Christian Anarchy is the only sensible answer...

[rabidfurby]

These terms show that most of them do not put 100% of their own trust in their work.

No one but you and other whackjobs put 100% trust into anything. The rest of us have open minds.

[ChristianAnarchist]

These terms show that most of them do not put 100% of their own trust in their work.

No one but you and other whackjobs put 100% trust into anything. The rest of us have open minds.

There you go showing your ignorance by expressing your view of what other people believe.  I've never said that I'm 100% sure of everything I believe... are you??

[HOO-HAA]

I did not check the link above as I have literally maybe 10 minutes a day to check these posts so don't expect me to spend that kind of time doing "research" on what you provide.  I am mainly answering (or trying to with limited time) to explain WHY I believe what I do.

But, to believe what you do, you have to have rejected the ideas which you seem unwilling to even consider... no?

I know why I don't believe in xianity/ the metaphysical. I've considered the evidence and consistently find it lacking. If you have anything else to offer, I will GLADLY look at it - in a heartbeat.

I just can't get why you wouldn't be willing to do the same... especially when your standpoint comes from a mistrust of *people* who you feel have a particular agenda that is distatsteful to you/ xianity...

When Promtheous offered you a xian-friendly scientist to consider, I thought you would be jumping at the chance to see what the guy had to say...

[Russell Griswold]

I tried to have a constructive dialog, but you apparently don't want one. I am finally going to listen to advice given earlier and not post in this thread.

This thread is 159 pages of people slowly realizing that you can't argue with an irrational person.

My "Chaos is the Only Answer" thread died too quickly. This can only mean one thing, Christian Anarchy IS the Only Answer. I give up. You won, Gene! 

[ChristianAnarchist]

I did not check the link above as I have literally maybe 10 minutes a day to check these posts so don't expect me to spend that kind of time doing "research" on what you provide.  I am mainly answering (or trying to with limited time) to explain WHY I believe what I do.

But, to believe what you do, you have to have rejected the ideas which you seem unwilling to even consider... no?

I know why I don't believe in xianity/ the metaphysical. I've considered the evidence and consistently find it lacking. If you have anything else to offer, I will GLADLY look at it - in a heartbeat.

I just can't get why you wouldn't be willing to do the same... especially when your standpoint comes from a mistrust of *people* who you feel have a particular agenda that is distatsteful to you/ xianity...

When Promtheous offered you a xian-friendly scientist to consider, I thought you would be jumping at the chance to see what the guy had to say...

If I had the time I would like to watch the video but it is one hour long so I don't know when I would get around to it.  Between work and my car (installing a new engine) I have no time.

As to why I believe, I have lots of personal experiences that show me there's something other than the physical.  So most of my belief is due to things I cannot show but only testify to.  I have seen the power of evil and of God.  I also use my own common sense to determine that what we see around us could not have happened by chance as the odds are just too great...

[BKO]

The "unexplained" is called the unexplainable because it simply cannot be explained, or else it could be, and then nothing would be left to explain, leaving you either enlightened or misguided. Either way, placing a name to that which we do not know comforts our fears and discontent, as it is natural and innate to fear that which you do not know. Some would dare to say that ignorance is bliss, and I say that those who know nothing are closer to the truth than he whose mind is already filled with falsehoods and errors.

But, once again I digress.

[ChristianAnarchist]

Yes, you do...

[BKO]

I already said that.

[John Shaw]

I am so tired of this tumor of a thread I can't even put it into words that would do it justice.

Everyone quit picking on Gene.

Gene, get yourself a damned blog already.

[BKO]

I am just so happy that it actually stayed on topic (mostly) this long. I actually don't like the topic, however....perhaps I am not so much "happy" as I am just, uh, not sad.

[NHArticleTen]

I am so tired of this tumor of a thread I can't even put it into words that would do it justice.

Everyone quit picking on Gene.

Gene, get yourself a damned blog already.

well...you know it would not have had 30,600 views if it would have just said "anarchy"...

but I'll bet FTL got alot of "extra" hits...say thirty thousand or so...lol

IMHO..."many" so-called "christians" support the mobocracy and it's aggression/force/fraud...and it's pure hell converting them to voluntaryism...

[John Shaw]

It still makes me want to barf.

[NHArticleTen]

It still makes me want to barf.

second the barfing

[BKO]

fags.

[ChristianAnarchist]

I am so tired of this tumor of a thread I can't even put it into words that would do it justice.

Everyone quit picking on Gene.

Gene, get yourself a damned blog already.

well...you know it would not have had 30,600 views if it would have just said "anarchy"...

but I'll bet FTL got alot of "extra" hits...say thirty thousand or so...lol

IMHO..."many" so-called "christians" support the mobocracy and it's aggression/force/fraud...and it's pure hell converting them to voluntaryism...

I agree.  "Christians" are hard to convert to freedom, but I'm working on it...