The Free Talk Live BBS

Free Talk Live => General => Topic started by: awakenfree on February 07, 2005, 09:03:23 PM

Title: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: awakenfree on February 07, 2005, 09:03:23 PM
If you have ever seen the winners of the publisher clearing house Sweepstakes, you know that they are a group you wouldn't want your picture to be posted with.  Now go take a look at the Shrine.  :lol:

I know what you are trying to do.. Sucker guys to visit your whack site but it ain't working. And if you have 250 people that use this forum I would like to know where the hell they are at. :lol:

 By the way if you take this post down I'll just post it again    :lol:

One last note... To anyone that wants to reply to this post: Go ahead because from now on I'm just going to Delete ,then copy paste the same message again. LIke I'm going to do from now on.  :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 08, 2005, 04:20:15 PM
lmfao.. i actually agree with you on this one... theres only one reason for having the shrine... male listeners. however, its not THAT bad of a group. a little exaggerated but right nonetheless.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: F***ALLGOV on February 08, 2005, 05:13:12 PM
why don't you post your picture awaken :D :D
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 08, 2005, 05:55:28 PM
Hey, some of the girls on the shrine are decent looking.  But some of them are also fake.  But the rest of us...it's not our fault.  :-P
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: awakenfree on February 09, 2005, 12:32:15 AM
why don't you post your picture awaken :D :D

Because Ian is a bitch. I said I would post my picture !
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: FTL_Ian on February 09, 2005, 09:47:45 AM
How is it that I'm preventing you from posting your pic?
Ian
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 09, 2005, 05:06:57 PM
I'm sure he's just as, if not more 'flawed' than the rest of us.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 09, 2005, 05:52:05 PM
There needs to be a shrine of shemale listeners.  Then i could go to the local goodwill and pretty myself up and be able to flaunt myself as the free very large and very confused young man that I am.  8)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 09, 2005, 07:25:59 PM
That's beyond creepy.  The shrine is scary enough in it itself sometimes.  :-P  We don't need you in a dress to add to the emotional scarring.   :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 09, 2005, 07:42:35 PM
  :cry:  I'm so hurt *sniff* *sniff* :cry:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 09, 2005, 07:46:22 PM
Haha.  I hope you know I'm just fucking around with you!  :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 09, 2005, 08:17:27 PM
Yeah but i'm still depressed that my feminine side has no good public place where it can cause a collective public upchuck.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 09, 2005, 08:45:38 PM
I'm sure there are some clubs you can join :-P

Or maybe there's some sort of emo'd out LiveJournal community where you can join and post pictures of yourself all dolled up.

And contrary to Awakenfree's opinion, I'd just like to say that I don't think I could be mistaken for a man...even if I were standing here wearing a tux.  I might be ugly, but you can still tell I'm a girl. :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 09, 2005, 09:07:04 PM
Hey, I could be the example of the bottom of the barrel.  That way anyone could look and say "At least I dont look like that."
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 09, 2005, 09:55:10 PM
Thanks, that made me laugh!   :lol:

And just as I was clicking post on this message the first time, I noticed the title of the topic.  Female shriners as opposed to...what other shriners?   :P
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 09, 2005, 10:33:28 PM
the funny ones on bikes in parades... er... if you like Alex Jones, the evil masons.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 09, 2005, 10:36:06 PM
AJ rules.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 09, 2005, 10:36:57 PM
so do Masons
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 10, 2005, 04:04:12 PM
Hrm...I guess nobody got it.  I meant people besides females on the Free Talk Live shrine, heh.  :P
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 10, 2005, 04:32:52 PM
does it matter if anybody got it?  you act like the purpose of the BBS is to talk about the topics instead of roaming around wherever the winds of change lead the conversation.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 10, 2005, 04:41:17 PM
Pfft!  :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 10, 2005, 04:44:47 PM
Cha...
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 10, 2005, 09:11:25 PM
One word posts are so fun.  Almost as fun as posts containing only punctuation.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 10, 2005, 09:23:20 PM
...
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: FTL_Ian on February 10, 2005, 09:43:57 PM
!!!
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 10, 2005, 09:59:03 PM
.








I WIN!!! oh wait, dammit, I lost.  I'm so dumb.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 10, 2005, 11:25:19 PM
Haha.

"xX!" is one of my personal favorites, although it IS two letters and an exclamation point, instead of just punctuation.  But it serves its purpose.  Some people prefer to use "o.0" or "o_0", but I think "xX" is much better.  Alas, I must credit "xX" to our very own Mallory.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 10, 2005, 11:41:21 PM
Lmao, whats this topic again?  I look like a house?  Something like that.  Though the direction the conversation has taken intrigues me "xX"

Paul
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 10, 2005, 11:47:17 PM
Its amazing, I have over 100 posts and i still dont have a damn thing to say. 
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 11, 2005, 03:03:32 PM
This is my 274th post, and I still don't really have anything to say that really matters.  Plus, a bunch of the posters on here hate me, for whatever reason.  So most of the posts have been responses to shit fits.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: GRAYWOLF on February 11, 2005, 08:00:21 PM
`
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 11, 2005, 08:23:23 PM
Yay for useless posts then Lindsey. Yay indeed.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 13, 2005, 02:19:23 AM
Let's make this thread the longest thread in history.  Whooos with me?
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 13, 2005, 02:35:02 AM
one thread is going on 8 pages dude
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 13, 2005, 02:42:09 AM
Yeah I saw that one.  I don't like the title, nor do I thik many would appreciate us mucking it up.  THIS thread, however, is quite finito.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 13, 2005, 02:43:57 AM
woo
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 13, 2005, 02:44:09 AM
hoo!
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 13, 2005, 02:45:35 AM
it's
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 13, 2005, 02:45:55 AM
tell me:  Poor choice of wording?  "Dude, your mom looks Phat in her bikini!"

Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 13, 2005, 02:46:30 AM
I love Rice.  I am eating some right now.  Again.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 13, 2005, 02:46:31 AM
going
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 13, 2005, 02:46:44 AM
to
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 13, 2005, 02:47:08 AM
It is kinda starchy, I forgot to rinse it.  Oh well....
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 13, 2005, 02:47:33 AM
take
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 13, 2005, 02:47:44 AM
awhile
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 13, 2005, 02:47:55 AM
to
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 13, 2005, 02:47:55 AM
To?  Rain?

To...be cold tomorrow?

To what? Spit it out, man!
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 13, 2005, 02:48:24 AM
make
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 13, 2005, 02:48:42 AM
Did you know that you can use ALT+S to submit your posts?  It is a cool shortcut!
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 13, 2005, 02:48:54 AM
this
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 13, 2005, 02:49:08 AM
huge!
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 13, 2005, 02:49:55 AM
HEY!  Did you know that garlic is a type of onion?
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 13, 2005, 02:50:21 AM
I
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 13, 2005, 02:50:50 AM
Always
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 13, 2005, 02:51:19 AM
EAT
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 13, 2005, 02:51:37 AM
Garlic.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 13, 2005, 02:53:06 AM
I have more posts than you.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 13, 2005, 02:53:22 AM
Which I find extremely odd....
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 13, 2005, 02:54:01 AM
Of course, the last 8 posts have been mine...
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 13, 2005, 11:32:51 AM
No one word posts!  That's cheating!  Or one letter, we should make them at least one sentence.  :)

And...

Oh look, my karma count has gone down!  Thanks Awakenfree!  :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: awakenfree on February 13, 2005, 11:43:23 AM
No one word posts!  That's cheating!  Or one letter, we should make them at least one sentence.  :)

And...

Oh look, my karma count has gone down!  Thanks Awakenfree!  :lol:

  Why on earth would you think it's me ????
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 13, 2005, 12:28:30 PM
Hrm, let's see...

BECAUSE YOU HATE ALL OF US?  :P
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: awakenfree on February 13, 2005, 01:35:45 PM
Hrm, let's see...

BECAUSE YOU HATE ALL OF US?  :P

   Look I don't give a shit about your whack Karma. If it's me ,why didn't I start doing it along time ago dummy. :shock:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 13, 2005, 04:59:18 PM
It was a joke.  A joke is something that we as human beings are not supposed to take literally.

I never said it was a funny joke.  Relax, you dumb shit.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 13, 2005, 09:25:29 PM
applause :)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 13, 2005, 09:27:48 PM
I realized I could live off of ramen noodles and jello.  mmm what a great meal
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 13, 2005, 10:37:57 PM
I have WAY too many Ramen noodle packages in my pantry.

I am eating your mom right now.

ok, ok, Linguine with my own tomatoe sauce.  It is devine. *burp*
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 14, 2005, 12:33:01 AM
go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site.go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. v go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site.go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. go to my web site. (http://bipdesign.com)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 14, 2005, 09:04:06 PM
Pardon my french but youre fucking retarded.  :P  oh sorry, youre "Le" fucking retard (i did say french)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 14, 2005, 09:06:15 PM
I resent that since it is coming to me in French.  AND WHO THE FUCK IS THIS PASTOR ON THE RADIO RIGHT NOW??!!??!!

I thought FTL was on longer than this.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 14, 2005, 09:11:26 PM
are you listening to the tasteofthegoods stream, b/c alex jones' stream cuts out for the third hour go to the FTL site and open that stream
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 14, 2005, 09:11:57 PM
I had that problem b4
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 14, 2005, 09:31:49 PM
oh ok.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 14, 2005, 09:54:53 PM
and now you're calling in like a little beyatch, just remember this paul isnt paul that calls in... paul that calls in is awakenfree... because hes a bitch like that and ruining my good name.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 14, 2005, 10:13:11 PM
and now you're calling in like a little beyatch, just remember this paul isnt paul that calls in... paul that calls in is awakenfree... because hes a bitch like that and ruining my good name.

LOL  I didn't wanna talk about roads.  But I did say that you were whining because Ian has not answered your question...
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 16, 2005, 08:44:06 PM
and he still hasnt... i just, you know, figured the freaking host would have a solution to a problem he would create by privatizing roads. 
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 16, 2005, 11:55:44 PM
Libertarian....

The solution will come in time, have faith :lol: oh, wait....I mean have patience.  Faith is evil.  We are supposed to believe that government is wrong just because they are government and assume that by placing your blind faith in us and by voting, all will be solved.

Politics sucks.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: FTL_Ian on February 17, 2005, 01:03:25 PM
I'm sorry, what does privatizing roads have to do with this thread?  We talked about it on air last week... go hit the archives..  If you aren't clear, call in..  no time to post much at the moment.
Title: Just to keep the hijack going...
Post by: GRAYWOLF on February 17, 2005, 01:12:51 PM
Solving Problems in a Free Society

by Harry Browne
February 9, 2005

After I wrote about the Age of Tranquility http://www.harrybrowne.org/Journal0501.htm#0131 (the period before there were drug laws in America), I received the following email:

A frightening thought - if the clock were to be turned back, free access to drugs once again.

In earlier times these things simply evolved, no fuss or feathers. As you say, they were there, people used them as such (a bit like glue used to be in my own childhood, something used to stick fingers to balsa wood; it never occurred to us to sniff it). Today the mentality is different.

Now there is too much mystique - take the lid off and the box would explode? If these drugs are as addictive as claimed, and they suddenly became freely available ... brrrrrrrr.

I understand the concept of freedom, to destroy oneself if one chooses; I also believe that the majority of people are decent and have common sense. A country with a small population might be able to absorb such an experiment, but your country with its unique mindset ("Bomb everybody to make the world safe") couldn't handle it.


I can see why it would be easy to believe this. Much the same fears were expressed when the repeal of Alcohol Prohibition was being considered in the early 1930s - even though Prohibition had been in force only a little over a decade. There was talk that America would become a nation of drunks - that the people who had been teetotalers before Prohibition would now be tempted to give it a try, and that the old customs that restrained people voluntarily would no longer be respected.

Of course, when Prohibition ended, people celebrated happily for a few weeks - and then life returned to pre-Prohibition normality. The gang wars were over, no one had to risk his life drinking bathtub gin anymore, and police corruption diminished rapidly. The celebrations were about more than just the availability of legal booze; they cheered the return of peace and freedom.

Planned Economy or Freedom?

A similar situation occurred at the end of World War II.

As the war was winding down in 1945, there was a great deal of hand-wringing over the problem of 10 million GIs coming home from war and looking for jobs. How could the economy handle such a huge, sudden influx of labor? The Common Wisdom predicted another Great Depression. (Actually, the first one had never ended, since very few people saw their standard of living increase during the war).

When the war ended, Congress set to work to create a giant plan to control the transition to a peacetime economy, work the returning soldiers into the labor force without disruption, and generally save us from chaos and destitution.

But, instead, one of those miracles happened that don't come around very often: Congress argued so long over the plan that it was never implemented. So the U.S. economy had to fend for itself - and fend it did. The ex-servicemen found jobs, the economy took off upward, and the Great Depression was finally over after 16 years.

The Congressmen and pundits, never having studied economics seriously, were unaware of Say's Law. Stated simply it is: Any new supply is accompanied by an equivalent new demand. In other words, any new entrant into the labor force also brings with himself a demand for products and services at least equal to the employment he seeks. So when 10 million more workers were available and seeking jobs, there was now new demand that was equal to 10 million people, requiring 10 million more people to produce the products and services necessary to meet that demand. In short, a new job for each new worker.

The only problem involved was the matching of new workers to the new jobs that were created by the new demand of people who hadn't been in the market for new refrigerators when they were sitting in foxholes in places like Italy and Wake Island. How was the matching-up going to be handled?

Well - guess what - people who knew how to handle such things suddenly appeared out of nowhere, made their services available for a profit, and the entire transition was over within a year after the end of the war. The economy really boomed for the first time since 1929.

The Principle

The principle here is: Whatever the problem in a free market, it will be a profitable opportunity for someone who knows how to fix it.

Whatever difficulty you think might occur in a free market - people afraid to buy products for fear they're unsafe, no way to raise the money for some huge project, people insecure for some reason - it represents an opportunity for someone to solve the problem and make a profit for himself. The bigger the problem, the bigger the payoff for solving it, and the more people who will turn their attention to solving it - including a lot of very smart people who previously had not had an interest in the subject, especially not before there was a free market to reward them for taking an interest.

The transition to a society of legalized drugs is a different problem from the economic transition after World War II. But the solution is always the same: more liberty and less government. Free people will sort things out because they have to in order to get what they want; politicians know only how to play political games.

We don't have to know how everything will be handled in a free society. All we have to know is that free people have much more incentive to solve problems than do politicians whose own livelihood and life savings are never on the line.

-----
Harry Browne is the Director of Public Policy for the Downsize DC Foundation and a radio talk-show host, syndicated on the Genesis Communications Network www.gcnlive.com. He's the author of 12 books that have sold more than 2 million copies, some of which are now available online at www.LibertyFree.com

|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|


L i b e r t y W i r e
is the official email list of theDownsize DC Foundation -- a non-profiteducational organization promoting the ideas ofindividual liberty and personal responsibility.

VISIT the Foundation's web site at http://www.DownsizeDC.com
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 17, 2005, 03:35:06 PM
Why are you posting that in the SHRINE OF FEMALE LISTENERS forum?  I'd move it, but I'm not sure I can...and I don't know how.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: GRAYWOLF on February 17, 2005, 03:53:05 PM
Why are you posting that in the SHRINE OF FEMALE LISTENERS forum?  I'd move it, but I'm not sure I can...and I don't know how.

It pertains to the "roads" hijack.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 17, 2005, 06:43:33 PM
lmao, I'm a solitary asshole... i prefer to work alone as an "annoyer of fortune"  I would be a soldier but obviously the jarhead pieces of shit like to drown anyone who isnt a brainwashed idiot.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on February 17, 2005, 09:45:43 PM
Who are all these women who listen to this show, and why aren't they sleeping in my bed?
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 17, 2005, 09:56:17 PM
Probably because a majority are fake women. :lol:

Just a wild guess.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 17, 2005, 10:07:13 PM
Fake women?  As in...women sending in pictures of other women who are more attractive than they are?  Or fake women as in men sending in pictures of women?  Because only the recent ones have been fake, and a few others before that.  And yes, one (maybe more) was sent in by a stupid guy pretending to be a girl... :P
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 17, 2005, 10:12:41 PM
I guess I meant fake women in general. :lol:


But you aren't fake because you look real.  Kinda cute, too. ;)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on February 17, 2005, 10:14:31 PM
I thought Lindsey was a lesbo. Sorry if I'm wrong.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 17, 2005, 10:30:09 PM
Well now there are two Lindseys on the shrine.  I'm obviously the one where it says MODERATOR OF THE FTL BBS under the picture.  Not that crazy bitch who called in one night...she was goofy.

And the lesbo thing...WHAT THE FUCK?  I'm not sure I WANT to know how you came to that conclusion...unless you're talking about crazy Lindsey and not me.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 17, 2005, 11:02:03 PM
Lesbians are people, too!
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on February 17, 2005, 11:04:00 PM
It's which choose not to procreate aren't people.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 18, 2005, 07:51:30 PM
i think brokor needs to keep it in his pants AND WHAT ABOUT THE MOTHERFUCKING PRIVATE RURAL ROADS!!!
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 18, 2005, 08:45:54 PM
Well, it could be worse, Paul.  I could be gay. 

Then who would all the lesbians sleep with when they got tired of tongue and decided to graduate to a purpose in life, like bouncing on cock. 

Custin knows about cock, ask him.  He loves the cock. :lol:

All in good fun, Custin. :) 


*cough* cocksucker.

Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Custin on February 18, 2005, 10:10:07 PM
Well, it could be worse, Paul.  I could be gay. 

Then who would all the lesbians sleep with when they got tired of tongue and decided to graduate to a purpose in life, like bouncing on cock. 

Custin knows about cock, ask him.  He loves the cock. :lol:




All in good fun, Custin. :) 
























 *cough* cocksucker.



(http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/6210/gladyouposted.gif)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 18, 2005, 10:19:28 PM
Aww look, my karma is -8.  How sweet!  :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 18, 2005, 10:21:03 PM
Nuh uh, it's -7 ;)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on February 18, 2005, 10:22:27 PM
Thanks  :D

Looks like you're the BBS favorite so far.  Your karma is way higher than anyone else's!  :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on February 18, 2005, 10:23:32 PM
-6.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 18, 2005, 10:28:52 PM
Ya, I am quite the politician. ;)

Except recently.  I have been having fun lowering myself to slinging insults with Custin.  But, he's a good chap.  He always takes it on the chin.


ISN'T THAT RIGHT, CUSTIN???

(http://cum-facial-pics.com/cum_facials_03/pics/cum_facials_03.jpg)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on February 18, 2005, 10:30:06 PM
*yawn*

(http://oregonstate.edu/~koyamac/hump.JPG)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on February 18, 2005, 10:31:07 PM
Hey, is that an orb?

Someone send it to George Noory.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Custin on February 18, 2005, 10:50:00 PM
*yawn*

(http://oregonstate.edu/~koyamac/hump.JPG)
Haha, nice joe total
(http://www.surroscape.com/img/iceburn.gif)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on February 18, 2005, 10:54:43 PM
haha, ya I need ALOT of help here, joe...
(http://www.surroscape.com/img/iceburn.gif)

haha, that was funny, joe...
(http://www.surroscape.com/img/iceburn.gif)

Really, that dog on that guy....whoa! -haha!....
(http://www.surroscape.com/img/iceburn.gif)

haha, Jump right in any time joe...
(http://www.surroscape.com/img/iceburn.gif)


:roll:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on February 18, 2005, 11:24:53 PM
Meh.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 19, 2005, 12:11:26 AM
Ok, time for the big dismount of the karma high horse... What Did the 5 Fingers Say to the Face???  Slap!!! I'm Rick James, BITCH!!!
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: FTL_Ian on February 19, 2005, 02:45:02 AM
One can never have enough photos of dogs dry humping humans.   :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Custin on February 19, 2005, 12:51:50 PM
One can never have enough photos of dogs dry humping humans.   :lol:

Indeed:

(http://img203.exs.cx/img203/8629/owned9mt.png)

Do you have shriner on your back in that picture Ian?
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 19, 2005, 03:28:50 PM
its so heartwarming... that should be on ians christmas cards... the love between a man and his pet is just so touching.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on February 19, 2005, 03:51:38 PM
:-D
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on February 19, 2005, 09:33:46 PM
Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
I hate my parents.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 01, 2005, 06:43:49 PM
again i petition for a shrine of shemale listeners
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 01, 2005, 07:27:37 PM
Only those born female should be in there.

But, then do hermaphrodites qualify?
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 01, 2005, 07:32:09 PM
well duh, thats why there needs to be a new shrine
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 01, 2005, 07:54:29 PM
Do you qualify?
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 01, 2005, 07:57:50 PM
i could

but more than likely i just want to wear a dress
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 01, 2005, 08:01:00 PM
;-)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 01, 2005, 08:21:39 PM
thanks honey buns
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 01, 2005, 08:28:28 PM
<3

Call me.

(http://img62.exs.cx/img62/7574/crossdresser4lm.jpg)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 01, 2005, 10:02:32 PM
...




Oh.  My.  God.   :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 01, 2005, 10:04:37 PM
i dont think i could find an outfit like that that would allow my wide ass in it.  If there is ever a crossdressing shrine i'll be conservative and maintain my womanly dignity.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 01, 2005, 10:19:13 PM
That outfit looks really uncomfortable.  Kind of like what I had on tonight.  Except I had a really ugly dress on over it.  Those thigh-hi things are a fucking bitch to wear.  Never will I do that again *shudders*.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 01, 2005, 10:58:32 PM
ok, so you dress like something out of rocky horror, how distatefully trashy.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 01, 2005, 11:25:15 PM
Naw, I had a chorus concert, and our concert dresses are hideous.  And we have to wear pantyhose or something of the like, so you don't see pale legs while we walk across the stage.

I'm never clicking on anything you send me again.   :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 02, 2005, 03:56:40 AM
mua ha ha ha ha (http://home.satx.rr.com/eventhorizons/The%20Count%20Balls.jpg)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 02, 2005, 06:11:54 AM
RIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT.

(Everyone nod and smile)

 :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 03, 2005, 12:57:02 AM
my short and worthless posts obviously arent appreciated enough in here... but they're tolerated and sometimes thats just as good.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 03, 2005, 02:45:58 AM
(pats you on the head)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 03, 2005, 03:53:04 AM
*purrs*
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 05, 2005, 08:45:49 PM
(http://img57.exs.cx/img57/5410/rowr4qi.jpg)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 05, 2005, 09:15:39 PM
hot.... so damn hot...
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 05, 2005, 09:17:48 PM
Put that cigar down.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 05, 2005, 09:19:25 PM
dont smoke cigars... i smoke cloves.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 05, 2005, 09:20:14 PM
You smoke any other "c"'s?
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 05, 2005, 09:21:43 PM
yes, cock.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 05, 2005, 09:32:04 PM
Oooook.

(scratches that idea off the list)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 05, 2005, 09:44:51 PM
cranberries? (the band) Chrysanthemums? Carnations? Cardiff?
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 05, 2005, 09:48:45 PM
Candy canes?
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 05, 2005, 09:51:15 PM
constantinople
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 05, 2005, 09:58:40 PM
crabs?
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 05, 2005, 10:02:01 PM
canadian credit cards?
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 05, 2005, 10:05:36 PM
cannoli?
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 05, 2005, 10:47:39 PM
Croatian Calamari Clam Chowder?
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 05, 2005, 11:05:44 PM
Manchowder?
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 05, 2005, 11:06:32 PM
you are intimidated by my mastery of C words
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 05, 2005, 11:28:58 PM
You forgot the evil one, though.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 05, 2005, 11:37:35 PM
I already said canada
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 05, 2005, 11:41:22 PM
crap
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 05, 2005, 11:42:52 PM
later
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 06, 2005, 09:38:43 AM
Canadian cult cunt classic!  I win!
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 06, 2005, 03:53:29 PM
Canadian Cumin Crab Cake Con Carne  eat it, bitch, thats 6 C's
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 06, 2005, 04:10:08 PM
Yeah, but mine had cunt in it... :P
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 06, 2005, 04:15:48 PM
yay but mine has Cumin... a very good spice indeed.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 06, 2005, 04:21:22 PM
I have some of that in my kitchen.  And I have curry and cloves too.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 06, 2005, 04:23:14 PM
what color of cumin... cloves rock, not only can you smoke them, they make ham tasty too!  Get some cayenne pepper.  THen the next time you make hot cocoa put just a little in.  It's great I swear.  I think the recipie was on Good Eats so its on Food TV's website.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 06, 2005, 04:29:34 PM
I have cayenne too.  I forgot about that.  I love Good Eats.  Alton Brown is SO awesome!
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 06, 2005, 04:34:26 PM
i know, he makes everything so damn easy.  I love the meat smoker he made out of a locker and a hot plate... hes the culinary Macguyver... only without the mullett... I cant wait until on one iron chef america he steps out of the booth and into the kitchen... god i sound like a fatass.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 06, 2005, 04:47:26 PM
The actual Iron Chef scares me.  And the food makes me want to gag.  I've never seen Iron Chef America though.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 06, 2005, 04:50:20 PM
its good, its on late so i watch it at work alot.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 06, 2005, 04:58:44 PM
I have an idea...for a new thread.  Yay.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 06, 2005, 04:59:57 PM
really? cool
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 06, 2005, 05:01:19 PM
Extremely.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 06, 2005, 05:12:48 PM
Alton Brown is SO awesome!

And yet a quite annoying actor at the same time.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 06, 2005, 07:48:30 PM
Well I think he's nifty.  So neh  :P
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 06, 2005, 07:51:42 PM
If you like bald men with hairplugs, I guess.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 06, 2005, 08:12:26 PM
Hairplug is a funny word.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 06, 2005, 09:42:13 PM
DONT DISGRACE ALTON LIKE THAT YOU SON OF A BITCH!!!
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 06, 2005, 10:40:31 PM
That made me laugh.  HARD.  I almost lost my applesauce... :lol:

Speaking of applesauce, and the rest of my current diet, I have had a revelation.

Soup should not be considered food.  For the last two days, and a few more to come, I'm sure, soup has been one of the main sources of food for me.  Because of my stupid plague, I've been forbidden to eat solid food.  Therefore I've been eating soup, applesauce, oatmeal, and ice cream.  Disgusting, I must say.

Now, this brings me to my point.  These things shouldn't be considered real food.  For the most part, you can't even use a fork to eat these things.

Oh, and I forgot Jello.  The breakfast of champions (for people who can't swallow).

The day I'm able to eat solid food will go down in recorded history.  I'm going to take pictures and write a book about it.

I think all of this mushy food is having a psychological effect on me.  I'm going nucking futs!
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 07, 2005, 11:26:18 AM
jello popsicles rock... and im a big raspberry and pineapple sherbet fan.  have you tried gargling with salt water and icing your neck?  and if you want something kind of solid theres always oysters... or white castle... lord knows both will slide right down the gullett.  or if you have a pet bird let it feed you like a baby bird.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 07, 2005, 05:30:15 PM
I'm gargling with Listerine, I just don't think I could handle the salt water.  I haven't tried the icing the neck thing.  I've also never had a Jello popsicle.

We also don't have White Castle in Florida, and the frozen ones don't do them justice.  Ahh...gutbombs.  I miss Indiana.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 07, 2005, 05:32:55 PM
We do have Crystal burgers, though.

But they're pretty disgusting.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 07, 2005, 08:06:32 PM
Who the fuck ever heard of a Crystal burger?  And am I just hallucinating or is Krystal burger?

Also, I've heard rumors of frozen Skyline chili.  Can anyone validate this?   :P
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 07, 2005, 08:59:57 PM
Who the fuck ever heard of a Crystal burger? And am I just hallucinating or is Krystal burger?

Meh.

Quote
Also, I've heard rumors of frozen Skyline chili. Can anyone validate this? :P

I've seen it before. Don't recall where though.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 07, 2005, 09:19:01 PM
Seriously...Florida sucks.  I miss Indiana... :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 07, 2005, 09:22:49 PM
You're free to go, soon that is.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 07, 2005, 11:05:29 PM
Yeah, I know.  I've always wanted to move to New York...but that's damn expensive.  So when I leave, I might just end up back in Indy.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 08, 2005, 12:27:57 PM
skyline is frozen and canned... plus you can get the dry mix but I assume its more prevalent in the ohio area
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 08, 2005, 12:28:25 PM
and if you can handle listerine then salt water is nothing
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 08, 2005, 12:47:50 PM
I just use a bit of watered down vodka as mouthwash. Shows them bacteria.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 08, 2005, 08:19:40 PM
I think I'll just stick with my Listerine.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 08, 2005, 08:21:54 PM
Well, listerine comes in whisky bottles anyways.

 Might as well use whatever I have around the house.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 08, 2005, 10:18:16 PM
Well...we don't keep liquor in the house.  So it's either Listerine, or NyQuil.   :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: GRAYWOLF on March 08, 2005, 10:47:03 PM
I think I'll just stick with my Listerine.

Salt water is safer (health wise), more effective and cheaper...not to mention taste and smell, but that is subjective.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 09, 2005, 12:25:56 AM
hot tea with a hit of hennesey conjak is great...
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 10, 2005, 06:15:08 AM
Tea tastes like ick too.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 10, 2005, 10:37:26 AM
thats why theres honey cough... its so tasty... plus a shot of booze helps.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 10, 2005, 06:36:55 PM
Me and the Chloraseptic spray...we're well acquainted.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 10, 2005, 06:39:15 PM
ooh the pocket bottles rock... as long as u keep a big bottle to refill it bc if it hurts real bad it goes quick... and do they make the green chloroseptic in a liquid??? ive only seen the lozenges.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 10, 2005, 08:02:43 PM
I didn't know they had pocket bottles.  And I do believe they make the green kind in liquid form.  I just went through a whole box of the honey-lemon lozenges though.  And I have the spray around here somewhere, but I believe it's cherry flavored.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 10, 2005, 08:11:52 PM
yeah i had a sore throat that was really bad and i still swear was a mild case of TB because it hurt and bled so damn bad but i found a small pocket pump that came free with the big bottle... it got me through work quite well.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Anthem on March 10, 2005, 08:23:28 PM
A small pocket pump, eh?

...


I didn't know they made them that small.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 10, 2005, 08:26:01 PM
yeah and they're ineffective at best
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 10, 2005, 09:47:57 PM
You need some zinc losenges, dear.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 10, 2005, 09:54:50 PM
nah... zinc doesnt work very good after ur sick... but its great to keep the immune warmed up before u ever get sick.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 10, 2005, 09:58:53 PM
Never too early to start.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 10, 2005, 10:00:19 PM
just like porn
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: bonerjoe on March 11, 2005, 01:43:52 AM
Paedophiles love your answer.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 11, 2005, 09:53:50 PM
Yeah...so back to us being ugly... :P
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 13, 2005, 12:00:43 PM
hey... its the special olympics of beauty contests.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 13, 2005, 07:54:50 PM
 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 15, 2005, 12:20:56 PM
no comment... the shrine of female listeners topic stinks of evil now...
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 15, 2005, 03:04:40 PM
Only because I'm a cunt and almost always wrong about everything.   :P
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 15, 2005, 03:28:43 PM
hey now... let shit go just drop it like an adolescent testicle... almost???
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 15, 2005, 03:40:00 PM
Christ on a cracker.  Can't any of you people take a joke?  Look at the fucking smiley face!  ^  Look at the motherfucker!   :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 15, 2005, 04:05:08 PM
jesus now you're making fun of smiley faces and calling them motherfuckers??? LIGHTEN THE FUCK UP!!!!!
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 15, 2005, 04:45:00 PM
Bite me!   :D
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 15, 2005, 10:43:01 PM
I'll pass for now... not for any other reason than i dont want to come to florida.  :-)
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 16, 2005, 06:11:36 AM
I kinda just thought about the actual topic for a change.  Are all Publisher's Clearing House winners ugly?
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: GRAYWOLF on March 16, 2005, 09:51:31 AM
I kinda just thought about the actual topic for a change.  Are all Publisher's Clearing House winners ugly?

Any chance of the "global moderator" fixing the spelling error in the subject?
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 16, 2005, 05:26:36 PM
Yeah, it's been bothering me for the longest time, but I always forget to change it.  Thanks for the reminder.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 16, 2005, 09:41:24 PM
dont change it... it and the fact that the topic was started by awakenfree is just a billboard for his brightness.  and i believe he speaks to the unprepared looks that many PCH winners have when the prize patrol knocks on their door... plus they look normal and are middle aged... there wont be alot of 10's and there wont be very many lookers either... its what normal people look like... thats why you must follow the advice of Rollye James when i paraphrase... "Be sure that the character of the person you marry is the charachter you want to be divorced from."
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worst than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: GRAYWOLF on March 17, 2005, 09:03:24 AM
Yeah, it's been bothering me for the longest time, but I always forget to change it.  Thanks for the reminder.

Thank you, oh, GM!!! :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 17, 2005, 03:36:02 PM
I'm not going to go back and change the error in all the replies though, sorry.   :P 

I just don't have the time.

I think I might want to be called Moderatrix from now on.  It's a good name.   :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 17, 2005, 03:51:54 PM
stick to lindsey or theres just going to be a hella big post on your love of whips and chains... and those red balls for in ppls mouths... and assless chaps... OH MY!
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: GRAYWOLF on March 17, 2005, 03:58:12 PM
I'm not going to go back and change the error in all the replies though, sorry.   :P 

I just don't have the time.

It was mainly the Emails that were irritating me...

Quote
I think I might want to be called Moderatrix from now on.

OH MY!!!!!! :shock: :shock: :shock:


Title: Re: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 17, 2005, 04:00:41 PM
i still maintain my arguement that the title was a monument to awakenfree's spelling.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 17, 2005, 06:54:58 PM
Go back and print out all of his posts, and then read them before you go to sleep each night.  That ought to make you feel better about yourself.  And add to your personal shrine of him.   :P
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 17, 2005, 11:54:21 PM
i shall... him and anyone who gives themselves a military title and an adjective... a.k.a. Capt. Fantastic
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on March 18, 2005, 06:19:03 AM
Not to change the subject from Awakenfree thinking shriners are ugly or anything...but...

Hey look, I got bitchslapped between yesterday afternoon and now!   :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: EclecticBuddha on March 18, 2005, 07:38:12 PM
all better... mines been slowly been going down too.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: libertylover on August 08, 2005, 09:14:00 AM
Sorry, not going to take my FTL sign down to my local Glamor Shots to take a photo for the shrine of female listeners.  It really doesn't matter to me what some adolesent,  pimply, masterbating, monkey thinks of the women pictured.  Sorry the pictures aren't up to your wanking criterion but that isn't the point is it. 
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Puke on August 08, 2005, 05:53:23 PM
Cheers!  :lol:
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: BKO on August 08, 2005, 11:41:12 PM
I swear to MOTHERFUCKING CHRIST, if one more goddamned shitsucker posts in an old, forgotten thread, I am going to drive a GODDAMNED DRYWALL SCREW THROUGH MY OWN FUCKING HEAD WITH A SCREWGUN!

SHIT!
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Puke on August 09, 2005, 06:36:30 PM
Take pictures!  :D
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Yamguy on August 10, 2005, 04:23:28 AM
Take pictures!  :D

Werd.
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: Lindsey on August 10, 2005, 04:33:56 PM
I'm just waiting for him to go off the deep end... :P
Title: Re: Female Shriners look worse than Publishers Clearing house Winners
Post by: awakenfree on March 31, 2008, 02:02:42 PM
It's the truth go look at them...