Digg! >> Of Primary States, Ron Paul Does Best in NH at 8%

[jimmed]

What about all those who have had time to move since Oct 2006?

Hopefully they are still coming by this year.

If the First 1000 fails, what then?

[MobileDigit]

If the First 1000 fails, what then?

Even if no one shows up for the First 1000 I still want a free society and I think concentrating liberty activists is crucial to making that a reality. I have not heard of a better chance than the FSP to achieve that.

If it completely stalls and all chance of liberty seems grim then I would retire to the freest place and live free there, provided that is profitable.

I am optimistic toward the future of liberty. I do believe change can be enacted. The American Revolution is a great example of the ability of people to live free. There is no reason why we cannot repeat this.

[jimmed]

The American Revolution is a great example of the ability of people to live free. There is no reason why we cannot repeat this.

The British didn't have nukes.

[MobileDigit]

The American Revolution is a great example of the ability of people to live free. There is no reason why we cannot repeat this.

The British didn't have nukes.

So we are relegated to our current political systems and governments simply because nuclear weapons have become accessible?

[jimmed]

The American Revolution is a great example of the ability of people to live free. There is no reason why we cannot repeat this.

The British didn't have nukes.

So we are relegated to our current political systems and governments simply because nuclear weapons have become accessible?

You can't fight an opressor that has one without one.

[AntonLee]

all those government facilities aiming their nukes at various enemy targets. . . . Singapore, Moscow, Seabrook Beach, Manchester, North Conway, and the most dreaded. . . Keene!!!!!

dumdumdum

what ever will the Free Staters do?  Perhaps they can go back in time, and stop the FSP from being brought together.  It'd be like terminator but completely pointless  em even more completely pointless.

I think this plan might already be in place. . . unfortunately what they sent to do so isn't taken seriously.

[MobileDigit]

The American Revolution is a great example of the ability of people to live free. There is no reason why we cannot repeat this.

The British didn't have nukes.

So we are relegated to our current political systems and governments simply because nuclear weapons have become accessible?

You can't fight an oppressor that has one without one.

Why not?

[DogOn]

The American Revolution is a great example of the ability of people to live free. There is no reason why we cannot repeat this.

The British didn't have nukes.

So we are relegated to our current political systems and governments simply because nuclear weapons have become accessible?

You can't fight an oppressor that has one without one.

Why not?

I'm glad to see some intelligent debate around here MD, but I would give up trying to get any sense out of that guy. It is clear that his primary motivation for discussion is not clear objective reasoning and debate.

[jimmed]

The American Revolution is a great example of the ability of people to live free. There is no reason why we cannot repeat this.

The British didn't have nukes.

So we are relegated to our current political systems and governments simply because nuclear weapons have become accessible?

You can't fight an oppressor that has one without one.

Why not?

Use logic.

[markuzick]

http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Of_Primary_States_Ron_Paul_Does_Best_in_NH_at_8_2

I believe that Paul did just a little worse in NY,(6.4%) a state 10-11 times larger that received far less of Paul's campaign resources.

Any ideas as to what this might mean?

[jimmed]

Any ideas as to what this might mean?

It means that there are 5% of Republican voters who want to keep the Mexicans out.

[markuzick]

dumdumdum

That or "duh!" should be her avatar's personal text. It fits both her avatar and the intellectual level of her posts perfectly.

[MobileDigit]

I'm glad to see some intelligent debate around here MD, but I would give up trying to get any sense out of that guy. It is clear that his primary motivation for discussion is not clear objective reasoning and debate.

I disagree. I don't think he has dodged any question I've asked so far.

I find his reasoning very intellectually stimulating.

You can't fight an oppressor that has one without one.

Why not?

Use logic.

Alright, here is the logic for why one can:
1. There exists no magical boundary between nuclear weapons and conventional weapons. Both are weapons with varying degrees of damage causing ability.
2. A man without a gun still possesses the ability to kill a man with a gun, by outsmarting his opponent.
3. Thus the oppressed can still fight and win against the oppressors, even if the oppressors possess nuclear weapons.

[trollfreezone]

Simpler yet, I refer you to Vietnam, Korea, and the endless conflicts the US has run from since acquiring the supposedly irresistible nuclear force.

[Alex Libman]

With 99% of precincts reporting, it looks like Ron Paul got 15.94% of the vote in the PA primary tonight, with "drop-out Huck" a close third...