...
Logged

FTL_Ian

  • Professional Iconoclast
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10446
    • View Profile
    • Free Keene
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #24 on: February 10, 2005, 09:43:57 PM »

!!!
Logged
Please support the show by joining the AMP program at http//amp.freetalklive.com

I blog at http://freekeene.com

EclecticBuddha

  • Guest
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #25 on: February 10, 2005, 09:59:03 PM »

.








I WIN!!! oh wait, dammit, I lost.  I'm so dumb.
Logged

Lindsey

  • Rock Star
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 30370
  • I like Mars.
    • View Profile
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #26 on: February 10, 2005, 11:25:19 PM »

Haha.

"xX!" is one of my personal favorites, although it IS two letters and an exclamation point, instead of just punctuation.  But it serves its purpose.  Some people prefer to use "o.0" or "o_0", but I think "xX" is much better.  Alas, I must credit "xX" to our very own Mallory.
Logged
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.
         -George W. Bush

EclecticBuddha

  • Guest
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #27 on: February 10, 2005, 11:41:21 PM »

Lmao, whats this topic again?  I look like a house?  Something like that.  Though the direction the conversation has taken intrigues me "xX"

Paul
Logged

EclecticBuddha

  • Guest
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #28 on: February 10, 2005, 11:47:17 PM »

Its amazing, I have over 100 posts and i still dont have a damn thing to say. 
Logged

Lindsey

  • Rock Star
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 30370
  • I like Mars.
    • View Profile
Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
« Reply #29 on: February 11, 2005, 03:03:32 PM »

This is my 274th post, and I still don't really have anything to say that really matters.  Plus, a bunch of the posters on here hate me, for whatever reason.  So most of the posts have been responses to shit fits.
Logged
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.
         -George W. Bush
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 15   Go Up
+  The Free Talk Live BBS
|-+  Free Talk Live
| |-+  General
| | |-+  Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners

// ]]>

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 33 queries.