I post it because I am pro-freedom. You are not.
I have challenged your pessimism, and you insult me.
I have asked you to be precise, and you insult me.
You want to enable some jerk to goosestep into our lives and tell us what to do
If you would, please, point to where I have stated such a desire?
You're just like a Bolshevik in thinking that if you want something badly enough, human nature will conform to let your vision happen.
In direct contradiction to your insulting projection, what I assert is that competition works. Existing human nature has the pervasive aspects of "disutility of labor", that people do not
want to work, and self-interest. Laziness
and greed, in the common vernacular.
Only a free market environment prospers
because of these aspects of human nature. The greedy must satisfy other's wants in order to make a profit, and the better they satisfy those wants, cheaply, efficiently,
easily, the greater their profits.
Within
any institution with the power of "legitimate" coercion, such basic human drives become incentives to the very abuses of government that humans have been dealing with for millennia. No matter how limited such an institution may be when instituted, such as the US Constitution, it
will grow into leviathan because it always has.
My rejection of the necessity of any institution with the monopoly on coercion is a recognition of the basic motivations of human beings, and the environment where those motivations become beneficial rather than destructive.
Thus, competition in everything including private insurance. That's all the "protection agencies" are, insurance companies that do not have government courts and police to do the dirty work.
People will not change in basic ways to give you your political goal, and the history of communism should have shown you that.
Indeed history did. Which is why I find your projections insulting, and your clinging to minarchy to be justifiable by your having the very motivations you are projecting falsely to me.
Seriously, why do you think minarchy is going to work
this time? Do you think it
hasn't been tried? Maybe if it is implemented by the
right people this time? (the same assertion made, in case you don't recognize it, about socialism by socialists)
Minarchy, and the culture to preserve it.
The culture able to preserve it doesn't need it.