With or without governments, people will coerce others. Its not the nature of man, or anything. Most people are good. Its just that there is a small percentage of people who suck.
So? All that means is that there will always be a need for security services and self defense.
And, sad to say, Lawyers. Or better yet, "experts in contracts, adjudication and mediation".
Its inevitable too. People will form hierarchies just naturally. A large enough group of people with a common goal, if not given any specific instruction to do so, will choose,a leader. It just happens. We're social animals, and there is no escaping that.
Again, so?
I also expect there will be churches.
That means that people will always have governance in their lives, one way or another. Its inevitable.
You're confusing "gover
nance" with "govern
ment". Govern
ance is a natural attribute of agreement, since one must govern their own actions in order to cooperate with others, and it works best to have agreed upon rules that everyone knows.
Govern
ment is the institution with the monopoly on the legitimate initiation of coercion. Without that legitimacy, a private person for example, the one who initiates coercion is assumed to be wrong.
There are natural leaders as well as natural followers. So long as coercion remains something that a leader can get "legitimately", those who crave power will gravitate to it.
Without the institution of "legitimate" coercion, those who use and advocate the use of coercion have nothing to hide behind.
"There are some troubles from which mankind can never escape. . . .
[The anarchists] have never claimed that liberty will bring perfection;
they simply say that its results are vastly preferable to those that
follow from authority....
As a choice of blessings, liberty is the greater; as a choice of evils,
liberty is the smaller. Then liberty always says the Anarchist. No use
of force except against the invader."
--- Benjamin Tucker
Edit: I can also suggest this by Tom Woods,
http://www.lewrockwell.com/woods/woods161.html