If you don't use your freedom, you'll lose it.
True.
But it is not true that using your freedom always reinforces it -- it has to be done responsibly, and mindful of other peoples' reactions.
Case in point: open carry at the HCR6 vote in the State House, and the subsequent clamp-down.
Case in point: how many of the comments from people in Keene are along the lines of, "I would generally agree with you people, but flashing boobs at a school bus is going too far..."
Case in point: how many people in Keene are generally favorable to legalizing marijuana (spoiler alert: a LOT), versus how many think a crackdown is justified on people who disrupted Keene Pumpkin Fest? (spoiler alert: even more)
Irresponsible, poorly thought-out "celebrations" like those the Keeniacs are promoting generally cause a blowback reaction that raises the number of laws and the severity of law enforcement.
Quite frankly, I don't agree with the opening premise, which I've emboldened. It's only in the environment of the abusive state (I.E., not in a realistic environment) where that can happen. FWIW, I still don't believe the assertion about how your examples of activism made a negative difference, either, and I'm guessing a LOT around here don't. You can get away with claiming they
may have made a difference, but I wouldn't take it on the word of some politician you're trying to convince to be more freedom-lovin.
I guess I'd take what you said and reword it considerably differently. Participating in behavior which you know pisses off your neighbors isn't likely going to get you what you want, but it won't be license for them to take your liberty. The rub is in the last bit. Though they can't honorably take your liberty, your actions may make you uncomfortable if you've made others uncomfortable.
BTW, I think there's VALUE in coaxing the violent bureaucrats to reveal the gun in the room. It makes obvious the basic immorality of their system.