It's not drama or analogy. Those things happen, and they will happen if you're caught and don't
stuck suck the member of the pigopoly. Those "few incidents" are the ones where people didn't suck the member or didn't do it fast enough. You're denying the gun in the room. You're claiming armed raids don't exist? Are you also a holocaust denier?
One, I don't support government, and if I did, what it calls intellectual property today would not be property rights, nor would it be acceptable to use paramilitary raids on people who one has no reason to believe are violent. The state doesn't care about things like that. They think it's really COOL.
It's not stealing, because the people still have everything they had before, but you know that because it's been addressed. Yet you're falling back on bullshit that's already been discussed, and disagreed, not the inherent violence, which I showed you and you still deny. It isn't property, and agree or disagree on that, the extreme violence is unacceptable.
I repeat: those aren't rubber guns, and there's no reason to believe the people they're pointed at are violent. You say you wouldn't defend it, but you said:
At gunpoint? Don't say goofy things if you want to be taken seriously.
...and when I showed you such violence, your response was a joke with an epithet...
Clearly, you don't take the violence of the remedy you support very seriously at all, or you'd be pissed about it, and/or looking for better solutions.